Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Is There Any Advantage of Robotic Resections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The role of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in patients requiring surgery for gastric GISTs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 4, 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to select all types of analytic studies comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for GISTs and reporting intraoperative, postoperative, and/or pathological outcomes. Results: Overall, 4 retrospective studies were selected, including a total of 264 patients, specifically 111 (42%) in the robotic and 153 (58%) in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operating time (+42.46 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.34, 75.58; P=0.01; I2: 85%) and reduced use of mechanical staplers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.11; P<0.00001; I2: 92%;) compared with laparoscopy. Although nonsignificant, conversion to open surgery was less frequently reported for robotic surgery (2.7%) than laparoscopy (5.2%) (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.17, 2.03; P=0.4; I2: 0%). No difference was found for postoperative and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for gastric GISTs provides similar intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes to laparoscopy, despite longer operative time.

Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for nonmetastatic pT4 colon cancer: A European multicentre propensity score-matched analysis.

AIM: Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly adopted for locally advanced colon cancer. However, evidence comparing robotic (RRC) versus laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) for nonmetastatic pT4 cancers is lacking. METHODS: This was a multicentre propensity score-matched (PSM) study of a cohort of consecutive patients with pT4 right colon cancer treated with RRC or LRC. The two surgical approaches were compared in terms of R0, number of lymph nodes harvested, intra- and postoperative complication rates, overall (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Among a total of 200 patients, 39 RRC were compared with 78 PS-matched LRC patients. The R0 rate was similar between RRC and LRC (92.3% vs. 96.2%, respectively; p = 0.399), as was the odds of retrieving 12 or more lymph nodes (97.4% vs. 96.2%; p = 1). No significant difference was noted for the mean operating time (192.9 min vs. 198.3 min; p = 0.750). However, RRC was associated with fewer conversions to laparotomy (5.1% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.032), less blood loss (36.9 vs. 95.2 mL; p < 0.0001), fewer postoperative complications (17.9% vs. 41%; p = 0.013), a shorter time to flatus (2 vs. 2.8 days; p = 0.009), and a shorter hospital stay (6.4 vs. 9.5 days; p < 0.0001) compared with LRC. These results were confirmed even when converted procedures were excluded from the analysis. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS (p = 0.757) and DFS (p = 0.321) did not significantly differ between RRC and LRC. CONCLUSION: Adequate oncological outcomes are observed for RRC and LRC performed for pT4 right colon cancer. However, RRC is associated with lower conversion rates and improved short-term postoperative outcomes.

Colorectal metastases with intrabiliary growth: incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Intrabiliary growth (IG) is an unusual modality for colorectal metastases to spread. Relatively little is known about this condition because large series are lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with or without IG. From 01/2010 to 12/2020, 999 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Clinicopathological variables were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective-collected database of patients with or without IG. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis to compare OS and DFS was performed. At first hepatectomy, 29 patients (2.9%) had IG: 7 isolated IG and 22 mixed-type (mass-forming lesion with IG). 4 patients presented IG at repeat hepatectomy for recurrence, of whom 3 had no biliary invasion at initial surgery. IG resulted to be more common in older patients (median age 70 in IG vs 60 years of no-IG, p = 0.004). Mean time from colorectal tumor was longer in IG (20.4 months) than no-IG (12.9 months), p = 0.038. Major hepatectomies (55.2% IG vs 29.7% no-IG, p = 0.003) and anatomic resections (89.7% vs 58.2%, p = 0.001) were more frequently required to treat IG. In 5 (17%) of IG, a resection of main bile duct was performed. Overall postoperative mortality and complications were similar in the two groups, while bile leak was 17.2% IG vs 5.6% no-IG (p = 0.024). Median margin width was comparable in IG (1.4 mm) and no-IG (2 mm). Five-year overall survival (IG 45.9% vs no-IG 44.5%) and Disease-Free Survival (IG 35.9% vs no-IG 36.6%) were similar in the two groups. According to PSM, 145 patients with no-IG were compared to 29 of IG group. After PSM, OS and DFS did not show any statistically significant difference. IG has similar oncological outcomes of resected colorectal metastases without IG, although it affects surgical management.

Situs viscerum inversus and abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review of a rare association.

Situs viscerum inversus (SVI) is a very rare condition in that abdominal and thoracic organs are located reversed. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening pathology due to progressive aortic enlargement until the rupture. The association between SVI and AAA is very infrequent. The aim of this study is to identify the surgical procedures available to treat AAA in SVI. We performed a literature review of all studies about AAA in SVI patients, analyzing PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), Google Scholar databases. The survey includes all publications until June 2023. The outcomes include demographic findings, type of surgical procedure, intraoperative and postoperative complications, follow-up. A total of 12 studies, including 12 patients, were considered eligible for the review. AAA mean size was 70.5 mm (range: 55-90 mm); the most common localization was in the infrarenal aortic portion. 6 studies reported data on elective surgery, and 6 on emergency procedures. In one case endovascular treatment was performed. No intraoperative complications are reported; 3 postoperative complications are registered. Medium follow-up period was 13.5 months (range: 3-60). According to the available literature, the treatment of AAA in SVI is feasible and does not show an incremented morbidity compared to patients with a normal visceral configuration. This treatment seems to be effective also in case of endovascular treatment. AAA treatment in SVI should be performed (especially in elective settings) in high volume centers where it is possible to bring on collaboration across different surgical specialists.

Recurrence after Curative Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: How to Predict the Chance of Repeat Hepatectomy?

(1) Background: Tumor recurrence after liver resection (LR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is common. Repeat liver resection (RLR) for recurrent ICC results in good survival outcomes in selected patients. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting the chance of resectability of recurrent ICC. (2) Methods: LR for ICC performed between January 2001 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had undergone first LR were considered for the study. Data on recurrences were analyzed. A logistic regression model was used for multivariable analysis of factors related to RLR rate. (3) Results: In total, 140 patients underwent LR for ICC. Major/extended hepatectomies were required in 105 (75%) cases. The 90-day mortality was 5.7%, Clavien-Dindo grade 3, 4 complications were 9.3%, N+ disease was observed in 32.5%, and the median OS was 38.3 months. Recurrence occurred in 91 patients (65%). The site of relapse was the liver in 53 patients (58.2%). RLR was performed in 21 (39.6%) patients. Factors that negatively affected RLR were time to recurrence ≤12 months (OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.68-33.16, p = 0.008) and major hepatectomy (OR 16.7, 95% CI 3.8-73.78, p < 0.001) at first treatment. Survival after recurrence was better in patients who underwent RLR as compared with not resected patients (31 vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: Patients with ICC treated at first resection with major hepatectomy and those who recurred in ≤12 months had significantly lower probability to receive a second resection for recurrence.