Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration.

The modern era of common bile duct (CBD) surgery started with Mirizzi, who introduced intraoperative cholangiography in 1932. Intraoperative choledoscopy had been developed as an adjunctive to intraoperative cholangiography, which helped to detect CBD stones in an additional 10% to 15% of instances that otherwise would have been missed. Findings have shown choledochoscopy to be an important technique for efficient and effective management of CBD stones. Efforts to treat patients with common duct stones in one session and to avoid the potential complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy resulted in several laparoscopic transcystic CBD (LTCBDE) techniques. The techniques of transcystic stone extraction include lavage, trolling with wire baskets or biliary balloon catheters, cystic duct dilation, biliary endoscopy, and stone retrieval with wire baskets under direct vision and antegrade sphincterotomy, lithotripsy, and catheter techniques. The indications for LTCBDE are filling or equivocal defects at cholangiography, stones smaller than 10 mm, fewer than 9 stones, and possible tumor. The contraindications are stones larger than 1 cm, stones proximal to the cystic duct entrance into the CBD, small friable cystic duct, and 10 or more stones. Experience with LTCBDE shows that the approach is applicable in more than 85% of cases, with a success rate of 85% to 95%. It also is shown to be more cost effective than postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Recent developments in LTCBDE have focused mainly on implementation of robotically assisted surgery and new imaging methods such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy and three-dimensional ultrasound. Further technological advances will facilitate the application of laparoscopic approaches to the common duct, which should become the primary strategy for the great majority of patients.

Leveling the learning curve for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve for laparoscopic bariatric surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The study included the first 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGB) by a designated surgical team. Surgeon A operated as primary surgeon, with surgeon B assisting (Stage 1). Surgeon B learned LGB in stages: exposure and jejunojejunostomy (stage 2), gastric pouch (stage 3), gastrojejunostomy (stage 4), and sequence all steps (stage 5). RESULTS: Surgeon A achieved confidence with LGB after 20 cases and surgeon B after 25 cases (stage 2), 18 cases (stage 3), 21 cases (stage 4), and 16 cases (stage 5). Complications (8%) included small bowel obstruction (three); pulmonary embolus (two), and leak, stomal stenosis, and gastrogastric fistula (one each). There was a decreasing trend for operative duration, length of stay, and complications across the five stages (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By transferring skills in stages, a laparoscopic bariatric program can be established with minimal morbidity and mortality.

Current status of an antireflux procedure in laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

BACKGROUND: Persistent dysphagia and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are the most cited reasons for surgical failure of laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Adding an antireflux procedure to Heller myotomy has been proposed to prevent reflux. We hypothesized that an antireflux procedure added to laparoscopic Heller myotomy has little effect on preventing the symptoms or long-term sequelae of GER in achalasia patients. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies on human subjects reported in the English language literature from 1991 to 2001 years. RESULTS: An antireflux procedure accompanied laparoscopic myotomy in 15 studies with 532 patients. In 6 studies of 69 patients, no antireflux procedure was added to laparoscopic myotomy. Follow-up was available on 489 patients (92%) with partial fundoplication. The rate of GER diagnosed in pH studies was 7.9% (18 of 228 patients studied), whereas only 5.9% of patients experienced symptoms of GER (29 of 489 patients followed). Of the 69 patients without fundoplication, 47 (68%) were available for follow-up. Forty patients (85%) were studied with pH monitoring postoperatively, with 4 (10%) demonstrating reflux. Six (13%) of 47 patients had symptoms of GER. The difference in the rate of GER diagnosed in postmyotomy pH studies in wrapped and nonwrapped patients was not significant (7.9 vs 10%, respectively; p = 0.75). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of postmyotomy GER symptoms in wrapped and nonwrapped patients (5.9 vs 13% respectively; p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Reflux is not necessarily eliminated with the addition of a partial fundoplication. Based on the published data, recommendations cannot be made regarding the efficacy of adding an antireflux procedure to laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Prospective randomized study is needed to clarify the role of an antireflux procedure after laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Follow-up imaging studies of blunt splenic injury: do they influence management?

BACKGROUND: The exact value of follow-up ultrasonography and computed tomography in the non-operative management of blunt splenic injuries is not yet defined. Although follow-up studies have been recommended to detect possible complications of the initial injury, evidence shows that routine follow-up CT scans usually do not affect management of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether follow-up imaging influences the management of patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 155 trauma patients were admitted with splenic trauma to a major trauma center. Excluded from the study were trauma patients with penetrating injuries, children, and those who underwent immediate laparotomy due to hemodynamic instability or associated injuries. The remaining trauma patients were managed conservatively. Splenic injury was suspected by focused abdominal sonography for trauma, upon admission, and confirmed by CT scan. The severity of splenic injury was graded from I to V. The clinical outcome was obtained from medical records. RESULTS: We identified 32 adult patients (27 males and 5 females) with blunt splenic injuries who were managed non-operatively. In two patients it was not successful, and splenectomy was performed because of hemodynamic deterioration. The remaining 30 stable patients were divided into two groups: those who had only the initial ultrasound and CT scan with no follow-up studies (n = 8), and those who underwent repeat follow-up ultrasound or CT scan studies (n = 22). The severity of injury was similar in both groups in the second group follow-up studies showed normal spleens in 2 patients, improvement in 11, no change in 8, and deterioration in one. All patients in both groups were managed successfully with good clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: In the present series the follow-up radiological studies did not affect patient management. Follow-up imaging can be omitted in clinically stable patients with blunt splenic trauma grade I-III.

Combined colon and hepatic resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The surgical strategy for the treatment of resectable synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study was performed to assess the outcome of combined resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. METHODS: The perioperative data, morbidity, and survival of the patients who underwent combined colon and liver resections for synchronous colorectal liver metastases from 1988 to 1999 were compared to the parameters of the patients who underwent colon resection followed by resection of liver metastases in a staged setting. RESULTS: 198 hepatic resections were performed, of which 112 procedures in 103 patients were done for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Twenty six patients (25%) had combined hepatic and colon resection and were compared to 86 patients with metachronous metastases who underwent colon and hepatic resection in the staging setting. Postoperative morbidity was 27 and 35%, respectively. There was no hospital mortality in the combined group vs. 2.3% in the staged group. Blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and length of postoperative stay (LOS) were similar in both groups. The 5 years cumulative survival of the group after combined surgery was 28% vs. 27% of the group after isolated hepatic resections (P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Combined colon and hepatic resection is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. It can be performed with acceptable morbidity and no perioperative mortality. The survival after combined procedure is comparable to the one achieved after staged procedure of colon resection followed by liver resection.

Is laparoscopic appendectomy safe in pregnant women?

BACKGROUND: Because of limited laboratory and clinical data, no accepted guidelines concerning the safety of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in pregnancy have been established yet. In this prospective study, we evaluated the safety and outcome of LA in pregnant women as compared with the same control group of pregnant women who underwent open appendectomy (OA) during the same period. METHODS: During the years 1996 to 1999, 11 consecutive pregnant women (mean age, 27 years; range 21-39 years; gestation age range, 7-34 weeks) who underwent LA were prospectively evaluated and compared with a matched group of 11 women (mean age, 30 years; range 18-42 years; gestation age range, 11-37 weeks) who underwent OA. The following parameters were analyzed: obstetric and gynecologic risk factors, length of procedure, perioperative complications, length of stay, and outcome of pregnancy. Both groups were well matched in age and risk factors for pregnancy loss. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the length of procedure (60 vs. 46 min) and the complications rate (one in each group) between the LA and OA groups, respectively. There was no conversion in the LA group. The length of postoperative stay was shorter in the LA group (3.6 vs 5.2 days; p = 0.05). There was no fetal loss or other adverse outcome of pregnancy in either group, and all the women in both groups had normal full-term delivery. The infants' development was normal in both groups for a mean follow-up period of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: According to this relatively small-scale study laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant women may be as safe as open appendectomy. This procedure is technically feasible in all trimesters of pregnancy and associated with the same known benefits of laparoscopic surgery that nonpregnant patients experience.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what does affect the outcome? A retrospective multifactorial regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between various factors and the postoperative outcome has not been thoroughly studied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this retrospective study was to determine which factors significantly affect patients outcome after LC. METHODS: The medical and operative records of all consecutive patients who underwent LC at our institution from 1991 to 1996 were reviewed. The effect of age, medical and surgical history, duration of procedure, and setup (urgent or elective) on the postoperative complication rate and on the length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) were analyzed using multiple linear regression and logistic regression analysis. Overall, 601 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: The factors that significantly prolonged LOS were age (p = 0.0145), acute cholecystitis (p = 0.0006), history of ischemic heart disease (p = 0.0332), and duration of procedure (p < 0.0001). A significantly higher postoperative morbidity rate was noted in patients who had a procedure longer then 2 h than in patients whose surgery required less the 2 h (13.6% vs 3.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Similarly, higher morbidity was noted in elderly patients than in younger patients (16% vs 6.1%; p = 0.0005). Other factors that significantly increased postoperative morbidity included acute cholecystitis (p = 0.023), a history of cholangitis (p = 0.018), and diabetes (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, advanced age, longer duration of procedure, and acute cholecystitis significantly increase both the postoperative morbidity and the LOS. History of ischemic heart disease significantly increases LOS, but does not increase morbidity after LC.

[Laparoscopic adrenalectomy].

Constant advances and increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery renders it applicable for adrenal surgery. The wide exposure required for open adrenal surgery makes this minimally invasive procedure an attractive and advantageous alternative. Between 1996-1999, we performed 35 laparoscopic adrenalectomies in 30 patients 20-72-years old. Indications included: Conn's syndrome--14, pheochromocytoma--11, Cushing's syndrome--6, nonfunctioning adenoma--3, and metastatic sarcoma--1. 5 underwent bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. In 3 (8.5%) the procedures were converted to open operations. Overall morbidity was 13% and there was no mortality. Mean operative time was 188 minutes, but only 130 in our last 10 cases. Mean hospital stay was 4 days and they returned to normal activity an average of 2 weeks later. According to our study and previous reports, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is feasible and safe and it may soon become the procedure of choice for adrenal tumors.

The fate of the dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Stones can be spilled from the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These stones can be left in the peritoneal cavity or trapped at the trocar site. The potential late sequel and associated morbidity are not well documented. We reviewed the records of four patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City who suffered from late complications attributed to gallstones left in the peritoneal cavity or abdominal wall. Four patients presented 1-14 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraabdominal and abdominal wall abscesses. The spillage of gallstones was noticed during the initial operation only in one of the patients. Three patients required laparotomy and open drainage of intraabdominal abscesses with drainage of pus and gallstones after failed attempts at percutaneous drainage. Two patients underwent local exploration of an abdominal wall abscess containing stones. Stones left in the abdominal cavity or trapped in trocar sites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy can cause serious late complications requiring repeated surgical interventions. Every effort should be made in order to avoid spillage of stones during dissection of the gallbladder and cystic duct and during retrieval of the gallbladder through the abdominal wall.

Placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter with routine omentectomy--does it prevent obstruction of the catheter?

OBJECTIVE: To find out if routine omentectomy reduced the incidence of obstruction and other complications of catheters inserted for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Israel. SUBJECTS: 60 patients with end stage renal failure who needed catheters for CAPD. INTERVENTION: Routine omentectomy during insertion of the catheter, usually under local anaesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short and long term morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: No patient died as a result of the procedure. The catheter obstructed in only one patient (2%) during a mean follow-up period of 28 months (range 2-108), and 90% of the catheters survived one year. CONCLUSIONS: Routine omentectomy during insertion of a catheter for CAPD under local anaesthesia is safe and the incidence of obstruction is low. Prospective randomised studies are needed before it can be recommended as the procedure of choice.

Perforated appendicitis within an inguinal hernia: case report and review of the literature.

The finding of the vermiform appendix within an inguinal hernia sac is not uncommon. However, it is rare to find a perforated appendix within an inguinal hernia. An unusual case of an incarcerated and perforated appendix within an inguinal hernia complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess is reported herein. Perforated appendix as a cause of abscess was revealed during abdominal exploration. Clinicians are encouraged to be aware of this unusual entity, which is rarely recognized before exploration.

Pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. A retrospective study of 28 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To attempt to reduce the frequency and severity of postoperative anastomotic leakage from pancreaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center, department of general surgery, in the 31-month period between April 1, 1993, and November 30, 1995. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Twenty-eight patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. Indications for surgery included carcinoma of the pancreas (n = 14), carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (n = 8), distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3), duodenal carcinoma (n = 1), an islet cell tumor (n = 1), and cystadenoma of the pancreas (n = 1). The median patient age was 62 years (range, 34-76 years). The median duration of surgery was 6.75 hours (range, 4-12 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An anastomotic leak was defined as a recovery of more than 50 mL/d of amylase-rich fluid from the drains (> 3 times the normal plasma levels) on or after the seventh postoperative day. RESULTS: An anastomotic leak that lasted between 7 and 14 days developed in 4 patients (14.3%). A pancreatic leak led to no major morbidity. In all cases, leakage was treated by temporary restriction of oral intake and nasogastric drainage. An intra-abdominal collection did not develop in any of these 4 patients. No patient required another surgical procedure for a pancreatic fistula or abdominal collection. One patient (3.6%) died postoperatively. The median duration of the postoperative hospital stay was 20 days (range, 12-43 days), and all patients were discharged from the hospital after restoration of normal oral feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe method for reconstruction of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors. It results in an acceptable incidence of anastomotic leakage that is easily controlled by conservative measures.

Acute perigraft seroma simulating anastomotic bleeding of a PTFE graft applied as an arteriovenous shunt for hemodialysis.

Perigraft seroma is an uncommonly reported complication of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts applied as an arteriovenous shunt for hemodialysis. It usually presents as a soft tissue swelling around the arterial end of the graft and occurs within 30 days after implantation. An unusual presentation of perigraft seroma occurring immediately after implantation is reported herein.

Hepatic arterial bolus chemotherapy for colorectal metastases using an implantable port.

Twenty-one patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic artery infusion (HAI) port implantation for regional chemotherapy with bolus injections of 5-FU, LV and fast drip of cisplatin. Ten of the 21 patients had previously failed systemic chemotherapy before HAI. Toxicity was moderate and no need for modulation of the chemotherapeutic dose was required. The objective response rate of the whole group was 52.4%. The patients, who had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, had a significantly higher response rate of 81.8% compared to patients treated previously by systemic chemotherapy, who had a response rate of 20% (p=0.0089). In addition, there was a difference in cumulative survival between these two groups. The HAI combined chemotherapy with 5-FU, LV and cisplatin given by bolus injection through an implantable port is effective therapy with similar response rate but considerable reduced toxicity compared to continuous HAI with FUdR. We assume that this therapy might prolong survival significantly especially in patients not treated before by systemic chemotherapy.