BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of pollen food syndrome in the UK.

Pollen food syndrome (PFS) is a highly prevalent food allergy affecting pollen-sensitized children and adults. Sufferers experience allergic symptoms when consuming raw plant foods, due to the homology between the pollen allergens and unstable proteins in these foods. The triggers involved can vary depending on the pollen sensitization, which in turn is affected by geographical location. The British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) identified a need to develop a guideline for the diagnosis and management of PFS in the United Kingdom (UK). Guidelines produced by the BSACI use either the GRADE or SIGN methodology; due to a lack of high-quality evidence these recommendations were formulated using the SIGN guidelines, which is acknowledged to be less robust than the GRADE approach. The correct diagnosis of PFS ensures the avoidance of a misdiagnosis of a primary peanut or tree nut allergy or confusion with another plant food allergy to non-specific lipid transfer proteins. The characteristic foods involved, and rapid-onset oropharyngeal symptoms, mean PFS can often be diagnosed from the clinical history alone. However, reactions involving tree nuts, peanuts and soya milk or severe/atypical reactions to fruits and vegetables may require additional diagnostic tests. Management is through the exclusion of known trigger foods, which may appear to be simple, but is highly problematic if coupled with a pre-existing food allergy or for individuals following a vegetarian/vegan diet. Immunotherapy to pollens is not an effective treatment for PFS, and although oral or sublingual immunotherapy to foods seems more promising, large, controlled studies are needed. The typically mild symptoms of PFS can lead to an erroneous perception that this condition is always easily managed, but severe reactions can occur, and anxiety about the onset of symptoms to new foods can have a profound effect on quality of life.

Home-based cow's milk reintroduction using a milk ladder in children less than 3 years old with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy.

BACKGROUND: The development of tolerance to cow's milk in allergic children is best determined by supervised baked milk exposure. Widely recommended hospital-based challenges can potentially delay contact because of resource limitations. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of our low-dose home-based reintroduction programme. METHODS: In our allergy service, children with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy who met set criteria (presenting with skin and/or gastrointestinal symptoms only and skin prick test < 8 mm) are considered for home-based milk reintroduction (HMR). Early contact is low-dose ingestion of a commercial baked milk biscuit with slow gradual further exposure followed by increasing milk contact using a milk ladder. We retrospectively reviewed 4-6 monthly attendance records assessing allergic symptoms, evolving milk tolerance, and compliance. Tolerance was determined using a 7 scale scoring system based on the milk ladder. RESULTS: The clinic attendance and dietetic contact records of 86 children (49 girls) who underwent HMR were reviewed. HMR was started at a median of 13 months with 49% 8-12 months, 40% 13-18 months and 11% 19-33 months. Allergic symptoms were reported in 81 (43%) of 189 dietetic reviews, 65 (80%) of which were from the milk ladder; no patient experienced anaphylaxis requiring treatment with intramuscular adrenaline. After four reviews, only eight patients were not tolerating almost all dairy products, and there was a high rate of completion with only a further seven patients lost to the programme. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cow's milk can be successfully and safely reintroduced in a cautious low-dose exclusively home-based programme in the appropriate clinical and family setting.

Evaluation of AllergiSense Smartphone Tools for Adrenaline Injection Training.

Anaphylaxis is an increasingly prevalent life-threatening allergic condition that requires people with anaphylaxis and their caregivers to be trained in the avoidance of allergen triggers and in the administration of adrenaline autoinjectors. The prompt and correct administration of autoinjectors in the event of an anaphylactic reaction is a significant challenge in the management of anaphylaxis. Unfortunately, many people do not know how to use autoinjectors and either fail to use them or fail to use them correctly. This is due in part to deficiencies in training and also to the lack of a system encouraging continuous practice with feedback. Assistive smartphone healthcare technologies have demonstrated potential to support the management of chronic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but there have been deficiencies in their evaluation and there has been a lack of application to anaphylaxis. This paper describes AllergiSense, a smartphone app and sensing system for anaphylaxis management, and presents the results of a randomized, controlled, prepost evaluation of AllergiSense injection training and feedback tools with healthy participants. Participants whose training was supplemented with AllergiSense injection feedback achieved significantly better practiced injections with 90.5% performing correct injections compared to only 28.6% in the paper-only control group. In addition, the results provide insights into possible self-efficacy failings in traditional training and the benefits of embedding self-efficacy theory into the technology design process.

Practice of the Treatment of Milk Allergy in the UK: A National Audit.

BACKGROUND: The management of cow's milk allergy (CMA) includes initial dairy exclusion with suitable dietary substitution, diagnostic challenges where indicated, and supervised re-introduction as the condition resolves. Information on clinician practice is limited. We audited the current practice of clinicians in the UK to evaluate adherence to international guidelines. METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to all clinicians whose practice included children identified on the national allergy society website. One hundred and sixty questionnaires were sent and 116 (73%) responded. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were more commonly used than serum-specific IgE as diagnostic tests. Respective proportions selecting amino acid formulas (AAF) or extensively hydrolysed formulas (EHF) in severe versus mild/moderate presentations were 78 and 40% versus 20 and 88%; soya formula was the first choice in 8.6 and 24%. The criteria for selection of AAF as the first choice were predominantly severe IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated reactions, failure to thrive and if infants refused EHF. Oral challenges might be used to diagnose CMA in 69%, whereas nearly 90% performed challenges to assess tolerance. Most of these were open challenges, more commonly with fresh milk (90%) than baked milk (60%). Home baked milk challenges were frequently considered (70%), although only after consideration of the clinical scenario. Practice did not vary with experience. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice amongst UK clinicians of the management of CMA is broadly in line with current guidance, particularly the positioning of hypoallergenic milks as substitute milk choices. A notable deviation was the use of home baked milk challenges or re-introduction.

Implementing specific oral tolerance induction to milk into routine clinical practice: experience from first 50 patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the natural history of cow's milk allergy is to resolve during childhood or adolescence, a small but significant proportion of children will remain allergic. Specific oral tolerance induction to cow's milk (CM-SOTI) provides a treatment option in these children with continuing allergy with high success rates. However current sentiment limits widespread availability as existing reports advise that it is too soon to translate CM-SOTI into routine clinical practice. METHODS: In January 2007 we implemented a slow up-dosing CM-SOTI program. Eligible subjects were identified at routine visits to our children's allergy clinic. Persisting cow's milk allergy was confirmed from recent contact symptoms or a positive baked milk challenge. As allergic symptoms are common during CM-SOTI, families were provided with ready dietetic access for advice on dosing and symptom treatment. Subjects were continuously monitored at subsequent clinic visits or telephonically, where no longer followed, for a median of 49 months. RESULTS: The first 50 subjects (35 males) treated ranged in age from 5.1 to 15.8 years (median 10.3 years). Full tolerance (250 mL) was achieved in 23 subjects, 9 without any symptoms, and a further 9 achieved partial tolerance with continued ingestion. Eighteen children failed to achieve any regular milk ingestion; 11 because of persistent or significant symptoms whilst 8 withdrew against medical advice. Allergic symptoms were predominantly mild to moderate in severity, although 2 cases needed treatment with inhaled salbutamol and a further 2 required intramuscular adrenaline. Clinical tolerance, both full and partial, persists beyond 5 years. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that a CM-SOTI program can be successfully and safely implemented as routine clinical practice with acceptable compliance during prolonged home up-dosing, despite frequent allergic symptoms, and for up to 4 years after starting treatment. CM-SOTI can thus be put into practice more widely where there is appropriate support.

Single nut or total nut avoidance in nut allergic children: outcome of nut challenges to guide exclusion diets.

BACKGROUND: Children with diagnosed nut allergy are typically advised by health professionals to exclude all nuts from their diets, irrespective of the outcome of allergy testing, to avoid inadvertent contact through contamination or the possible development of new allergies. METHODS: In our service, as we feel greater diagnostic accuracy prevents dietary risk taking, we provide the facility for children with nut allergy the opportunity of controlled exposure to 'other' nuts irrespective of whether their allergy prick test (PT) results are positive or negative. We performed open food challenges on our paediatric day ward. The challenge food was administered by way of a homemade biscuit containing 8 g of each nut challenged and given in increasing visually measured doses. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period from 2006, we challenged 145 children diagnosed as peanut allergic or tree nut allergic. In those with peanut allergy challenged to tree nuts, none of the 72 with negative PTs to tree nuts reacted on challenge whilst 7 of 22 (31.2%) with positive PTs did. In patients with tree nut allergy challenged to peanuts and/or other tree nuts, 3 of 38 (7.9%) with negative PT results and 5 of 13 (38.4%) with positive PT results reacted. CONCLUSION: Children allergic to peanuts with negative allergy tests to tree nuts had no co-existing allergy, but were at risk of tree nut allergy where PTs were positive. Children with tree nut allergy were at risk of co-existing peanut or other tree nut allergy whether PTs were positive or negative. Oral challenges to clarify allergy status in all nuts show co-existing allergies even in young children and in so doing may reduce anxiety, minimize unnecessary dietary restrictions and prevent later episodes of anaphylaxis through uninformed exposure.

Triggers, clinical features and management of anaphylaxis in children.

This article describes the clinical features of anaphylaxis in children and young people. The acute management of anaphylaxis in hospital and community is described and various prevention strategies are discussed.

A qualitative study of families of a child with a nut allergy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methods, the experiences of children and their parents living with nut allergy. METHODS: Children with a confirmed diagnosis of peanut allergy were identified from a database of patients maintained at an allergy clinic at a large teaching hospital. Interviews with 26 families were conducted involving 11 children, 25 mothers and 12 fathers. RESULTS: The diagnosis of nut allergy signalled a critical transition-or biographical disruption-in the life of the family. Parents took on the role of 'alert assistant' and sought to create 'safe places' where nuts were not permitted, but often struggled when outside the home environment. The option of 'passing as normal', often used by people with a chronic illness to avoid stigma, was not available to them. Consequently, parents often reported being treated as faddy, demanding, and neurotic, and children suffered from teasing and exclusion. The social consequences of nut allergy were worsened by poor labelling and control of foods and products containing nuts. DISCUSSION: In many ways, nut allergy may be considered a form of disability, because it imposes social barriers on participating fully in society.

Candida peritonitis: a rare complication following early dislodgement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.

UNLABELLED: Candida peritonitis is a rare but potentially fatal complication of early dislodgement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube. We report the case of 12-year-old boy who developed Candida peritonitis subsequent to early dislodgement of PEG tube. PEG tubes may be prone to accidental dislodgement or removal by patients or carers. This complication has to be recognized early in order to avoid the risk of peritonitis. In our case the patient initially developed coliform peritonitis followed by peritoneal and systemic candidiasis. The patient needed ventilatory support, inotropic support, broad-spectrum antibiotics, total parenteral nutrition and antifungal agents liposomal amphotericin and flucytosine. CONCLUSION: Early dislodged PEG tubes should be recognized early in order to avoid the risk of peritonitis and managed by endoscopic or surgical replacement rather than blind replacement by the appropriately skilled personnel.