Does an imaging stress-test adds information to prognostic scores in patients with chest pain in the emergency department?

We evaluated the ability of a stress-test (Str-T) to improve the risk stratification based on prognostic scores in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. Between 2008, June and 2013, December, 1082 patients with chest pain were evaluated with an imaging Str-T. With a retrospective analysis, patients were stratified according to: (1) Florence Prediction Rule as low (0-1, LR-FPR), intermediate (2-4, IR-FPR), high risk (5-6, HR-FPR), respectively, 26, 50 and 24% of patients; (2) HEART score as LR-HEART, (0-3) and HR-HEART (≥4), respectively, 36 and 64%; (3) likelihood of CAD according to NICE guidelines, 10-29% LR-NICE, 30-60% IR-NICE and > 60% HR-NICE, respectively, 12, 18 and 70%. Scores' diagnostic performance was calculated with Str-T as reference. One-month follow-up by a phone call was performed, to investigate the occurrence of new cardiovascular events. In LR and HR patients, FPR and NICE score showed sensitivity 66 vs 93%, specificity 59 vs 19% (both p < 0.001), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 36 vs 31%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 83 vs 87%. Among LR-HEART patients, Str-T was positive for inducible ischemia in 53 (14%) patients and 12 (4%) of them underwent a percutaneous coronary revascularization. The Str-T was negative for inducible ischemia in 760 (70%) patients, positive in 272 (25%), inconclusive in 50 (5%); among patients in the LR and IR subgroups, incidence of CAD (1.3 and 1.6%) and the cumulative incidence of significant events at 1-month follow-up (both 1%) was very low Str-T improved prognostic scores' diagnostic performance in LR- and HR-subgroups.

Long-term prognostic value of dysglycemia and ischemic vascular disease beyond abnormal troponin levels in patients presenting acute atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Prognostication beyond troponin levels in patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unclear. METHODS: One-month and 1-year outcomes in 1091 patients with acute AF were analyzed. Primary endpoints were stroke or the composite of acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and death. RESULTS: In the short term, troponin (odds ratio (OR) 15, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-67.9, P < 0.001) and known ischemic heart disease (OR 5.83, 95% CI, 1.3-26.2, P = 0.021) were predictors of the composite endpoint, with multivariate analysis. No variables linked with stroke. In the long term, metabolic syndrome (OR 4.7, 95% CI, 1.2-18.3, P = 0.024) and age (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1, P = 0.009) were predictors of stroke; metabolic syndrome (OR 4.3, 95% CI, 1.6-11.0, P = 0.003), known ischemic heart disease (OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.7-6.4, P = 0.001), persistence of AF after the first-line approach (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.2-4.3, P = 0.018), and age (OR 1.0, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1, P = 0.025), but not troponin so were of the composite endpoint. In the short term, increased discriminative values in prognostication of the composite endpoint were observed with C-statistic when troponin was compared with dysglycemia (P = 0.032). No variables did better than others in the prognostication of stroke. In the long term, increased discriminative values in the prognostication of stroke were observed with C-statistic when age was compared with troponin (P = 0.020), ischemic heart disease (P = 0.025), and persistence of AF after the first-line approach (P = 0.049); so was for CHADS2 score ≥1 versus vascular disease (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute AF, abnormal troponin levels add prognostic value to clinical parameters in the short term; dysglycemia and known vascular disease in the long term.

Abnormal troponin level as short-term predictor of poor outcome in acute atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The link between minor troponin (cardiac troponin I [cTnI]) elevations and atrial fibrillation (AF) is still debated. METHODS: A total of 948 patients with AF lasting less than 48 hours participated in the study and were required to undergo 1-month and 12-month follow-up. The exclusion criteria were represented by younger than 18 years, the presence of hemodynamic instability, or severe comorbidity. Primary end point was the composite of ischemic vascular events inclusive of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and death. RESULTS: In the short term, 4 patients (5%) of 78 with abnormal cTnI reached the primary end point (P = .001 vs others). Conversely, in the long term, 13 patients (17%) with abnormal cTnI, 21 (10%) with known ischemic vascular disease, and 50 (5%) aged patients (75 ± 10 years) reached the primary end point (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .002, respectively). At multivariate analysis, abnormal cTnI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-5.84; P = .005), known ischemic vascular disease (HR, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.70; P = .021), and age (HR, 1.05; 95 confidence interval, 1.02-1.08; P = .002) were predictors of the primary end point. Minimal or minor cTnI elevation (<0.45 or ≥ 0.45 ng/mL, respectively) showed no differences when associated with the primary end point. The C-statistic demonstrated the significant prognostic value of older age and known ischemic vascular disease, beyond troponin. Clinical parameters inclusive of heart rate, blood pressure, and risk factors for arteriosclerosis showed no relationship with adverse events. Readmission rate did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute AF, minor cTnI elevations link to short-term adverse events. Known ischemic vascular disease and older age showed prognostic value only in the long term.

Risk scores prognostic implementation in patients with chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms.

BACKGROUND: Several risk scores are available for prognostic purpose in patients presenting with chest pain. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare Grace, Pursuit, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Goldman, Sanchis, and Florence Prediction Rule (FPR) to exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), decision making, and outcome in the emergency setting. METHODS: Patients with nondiagnostic ECGs and normal troponins and without history of coronary disease underwent exercise ECG. Patients with positive testing underwent coronary angiography; otherwise, they were discharged. End point was the composite of coronary stenosis at angiography or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, and revascularization at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of 508 patients considered, 320 had no history of coronary disease: 29 were unable to perform exercise testing, and finally, 291 were enrolled. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for Grace, Pursuit, TIMI, Goldman, Sanchis, and FPR were 0.59, 0.68, 0.69, 0.543, 0.66, and 0.74, respectively (P < .05 FPR vs Goldman and Grace). In patients with negative exercise ECG and overall low risk score, only the FPR effectively succeeded in recognizing those who achieved the end point; in patients with high risk score, the additional presence of carotid stenosis and recurrent angina predicted the end point (odds ratio, 12 and 5, respectively). Overall, logistic regression analysis including exercise ECG, coronary risk factors, and risk scores showed that exercise ECG was an independent predictor of coronary events (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The FPR effectively succeeds in ruling out coronary events in patients categorized with overall low risk score. Exercise ECG, nonetheless being an independent predictor of coronary events could be considered questionable in this subset of patients.

Short- and long-term cardiac events in patients with chest pain with or without known existing coronary disease presenting normal electrocardiogram.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate incidence of adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain with or without known existing coronary disease presenting normal electrocardiogram (ECG) and initial troponin. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized study enrolled low-risk patients with normal ECG and troponin on admission who underwent observation and/or stress testing by unstandardized clinical judgment. Patients who experienced recurrent angina or positive ECGs or positive troponins during observation or patients with positive stress testing were admitted; otherwise, they were discharged. END POINT: The end points are cardiac events at short- and long-term follow-up including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and revascularization. RESULTS: Of 5656 patients considered, 1732 with ischemic ECG were initially admitted and, therefore, excluded from the analysis; 2860 with pleuritic chest pain and normal ECG were discharged; 1064 with visceral chest pain and normal ECG were enrolled. Patients with known coronary disease (45%) were older and likely presented known vascular disease. Patients with known vascular disease, older age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, and lower chest pain score were likely managed with observation. In patients with known coronary disease as compared with patients without, overall cardiac events account for 35% vs 14%, respectively (P < .001), as follows: in-hospital, 23% vs 10%, (P < .001); 1 month, 4% vs 2% (P = .133); and 9.9 ± 4.9 months, 8% vs 2%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with chest pain with known coronary disease, negative ECG, and biomarkers were subsequently found to have adverse cardiac events. The value of this research for an emergency medicine audience could be extended to all clinicians and general practitioners beyond cardiologists.