Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pain ; 6(10): 644-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16202956

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Twenty eight subjects with refractory, moderate to severe peripheral neuropathic pain participated in an open label prospective trial examining perceived analgesic effect, patient satisfaction, and safety of topical amitriptyline 2%/ketamine 1% cream. Outcome measures included an 11-point numerical rating scale for pain intensity (NRS-PI), a 5-point satisfaction scale, blood chemistry screen, drug and metabolite levels, urinalyses, electrocardiogram (ECG), and physical examination. Adverse events were monitored. Twenty-one subjects completed the trial. At 6 months, subjects reported an average long-term reduction in pain of 34% (standard deviation [SD] = 37%); 5 subjects (25%) achieved 50% or greater reduction in pain and 1 subject (5%) achieved 100% reduction in pain. At 12 months, the average reduction in pain was 37% (SD = 40%); 7 subjects (40%) achieved 50% or greater pain reduction. At the end of the study, 89% of subjects rated their satisfaction as 3/5 or greater and 2 subjects (10%) were pain free. Minimal adverse events were reported and there were no serious medication related adverse events. Blood levels revealed minimal systemic absorption. In conclusion, topical 2% amitriptyline/ 1% ketamine cream was associated with long-term reduction (6-12 months) in perceived pain, moderate to complete satisfaction, and was well tolerated in treatment of neuropathic pain. There was no significant systemic absorption of amitriptyline or ketamine. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that topical 2% amitriptyline/1% ketamine, given over 6-12 months, is associated with long-term perceived analgesic effectiveness in treatment of neuropathic pain. Antidepressants and ketamine both produce multiple pharmacologic effects that may contribute to peripheral analgesia; such actions include block of peripheral N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, local anesthetic properties, and interactions with adenosine systems.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/administration & dosage , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Adenosine/metabolism , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amitriptyline/adverse effects , Amitriptyline/blood , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/blood , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/blood , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Ketamine/adverse effects , Ketamine/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold/drug effects , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/drug effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pain ; 103(1-2): 111-7, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12749965

ABSTRACT

Adenosine analogs produce analgesic actions in nociceptive paradigms and alleviate manifestations of neuropathic pain in nerve injury models in rodents. In humans, previous work indicates an analgesic effect for adenosine administered intravenously in postoperative and neuropathic pain. In this double blind placebo controlled crossover trial, we used an enriched enrolment design to determine the effects of intravenous adenosine (50 microg/kg/min over 60min) on neuropathic pain. In Phase 1 of the trial, adenosine was administered in an open label manner, while in Phase 2 adenosine was administered in a double blind placebo controlled manner to 23 adenosine responders who had experienced a 30% or greater response in the open trial. Outcome measures included the McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), which generates a pain rating index (PRI), and contains a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain intensity, the neuropathy pain scale (NPS), and a VAS for pain relief. Subjects also graded the degree of allodynia and hyperalgesia using a VAS. Adenosine led to a significant reduction in spontaneous pain according to the MPQ-PRI, the MPQ-VAS and the VAS for pain relief. The NPS showed a pattern similar to the MPQ-PRI, with statistically significant reductions in scales 1 (intensity), 3 (hot), 6 (sensitive), 7 (itchy) and 9 (unpleasant). Adenosine also led to a significant reduction in pinprick hyperalgesia, but not in allodynia. Three patients from Phase 1 of the trial experienced long term resolution of their pain following intravenous adenosine (5,16,25 months). The results of this study support previous reports that indicate intravenous adenosine alleviates neuropathic pain and hyperalgesia.


Subject(s)
Adenosine/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Adenosine/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Infusions, Intravenous/methods , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold/drug effects , Placebos , Sensation , Sensory Thresholds/drug effects , Time , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...