Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30124241

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the clinical features of neurocysticercosis(NCC) to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Methods: Medical records of NCC patients in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University received between January 2003 and January 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. The epidemiological data, clinical manifestations, therapeutic procedures and outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results: A total of 94 NCC patients met the recruiting criteria, of whom 67.0%(63/94) were male, 59.6%(56/94) ranged 30-55 years old, 73.4%(69/94) had a living history in endemic regions such as Aba, Ganzi and Liangshan prefectures, 80.9%(76/94) lived in rural areas. NCC was clinically characterized by epilepsy, headache and intracranial hypertension. The positive rate for anti-T. solium antibodies by ELISA was 96.8%(91/94), and the total positive scan rate of neuroimaging including CT and MRI was 95.7%(90/94). In addition, 73 patients were suspected to have NCC at the first diagnosis, with a misdiagnosis rate of 22.3%(21/94). Seventy-nine of the patients received albendazole treatmentï¼»20 mg/(kg·d), twice per day for 10 days as one treatment course, 1-3 courses as neededï¼½. Eleven patients received praziquantel(total dose of 120-180 mg/kg, 3 times per day for 3 days as one treatment course, 1-3 courses), and 4 received a combination of albendazole and praziquantel. Symptoms improved in 77 cases(81.9%), but 12 of them(12/77, 15.6%) relapsed. The improvement rate of the albendazole group(6/11, 84.8%) was significantly higher than that of the praziquantel group(54.6%)(P<0.05). Conclusion: NCC more commonly occurs in young males and lacks specific clinical manifestations. Neuroimaging combined with serum specific antibody tests is crucial for diagnosis. Albendazole has better therapeutic effects than praziquantel.


Subject(s)
Neurocysticercosis , Adult , Albendazole , Antibodies , China , Diagnostic Errors , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Praziquantel , Retrospective Studies
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 80(2): 141-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25130297

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin 750 mg for 5 days versus 500 mg for 7-14 days intravenous (IV) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This clinical trial was the first of its kind conducted in Chinese people and also in Asian population. A total of 241 were enrolled and randomized to 750 mg group (n = 121) or 500 mg (n = 120) group from 10 study centers. The median treatment duration was 5.0 days in 750 mg and 9.0 days in 500 mg group. The median total dose was 3750 mg in 750 mg and 4500 mg in 500 mg group. The bacterial eradication rate was 100% in both groups. The overall efficacy rate in 750 mg group was 86.2% (94/109), and 84.7% (94/111), in 500 mg group of full analysis set visit 4, 95% confidence interval of 1.6% (-7.8-10.9%); the statistical results showed that 750 mg group was non-inferior to 500 mg group. The most common clinical adverse drug reactions were injection site adverse reactions in both 750 mg group and 500 mg group; the other common adverse drug reactions were insomnia, nausea, skin rash, etc. The most common drug-related laboratory abnormalities were neutrophil percentage decreased, decreased white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase elevation in both 750 mg group and 500 mg group. Most of adverse drug reactions were mild in severity and well-tolerated. In summary, the regimen of levofloxacin 750 mg IV for 5 days was at least as effective and well tolerated as 500 mg IV for 7-14 days for the treatment of CAP.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Levofloxacin/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , China , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Levofloxacin/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24809196

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of visceral leishmaniasis cases in Sichuan. METHODS: The medical records of 137 patients with visceral leishmaniasis were reviewed between January 2000 and April 2012 in West China Hospital. The epidemiological data, clinical manifestations, laboratory features, diagnosis, therapeutic procedures and outcome of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (64.2%) out of 137 cases were the residents in the endemic area of Sichuan Province and adjacent areas, and 49 (35.8%) were non-endemic area residents with a history of visiting endemic area. Patients living in rural areas accounted for 84.7% (116/137), in town for 15.3% (21/137). Visceral leishmaniasis should be strongly suspected in a patient with prolonged fever, marked hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenectasis, cytopenia and hypergammaglobulinemia. All patients showed positive in rk39 dipstick test, and were treated with antimony sodium gluconate. Among these patients, 86.1% (118/137) were cured by drug, 2.9% (4/137) received splenectomy, and 6.6% (9/137) relapsed. The misdiagnosis rate was 23.4% (32/137). CONCLUSION: Bone marrow smear staining and biopsy, combined with rk39 antibody detection and epidemiological history are crucial for early diagnosis and treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Antimonials is still an effective therapeutic choice.


Subject(s)
Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
Indian J Med Res ; 134: 270-80, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21985809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis for Mycoplasma pneumoniae usually relies on serological tests. PCR technology has some advantages but also limitations. The optimal selection for these tests still needs discussion. This paper reviews the overall diagnostic accuracy of PCR versus serological assays for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infections and to identify factors associated with heterogeneity of results. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. Articles meeting the selection criteria were retrieved for data collection and analysis. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using QUADAS. Hierarchial summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model was used to estimate summary ROC curve. RESULTS: Initial meta-analysis showed a summary estimate of sensitivity (SEN) 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.76), and specificity (SPE) 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Subgroup analyses were performed to identify factors associated with heterogeneity. For different gene targets, reference standards, subjects (children or adults) and different PCR types, these aspects can generate results of heterogeneity. The 16s rDNA target and adult subjects and real-time PCR may have better test results for PCR. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Commercial PCR tests generated consistent results with high specificity but a lower and more variable sensitivity. The findings suggest commercial PCR tests having superiorities in diagnosing M. pneumoniae infections but still cannot replace serology. PCR plus serology could be good screening tests for reliable and accurate diagnosis of M. pneumoniae.


Subject(s)
Mycoplasma pneumoniae/genetics , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Serology/methods , Adult , Child , Humans , MEDLINE , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 42(3): 279-83, 2010 Jun 18.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20559401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of inappropriate antibiotic use on inpatients' cost during hospitalization. METHODS: 1 000 cases with antibiotic treatment were extracted from 10 hospitals of 5 provinces in China in 2005. We created multivariate linear regression model for hospital cost and Logistic regression model for evaluation of rationality in antibiotic use. RESULTS: We collected 946 valid cases. Rate of inappropriate antibiotic use was 58.4%. Costs of inpatients with inappropriate antibiotic use was 1.55 times of the ones with appropriate use (P<0.001). Risk factors included antibiotic prophylaxis (OR=2.929), medication for surgery (OR=2.44), long hospital stay (OR=1.021 for every prolonged day) and regional factors. Protection factor was in tertiary hospital (OR=0.510). CONCLUSION: Inappropriate antibiotic use could add 55% unnecessary cost on inpatients. Efforts to control misuse of antibiotics such as regulating antibiotic prophylaxis and medication for surgery, and decreasing length of stay should be pursued.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/economics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/economics , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Inappropriate Prescribing/economics , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , China , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Inpatients , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...