Evaluation of the Ototoxicity Potential of Once-Daily, Single-Entity Hydrocodone in Patients with Chronic Pain: Results of Two Phase-3 Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND: Use/misuse of the opioid combination hydrocodone-acetaminophen has been associated with permanent hearing loss. Although reports have been rare, this potential effect can have significant detrimental effect on patients' overall quality of life. To date, the ototoxic effect of hydrocodone alone has not been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: In this report, we aimed to evaluate the potential ototoxicity of a novel, single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet (Hysingla® ER; HYD). STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Audiology clinics in US. METHODS: Results from 1207 patients in two phase 3 clinical studies were evaluated: A placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal design in patients with chronic low back pain, and an open-label, long-term, safety study in patients with chronic nonmalignant and non-neuropathic pain. Comprehensive audiologic assessments (comprising pure-tone air-conduction audiometry in the conventional [0.25-8 kHz] and ultra-high [10-16 kHz] frequencies, pure-tone bone-conduction audiometry, tympanometry, speech reception thresholds, and word recognition) were conducted at baseline and end-of-studies; air-conduction audiometry was conducted periodically during the studies. All audiologic assessments were performed in audiology clinics in the United States by licensed audiologists. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in pure-tone air-conduction thresholds in the conventional frequencies during the studies. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT01400139 and NCT01452529. RESULTS: During the studies, mean changes from baseline in air-conduction thresholds were clinically unremarkable. Bidirectional variability across all test frequencies was observed; 82% of patients did not experience significant threshold changes during the studies, 7% had potential hearing decrement, and 10% experienced hearing sensitivity improvement. No notable differences were observed between patients receiving HYD and placebo or between different HYD doses. CONCLUSION: No ototoxic signal was observed for single-entity hydrocodone tablets at the dosages and treatment durations investigated. Key words: Audiologic monitoring, clinical trials, hydrocodone, opioids, ototoxicity monitoring, sensorineural hearing loss.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Extended-Release (ER) Hydrocodone in Individuals Previously Receiving ER Morphine for Chronic Pain.

OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis examined the effectiveness and safety of hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain who were previously taking extended-release morphine (morphine ER) for pain management. STUDY DESIGN: The primary analysis was an open-label, 12-month study. SETTING: The study was conducted in 88 sites in the United States. METHODS: The study was approved by an institutional review board. Eligible patients were enrolled and titrated to a once-daily dose of HYD 20, 40, 60, 80, or 120 mg for a 45-day period. The subgroup of patients in this report was using morphine ER prior to study entry. After achieving a stable HYD daily dose, patients entered a 12-month maintenance period during which additional dose adjustment could be made and nonopioid or short-acting opioid medications could be received. Average pain over the last 24 hours was recorded daily (on a scale of 0 to 10) Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form, which assessed pain severity and the interference of pain in daily life, every 4 weeks during the maintenance period. Safety was assessed routinely. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients who switched from morphine ER to HYD, 19 entered the maintenance period. At study entry, mean "average pain over the last 24 hours" was scored as 5.21. This was reduced to 3.90 by the time patients entered the maintenance phase; this level of pain control was maintained over the 12-month period, with 16 patients requiring no further HYD dose adjustment. BPI scores decreased for both pain severity and pain interference during the maintenance period. HYD was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this subgroup analysis suggest that rotation from morphine ER to once-daily HYD in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain maintains or improves pain relief and does not increase safety concerns.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone in patients of ≥75 years of age with moderate to severe nonmalignant and nonneuropathic pain.

In elderly (≥75 years) individuals, age-associated physiologic changes and a higher prevalence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and increased susceptibility to medication-induced side effects complicate pain management. Hysingla® ER (HYD) is a once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone formulation approved for the treatment of chronic pain that is insufficiently controlled by alternative treatments. In this post-hoc analysis of a previously reported study, the effectiveness and safety of HYD for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic pain among the elderly (≥75 years) for a 52-week duration was investigated. HYD dose administered during the maintenance period-remained relatively stable and provided clinically meaningful decreases in mean "pain over the last 24 h" and pain interference scores. Patients achieved pain control without additional non-study opioid use at the end of the study. Adverse events were typical of opioids. In summary, HYD provided clinically meaningful reduction of pain scores in elderly patients that were maintained over a 52-week period.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone over 76 weeks of an open-label study in patients with chronic noncancer and nonneuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term use of Hysingla(®) ER (HYD), a single-entity, extended-release, once-daily hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic noncancer and nonneuropathic pain. METHODS: This open-label study consisted of a dose-titration period (up to 45 days), a 52-week maintenance period and a 24-week extension period. Opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced patients with controlled or uncontrolled chronic pain conditions were treated with HYD 20-120 mg daily. Supplemental nonopioid and short-acting opioid analgesics were permitted. This paper presents the results of 106 patients who continued HYD treatment for up to 76 weeks. Primary safety measures included the incidence of adverse events, as well as audiologic, clinical laboratory and electrocardiogram measurements. Effectiveness was measured by the change between baseline and the overall 76-week treatment period in "average pain over the last 24 h" (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine), Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form survey, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised and concomitant nonstudy opioid analgesic use. RESULTS: Among 410 patients who completed the maintenance period, 106 continued into the extension. Of these, 83 (78%) completed the entire 76-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events were typical of those observed with µ-opioid agonists. No study drug abuse or diversion was reported. Clinically important analgesia and functional improvement were achieved during the dose-titration period and were maintained in most patients throughout 76 weeks without the need for continued HYD dose increases or changes in concomitant nonstudy opioid analgesics. The mean pain score was 6.1 at baseline, 3.8 at the end of the dose titration period and 3.8 through 76 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: HYD was generally well tolerated. No unexpected safety concerns emerged. Pain control was sustained throughout 76 weeks of treatment.

Buprenorphine Transdermal System Improves Sleep Quality and Reduces Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: Results from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of buprenorphine (Butrans®) transdermal System (BTDS) treatment on sleep outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Two enriched-enrollment, randomized-withdrawal, double-blind, controlled trials examined BTDS treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Trial I evaluated BTDS 10 and 20 mcg/hour against a placebo control among opioid-naïve patients. Trial II compared BTDS 20 mcg/hour against a lower-dose control (BTDS 5 mcg/hour) among opioid-experienced patients. The patient-reported Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) assessed overall sleep quality (Sleep Problems Index [SPI]), Disturbance, and other sleep outcomes. In each trial, MOS-SS scores were compared between target treatment and control arms during the 12-week double-blind phase. Correspondence of changes in sleep outcomes and pain severity and the degree to which pain reduction mediates treatment impact on sleep outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale scores were collected from 541 (Trial I) and 441 (Trial II) patients prior to randomization and from 369 (Trial I) and 274 (Trial II) patients at week 12. Patients receiving target treatment showed statistically significantly more improvement in SPI and Disturbance scores at 12 weeks than their respective controls (Ps < 0.05). Improvements in SPI and Disturbance for target treatment arms were statistically larger those of the controls by week 4 of the double-blind phase. The clinical significance of these differences was not determined. Pain reduction predicted improvements in sleep outcomes. CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine Transdermal System improved sleep quality and disturbance for opioid-naïve and opioid-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Benefits of BTDS for these sleep outcomes emerged within 4 weeks and were maintained over the entire 12-week treatment period.

A Subgroup Analysis Found no Diminished Response to Buprenorphine Transdermal System Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Classified with Depression.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain (CP) patients with depression typically exhibit worse post-treatment outcomes than nondepressed CP patients. The cause is often assumed to reflect a differential response to treatment, neglecting other potential explanations, such as the continuation of differences in pretreatment outcomes. This post hoc analysis examines whether worse post-treatment outcomes for depressed patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are driven by reduced treatment efficacy. METHODS: Data were from opioid-naïve adult patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of Butrans(®) (buprenorphine) Transdermal System (BTDS) for pain relief. Depression screening was based on baseline SF-36v2 Mental Health subscale scores. Patient-reported measures of pain severity, pain interference, quality of life, sleep problems, and functional disability were administered at screening and during the study. Differential treatment efficacy for each outcome was examined using analysis of covariance models that included interaction terms between treatment arm and depression status. RESULTS: At baseline, patients classified as depressed showed greater pain interference, lower quality of life, more sleep problems, and greater functional disability than nondepressed patients; the two groups did not differ in pain severity. No statistically significant interactions between treatment arm and depression status were observed. The direction of improvement post-treatment favored the depressed group on nine of seventeen outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results do not support a differential response to BTDS treatment between depressed and nondepressed CLBP patients across a variety of patient-reported outcomes. These findings raise the question of whether depressed mood actually moderates the effectiveness of treatment in CP patients.

12-Month safety and effectiveness of once-daily hydrocodone tablets formulated with abuse-deterrent properties in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the long-term safety and effectiveness of Hysingla™ ER, single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate tablets formulated with abuse-deterrent properties (HYD), offering a new treatment option for appropriate patients with chronic pain. DESIGN: An open-label study with a dose-titration period (up to 45 days) and a maintenance period (12 months). PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: A total of 922 patients with chronic nonmalignant and non-neuropathic moderate to severe pain received open-label HYD tablets 20-120 mg; 728 of these achieved a stabilized dose of HYD at the end of dose-titration and entered the maintenance period. RESULTS: The safety profile was similar to that of other oral opioid analgesics, without new or unexpected safety concerns. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; ≥ 5 percent) were those commonly associated with the use of systemic µ-opioid analgesics, including nausea, constipation, vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, somnolence, and headache. There were 77 (8 percent) patients with a total of 109 nonfatal treatment-emergent serious AEs. Few patients discontinued due to lack of therapeutic effect overall (6 percent), especially during the 12-month maintenance period (4 percent). Pain relief, sleep, functional health, and activities of daily living all improved at the end of the dose-titration period with HYD. These improvements were maintained through the 12-month maintenance period with stable HYD doses and without increase in concomitant supplemental analgesic medications. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study demonstrated the safety and long-term maintenance of analgesic effect of HYD without continued need for dose increase.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of single-entity, once-daily hydrocodone tablets in patients with uncontrolled moderate to severe chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal design was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single-entity, once-daily hydrocodone 20 to 120 mg tablets (HYD) in opioid-naive and opioid-experienced patients with uncontrolled moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was week 12 pain intensity scores (11-point scale, 0 = no pain) using a mixed effect model with repeated measures incorporating a pattern mixture model framework. Responder analysis was a secondary endpoint. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 905 patients who were treated with HYD during the open-label titration period, 588 (65%) were randomized to continue to receive HYD (n = 296, 20 - 120 mg taken once daily, average daily dose 57 mg) or a matching placebo (n = 292). HYD demonstrated superior pain reduction (p = 0.0016); this result was supported by sensitivity analyses using different approaches to handling missing data. Proportions of patients achieving ≥ 30 and ≥ 50% improvement in pain from screening to week 12 also favored HYD (p = 0.0033 and 0.0225, respectively). HYD was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: HYD was shown to be an efficacious treatment for CLBP in this study. There were no new or unexpected safety concerns detected.

Buprenorphine transdermal system compared with placebo reduces interference in functioning for chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A post-hoc analysis used data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measured pain interference at screening, following a run-in period, and during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Statistical analyses examined treatment arm differences (BTDS vs placebo) for the following: BPI Interference subscale items and subscale scores at the trial end point (week 12); patterns of change in the Interference subscale scores over time; proportions of patients indicating mild or no interference following treatment; and proportions of patients showing improvement (30%, 50%, 2-point, or 4-point change in score from screening to week 12) for each item and subscale. RESULTS: Mean scores for BPI Interference items and Interference subscale were significantly lower (ie, indicated less interference) for BTDS than for placebo (all P < 0.001). Treatment arm differences in Interference subscale scores emerged within 4 weeks of treatment. The BTDS patients were significantly more likely to indicate mild/no interference on 5 of 7 Interference subscale items following treatment (P < 0.05). For most comparisons, BTDS patients were significantly more likely to show criterion-level improvements in Interference item and subscale scores (P < 0.05 for differences). DISCUSSION: Results indicate the efficacy of BTDS treatment, compared with placebo, for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning in patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The advantage of BTDS was observed within 4 weeks of treatment, and was maintained throughout the 12-week treatment phase.

The impact of buprenorphine transdermal delivery system on activities of daily living among patients with chronic low back pain: an application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

OBJECTIVES: The buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (BTDS) is indicated for reduction of pain in moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), which can affect patients' ability to perform routine activities of daily living (ADLs). This post hoc analysis of clinical trial data examines the impact of BTDS treatment on CLBP patients' ability to perform ADLs that relate to functioning with low back pain. METHODS: Data are drawn from a multicenter, enriched enrollment, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 12-week trial of BTDS for pain control among opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe CLBP. The 23 selected ADLs are those that (1) appear in the Low Back Pain Core Set of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and (2) link to the content of 3 patient-reported outcome instruments administered during the trial. Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of BTDS patients' ability to perform each ADL at 12 weeks, controlling for baseline ability, relative to placebo. RESULTS: The ORs for 10 ADLs related to sleeping, lifting, bending, and working reached multiplicity-adjusted statistical significance and indicated a greater ability to perform ADLs among BTDS users than among the placebo group. These 10 ORs ranged from 1.9 (no physical health-related restrictions on the kind of work performed) to 2.4 (being able to sleep undisturbed by pain). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that for patients with moderate to severe CLBP, 12 weeks use of BTDS improves the ability to carry out certain ADLs related to sleeping, lifting, bending, and working.

Application site adverse events associated with the buprenorphine transdermal system: a pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of application site reactions (ASRs) for patients treated with the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in chronic pain studies. METHODS: The incidences of ASRs during treatment with BTDS were examined using (a) integrated data from 16 controlled and uncontrolled Phase III chronic pain studies (N = 6566), (b) a subset of integrated data that focused on the double-blind phases of five enriched, placebo-controlled studies (n = 1806) and (c) data from an international postmarketing drug safety database. These data were compared with the ASR data reported in the full prescribing information of other transdermal patches marketed in the US. RESULTS: Among the 6566 patients, the overall incidence of ASRs was 23.4%, of which 98.3% were mild to moderate in intensity, none were serious and 4.4% led to treatment discontinuation. Rates of severe and inflammatory ASRs were low. Among the 1806 patients, ASR rates were higher with BTDS (16.6%) than placebo transdermal system (12.7%). Among the 6566 patients, the 1806 patients, and the postmarketing data, the most common ASRs seen were pruritus, erythema and rash. Incidences of most ASRs for other selected transdermal products were 17% or lower. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates of ASRs in patients treated with BTDS were low and infrequently led to discontinuation. Severe and inflammatory-type ASRs were not common. The ASR profile of BTDS was comparable with those of other transdermal patches.

Buprenorphine transdermal system and quality of life in opioid-experienced patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of 12 weeks of treatment with Butrans® (buprenorphine) transdermal system (BTDS) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and the maintenance of effects over 52 weeks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, enriched, double-blind (DB), randomized trial comparing BTDS 20 µg/h (BTDS 20) against 5 µg/h (BTDS 5) for treatment of opioid-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP, including a 52-week open-label (OL) extension phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QoL was measured with the SF-36v2 survey before and after an OL run-in period with BTDS 20, three times during the DB phase, and seven times over the extension phase. This post hoc analysis tested for SF-36v2 score differences between treatment groups during the DB phase and maintenance of effects over the extension phase. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, BTDS 20 produced larger improvements than BTDS 5 in role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain and overall physical QoL (p < 0.01). Treatment group differences in overall physical QoL were sustained throughout the DB phase. Quality-of-life improvements associated with BTDS 20 persisted through the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that opioid-experienced moderate-to-severe CLBP patients receiving BTDS 20 exhibited better QoL than patients receiving BTDS 5.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the impact of the 7-day buprenorphine transdermal system on health-related quality of life in opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the impact of treatment with Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) on the health-related quality of life for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), and the correspondence between quality of life and pain. A multicenter, enriched, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated BTDS 10 and 20 µg/hour for treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The SF-36v2 survey, which measures 8 domains of quality of life, was administered at screening and following an open-label run-in period with BTDS and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the DB phase. Post hoc analyses compared SF-36v2 scores between BTDS and placebo groups during the DB phase. Condition burden was examined through comparisons with a U.S. general population sample. Correlations examined the correspondence between quality of life and pain measures. BTDS produced larger improvements than placebo at 12 weeks in all quality-of-life domains (Ps < .05). Treatment group differences in both physical and mental quality of life emerged by 4 weeks. Patients' pretreatment quality of life was worse than that in the general population (Ps < .05); only BTDS treatment eliminated deficits in pain, social functioning, and role limitations due to emotional health. Improvements in quality of life were moderately associated with pain reduction. These data suggest that moderate-to-severe CLBP patients receiving BTDS exhibited better quality of life than patients receiving placebo. PERSPECTIVE: This post hoc analysis suggests that patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP treated with BTDS exhibit better health-related quality of life than those using placebo within 4 weeks of treatment, and were more likely to exhibit clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life following 12 weeks of treatment.