Feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) T2* cartilage mapping in the hip: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrashort echo time (UTE) T2* is sensitive to molecular changes within the deep calcified layer of cartilage. Feasibility of its use in the hip needs to be established to determine suitability for clinical use. PURPOSE: To establish feasibility of UTE T2* cartilage mapping in the hip and determine if differences in regional values exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI scans with UTE T2* cartilage maps were prospectively acquired on eight hips. Hip cartilage was segmented into whole and deep layers in anterosuperior, superior, and posterosuperior regions. Quantitative UTE T2* maps were analyzed (independent one-way ANOVA) and reliability was calculated (ICC). RESULTS: UTE T2* mean values (anterosuperior, superior, posterosuperior): full femoral layer (19.55, 18.43, 16.84 ms) (P=0.004), full acetabular layer (19.37, 17.50, 16.73 ms) (P=0.013), deep femoral layer (18.68, 17.90, 15.74 ms) (P=0.010), and deep acetabular layer (17.81, 16.18, 15.31 ms) (P=0.007). Values were higher in anterosuperior compared to posterosuperior regions (mean difference; 95% confidence interval [CI]): full femur layer (2.71 ms; 95% CI 0.91-4.51: P=0.003), deep femur layer (2.94 ms; 95% CI 0.69-5.19; P=0.009), full acetabular layer (2.63 ms 95% CI 0.55-4.72; P=0.012), and deep acetabular layer (2.50 ms; 95% CI 0.69-4.30; P=0.006). Intra-reader (ICC 0.89-0.99) and inter-reader reliability (ICC 0.63-0.96) were good to excellent for the majority of cartilage layers. CONCLUSION: UTE T2* cartilage mapping was feasible in the hip with mean values in the range of 16.84-19.55 ms in the femur and 16.73-19.37 ms in the acetabulum. Significantly higher values were present in the anterosuperior region compared to the posterosuperior region.

Open Versus Arthroscopic Surgical Management for Recalcitrant Trochanteric Bursitis: A Systematic Review.

Background: While excision of the trochanteric bursae to treat lateral hip pain has increased in popularity, no comparison exists between the surgical outcomes and complications of the open and arthroscopic techniques involving trochanteric bursectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacies and complication rates of arthroscopic and open techniques for procedures involving trochanteric bursectomy. Methods: The terms "trochanteric," "bursectomy," "arthroscopic," "open," "outcomes," and "hip" were searched in five electronic databases. Fifteen studies from 120 initial results were included. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO), pain, satisfaction, and complications were included for analysis. Results: Five hundred-two hips in 474 total patients (77.7% female) were included in this study. The average age was 54. The fourteen distinct PRO scores that were reported by the included studies improved significantly from baseline to final mean follow-up (12-70.8 months for open; 12-42 months for arthroscopic) for both approaches, demonstrating statistically significant patient benefit in a variety of hip arthroscopy settings (P > 0.05). The complication rates of all procedures ranged from 0%-33% and failure to improve pain ranged from 0%-8%. Patient satisfaction with surgery was high at 95% and 82% reported a willingness to undergo the same surgery again. No significant mean differences were found between the open and arthroscopic techniques. Conclusion: The open and arthroscopic approaches for trochanteric bursectomy are both safe and effective procedures in treating refractory lateral hip pain. No significant differences in PROs, pain, total complications, severity of complications, and total failures were seen between technique outcomes.Level of Evidence: IV.

Cognitive Training in Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past two decades, various factors have led to fewer opportunities for hands-on learning in the operating room among orthopaedic surgery trainees. Innovative training platforms using anatomic models, cadaveric specimens, and augmented reality have been devised to address this deficiency in surgical training, but such training tools are often costly with limited accessibility. Cognitive training is a low-cost training technique that improves physical performance by refining the way in which information is mentally processed and has long been used by professional athletes and world-class musicians. More recently, cognitive training tools have been developed for several orthopaedic surgery procedures, but the overall utility of cognitive training in orthopaedic surgery remains unknown. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to review the existing literature regarding the use of cognitive training in orthopaedic surgery and to summarize the results of investigations comparing cognitive training tools with other methods of learning. To that effect, the PubMed and Embase databases were systematically reviewed for articles related to cognitive training in orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: Eleven publications met the inclusion criteria, including six randomized controlled trials. Cognitive task analysis and mental rehearsal were the most common forms of cognitive training identified. All 11 publications supported the use of cognitive training in orthopaedic surgery training. In the six randomized controlled trials, the utilization of cognitive training was associated with notably improved surgical performance and increased knowledge compared with traditional methods of learning. DISCUSSION: Based on the limited evidence presented in this review, cognitive training represents a promising, low-cost adjunct to traditional orthopaedic surgery training. Further efforts should be directed at developing and evaluating additional cognitive training tools for orthopaedic surgery trainees.

Use of a 3D virtual dynamic hip model to quantify the amount of osteoplasty required in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

OBJECTIVE: Compare required osteoplasty predicted by a 3D virtual dynamic hip model in femoroacetabular impingement patients to actual osteoplasty performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on 20 consecutive FAI patients with a preoperative CT who underwent arthroscopy from October 2016 to September 2017. A 3D virtual dynamic hip model was created from the CT. The model displayed virtual osteoplasty depth required to restore physiologic range of motion on an osteoplasty map. Depths of virtual osteoplasty and actual osteoplasty at surgery were compared and correlated with alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, femoral version, and acetabular version. RESULTS: Actual femoroplasty depth correlated with alpha angle (r = 0.85, p ≤ 0.001) and actual acetabuloplasty depth correlated with lateral center edge angle (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Virtual osteoplasty depth did not correlate with alpha angle (p = 0.25), lateral center edge angle (p = 0.50), femoral version (p = 0.09), or acetabular version (p = 0.09). The 3D model predicted a mean virtual osteoplasty of 6.2 ±â€¯0.3 mm compared to mean actual osteoplasty of 5.9 ±â€¯1.1 mm. There was no significant difference between the two means (p = 0.26), though there was a significant difference in variance (p = 0.001). There was poor test reliability between virtual osteoplasty compared with actual osteoplasty (ICC = 0.30). CONCLUSION: 3D model predicted virtual osteoplasty depths varied with actual osteoplasty and was independent of 2D measurements.

Preoperative Use of a 3D Printed Model for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery and Its Effect on Planned Osteoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect that preoperative use of 3D printed models has on planned osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This experimental study utilizing retrospective data included 10 consecutive patients from July 1, 2013, to January 1, 2015, with a clinical diagnosis of FAI and imaging consisting of radiographs, CT scans, and MR images. Three-dimensional models of each patient's affected hip were printed to scale from CT data. Two orthopedic surgeons evaluated each patient in a routine preoperative manner. The effect of the 3D models in altering the planned osteoplasty was then determined. Proportions of osteoplasty change were calculated at various positions, and categoric variables were assessed with the chi-square test for independence. RESULTS: Proportions of osteoplasty changes ranged from 20% to 55% at femoral positions (greatest at lateral and depth positions) and 35-75% at acetabular positions (greatest at anterior and depth positions). More osteoplasty changes occurred in patients with alpha angles of 60° or more (p = 0.00030) and without a radiographic crossover sign (p = 0.0075). We found no difference in the proportion of osteoplasty changes when stratifying by lateral center edge angle and coxa profunda (p = 0.190 and 0.109, respectively). The planned osteoplasty was changed for at least one reader in 9/10 (90%) femurs and 10/10 (100%) acetabula. CONCLUSION: Use of 3D models in preoperative planning can change both the extent and location of planned osteoplasty for FAI surgery and is particularly influential in patients with alpha angles of 60° or more and without a radiographic crossover.