Delaying Surgery in Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An NCDB Analysis of Oncologic Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Concern for overtreatment in very low-, low-, and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer has promoted a more conservative approach through active surveillance (AS) with comparable survival outcomes. We analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine if delaying radical prostatectomy greater than 6 months is associated with an increase in the rate of adverse pathology or secondary treatment (adjuvant or salvage) at radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Utilizing the NCDB from 2004 to 2019, 40 to 75-year-old men with very low-, low-, and favorable-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, were identified for this study. These individuals received radical prostatectomy either before or after 6 months following diagnosis. Clinical, demographic, and pathologic characteristics were obtained. Adverse pathologic outcomes were defined as pT3-4N0-1 and/or positive surgical margins. Multiple logistic regression models were used to predict delays in treatment, adverse pathologic outcomes, and receipt of secondary therapy. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox Proportional Hazards Model and the Kaplan-Meier Method. RESULTS: Of the 195,397 patients who met inclusion criteria, only 13,393 patients received surgery 6 months after diagnosis. The median time of delay was 7.5 months compared to 2.3 months in the immediate treatment group. Overall, delaying surgery had no statistically significant impact on adverse pathologic outcomes, regardless of risk category. However, when accounting for the interaction between race and delayed treatment, non-Hispanic black patients who received a delay in treatment were more likely to experience adverse features (OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.00-1.26, P = .041). Conversely, patients who had delayed surgery were less likely to receive additional therapy (either adjuvant or salvage) (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.52-0.68, P < .001). Survival analysis showed that both groups fared well, with a 5-year survival of 97% for both groups. The treatment group was not predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: Overall, delaying surgery more than 6 months following diagnosis did not have a significant impact on adverse pathologic features or overall survival. However, when specifically looking at non-Hispanic black patients with a treatment delay, these patients were at increased risk for adverse features, suggesting that the negative impact of treatment delay depends on the patient's race. As race is a social construct, this finding likely points to the complex socioeconomic factors that contribute to overall health outcomes rather than any inherent disease characteristics. Lastly, delayed treatment patients were actually less likely to require secondary therapy, regardless of race, possibly reflecting high clinician acumen in selecting patients appropriate for treatment delay. The results suggest that patients who ultimately "fail" AS and require subsequent surgery have overall comparable survival outcomes. However, pathologic outcomes are dependent on the patient's underlying race, with non-Hispanic black patients experiencing an increased risk of adverse outcomes if treatment is delayed.

Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Count is a Significant Biomarker Surrogate for Nutritional Status to Predict Overall Survival in Patients Post-radical Cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional status is an independent predictor of overall survival after radical cystectomy. Various biomarkers of nutritional status are proposed to predict postoperative outcome, including albumin, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and sarcopenia. Recently, a score comprising hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet counts was postulated as an encompassing biomarker to predict overall survival post-radical cystectomy in a single-institution study. However, cutoffs for hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count are not well defined. In this study, we analyzed hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count thresholds predicting overall survival and examined the platelet-to-lymphocyte as an additional prognostic biomarker. METHODS: Fifty radical cystectomy patients were retrospectively evaluated from 2010-2021. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, pathological data, and survival were extracted from our institutional registry. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was fit to the data to predict overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 22 (12-54) months. Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count (continuous) was a significant predictor of overall survival on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90-0.99, P = .03), adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index, lymphadenopathy (pN >N0), muscle-invasive disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Optimal hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count cutoff was 25.0. Patients with hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count <25.0 had inferior overall survival (median, 33 months) vs with those with hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count ≥25.0 (median, not reached) (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Low hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet count <25.0 was an independent predictor of inferior overall survival.

Role of Race and Insurance Status in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have shown that both race and insurance status may affect prostate cancer (PCa) workup and treatment. Preliminary investigations have shown that these factors may be associated with treatment delays, which may indicate inequitable care and increase risk of tumor progression. This investigation aimed to assess whether race and insurance impacted the interval between multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-to-biopsy, and biopsy-to-prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution analysis of 261 patients with recorded race and insurance data was performed using an Institutional Review Board-compliant database with information spanning from 2016 to 2022. Race was self-reported during intake, and insurance status was retrieved from the electronic medical record. Insurance was sub-divided into private, Medicare, and Medicaid. Diagnostic or treatment latency was defined as time between mpMRI-to-biopsy, or biopsy-to-surgery. RESULTS: Stratified by race, there was no difference in either latency period when comparing African American (AA) and white patients. Stratified by insurance status, there was no difference in time from mpMRI-to-biopsy (P = .50), but there was a significantly longer interval from biopsy-to-prostatectomy for patients with Medicaid insurance (P = .02). Patients with Medicaid waited on average 168 days to receive surgery, in contrast to 92 days for private and 87 for Medicare. Notably, 82% of Medicaid patients were AA. CONCLUSION: Insurance status, which is inherently linked to race and social determinants of health, portended a significantly increased interval between biopsy and surgery. Physicians should be aware of the relationship between insurance status and treatment delay, as well as its potential downstream consequences.