Comparison of three methods of penile vibratory stimulation for semen retrieval in men with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, three-way crossover design. OBJECTIVE: Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) is recommended as the first line of treatment for semen retrieval in anejaculatory men with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study compared ejaculatory success rates and patient preference for three methods of PVS within the same group of men with SCI. SETTING: Major medical university. METHODS: Fifteen men with SCI each received three methods of PVS. Method 1 (M1): applying one FertiCare Personal device to the dorsum or frenulum of the glans penis; Method 2 (M2): 'sandwiching' the glans penis between two FertiCare devices; Method 3 (M3): sandwiching the glans penis between the two vibrating surfaces of the Viberect-X3 device. The order of M1, M2 and M3 was varied to control for sequencing effects. Following each PVS trial, subjects rated their experience on a questionnaire with scaled responses. RESULTS: Ejaculation success rates were high for each method; however, ejaculation latency was significantly longer with M3 compared with M1 or M2. In survey questions about patient preference, there were no significant differences between M1 and M2. In contrast, M3 was rated lower than M1 and M2 in patient preference. Semen collection may be more difficult with the Viberect device. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, we recommend attempting PVS with one FertiCare device. If that fails, use two FertiCare devices. Although the Viberect-X3 was preferred less by patients, it had similar efficacy as the Ferticare vibrator(s) and may be suitable for home use by some patients.

Male fertility following spinal cord injury: an update.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) occurs most often in young men at the peak of their reproductive health. The majority of men with SCI cannot father children naturally. Three major complications contribute to infertility in men with SCI: erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction, and abnormal semen quality. Erectile dysfunction can be managed by regimens available to the general population, including oral administration of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, intracavernosal injections, vacuum devices, and penile prostheses. Semen may be obtained from anejaculatory men with SCI via the medically assisted ejaculation methods of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) or electroejaculation (EEJ). Sperm retrieval is also possible via prostate massage or surgical sperm retrieval. Most men with SCI have abnormal semen quality characterized by normal sperm concentrations but abnormally low sperm motility and viability. Accessory gland dysfunction has been proposed as the cause of these abnormalities. Leukocytospermia is evident in most SCI patients. Additionally, elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and elevated concentrations of inflammasome components are found in their semen. Neutralization of these constituents has resulted in improved sperm motility. There is a recent and alarming trend in the management of infertility in couples with SCI male partners. Although many men with SCI have sufficient motile sperm in their ejaculates for attempting intrauterine insemination (IUI) or even intravaginal insemination, surgical sperm retrieval is often introduced as the first and only sperm retrieval method for these couples. Surgical sperm retrieval commits the couple to the most advanced, expensive, and invasive method of assisted conception: in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Couples should be informed of all options, including semen retrieval by PVS or EEJ. Intravaginal insemination or IUI should be considered when indicated.

Neutralization of ASC improves sperm motility in men with spinal cord injury.

STUDY QUESTION: Does neutralization of apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation and recruitment domain (ASC) improve sperm motility in men with spinal cord injury (SCI)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Neutralization of ASC improves sperm motility in men with SCI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Semen of men with SCI contains normal sperm concentrations but abnormally low sperm motility. Inflammatory cytokines, activated via the inflammasome complex, are contributory. A key component of the inflammasome is ASC. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective study included semen samples collected from 32 men with SCI. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: At a major university medical center, untreated semen was compared with semen treated with anti-ASC polyclonal antibody. Semen treated with IgG was used as a control. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Addition of anti-ASC polyclonal antibody to semen significantly increased mean sperm motility from 11.5% (95% CI, 6.3-16.7) to 18.3% (95% CI, 11.8-24.8). Improvements were most pronounced in the subgroup whose starting motility ranged between 6 and 40%. In this subgroup, the mean sperm motility improved from 13.3% (95% CI, 9.3-17.3) to 23.9% (95% CI, 14.7-23.0). Sperm motility did not improve after treatment with IgG. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by the small sample size as this is a rare population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Blockade of the inflammasome via treatment with anti-ASC improved sperm motility in men with SCI. In doing so, this treatment significantly increased their total motile sperm count. This is the first study to demonstrate that interference with the inflammasome improves sperm motility in men with SCI. This treatment has potential as a therapeutic intervention. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Grant # 224598, the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miami, FL, USA. R.W.K. and J.P.d.R.V. hold a patent for the treatment of inflammation after central nervous system injury using antibodies against inflammasome proteins. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Safety and efficacy of a new device for inducing ejaculation in men with spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. OBJECTIVES: Male infertility is a common sequela of spinal cord injury (SCI). Fatherhood is a goal in this group of young patients; however, most are anejaculatory. Penile vibratory stimulation is recommended as the first line of treatment for this condition. Our study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new device designed to induce ejaculation in these patients. SETTING: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miami, FL, USA. METHODS: The Viberect-X3 (Reflexonic, Frederick, MD, USA) was applied to 30 consecutive anejaculatory men with SCI whose level of injury was T10 and rostral. RESULTS: The ejaculatory success was 77% (23/30). No adverse events occurred, and there were no malfunctions of the device. CONCLUSION: In this first report on the efficacy of the Viberect-X3 for treatment of anejaculation in men with SCI, we conclude that the device is safe and effective for inducing ejaculation in men with SCI. Recommendation of the Viberect-X3 versus other devices intended for this purpose should not be made until randomized controlled trials are performed.

Semen quality in ejaculates produced by masturbation in men with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: Most men with spinal cord injury are anejaculatory. Much has been reported about their semen quality collected by penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation (EEJ). What is not well-described is the nature of semen quality in SCI patients who can ejaculate by masturbation. This study was performed to understand the degree to which their semen quality differed from that of anejaculatory SCI patients versus that of healthy non-SCI control subjects. SETTING: University of Miami. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of Male Fertility Research Program participants from 1991 to 2011. RESULTS: Of 528 SCI subjects, 444 met inclusion criteria of completing an algorithm in which ejaculation occurred by masturbation (n=43), PVS (n=243), or EEJ (n=158). Sperm motility was higher in the SCI-masturbation group (36.9%) than the PVS group (25.9%, P<0.001) or EEJ group (15.0%, P<0.001), but lower compared with a control group of 61 non-SCI healthy men who collected their semen by masturbation (58.0%, P<0.001). The SCI-masturbation group had similar antegrade sperm concentration (83.3×10(6) cc(-1)) as the PVS group (77.4×10(6) cc(-1)) and control group (82.0×10(6) cc(-1)), but higher than the EEJ group (49.8×10(6) cc(-1), P<0.001). The SCI-masturbation group had significantly more men with incomplete injuries (84%) than the PVS group (54%, P<0.01) or EEJ group (41%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first report focusing on semen quality obtained by masturbation in men with SCI. Sperm motility was higher in men with SCI who could, versus could not, ejaculate by masturbation. Completeness of injury may contribute to this difference.

Anejaculatory infertility due to multiple sclerosis.

There are few reports of pregnancy outcomes in couples with anejaculatory infertility secondary to multiple sclerosis and no longitudinal reports of semen quality in this population. We report our experience with one such case. The couple achieved two live births from spermatozoa obtained with electroejaculation: the first by intrauterine insemination and the second by in vitro fertilisation with intracytoplasmic sperm injection of donor oocytes. Linear regression analysis showed no progressive decline in semen parameters across 26 semen retrievals performed over 7.7 years. Years of disease do not appear to cause progressive decline in semen quality.

Male infertility and adult polycystic kidney disease--revisited: case report and current literature review.

Adult polycystic kidney disease (APKD) is one of the most common inherited disorders affecting one in 800-1000 live births. Extra-renal manifestation of APKD is not uncommon. Cysts involving the male and female reproductive system have been reported. However, fertility is affected only in male subjects. Among cysts involving the reproductive system, seminal vesicle cysts have been reported to be the most common. The effect of seminal vesicle cysts on male fertility has been controversial. Current literature reports that majority of men remain fertile. However, uraemia and its implications on fertility and abnormal semen parameters in men with seminal vesicle cysts must be taken into consideration. We herein present two patients with APKD with contrasting semen parameters and also review the current literature.

The choice of assisted ejaculation method is relevant for the diagnosis of azoospermia in men with spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of research data collected over >18 years at our center. OBJECTIVES: Examine results of repeated semen retrievals in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) who were initially found to be azoospermic. SETTING: Major university medical center. METHODS: Three different groups were analyzed in this study. Group 1 (n = 15) consisted of patients who were found to be azoospermic after the first ejaculation obtained by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) and who had subsequent ejaculates obtained by PVS. Group 2 (n = 8) consisted of patients who were found to be azoospermic after the first ejaculation obtained by PVS and who had subsequent ejaculates obtained by electroejaculation (EEJ). Group 3 (n = 18) consisted of patients who were found to be azoospermic after the first ejaculation obtained by EEJ and who had subsequent ejaculates obtained by EEJ. RESULTS: In group 1 (PVS-PVS), the second ejaculate contained sperm in none of the 15 patients. In group 2 (PVS-EEJ), the second ejaculate contained sperm in three of eight patients. In group 3 (EEJ-EEJ), the second EEJ resulted in semen with sperm in 6 of 18 patients. In the 388 study subjects, the overall prevalence of azoospermia was 7.0%. CONCLUSION: In a study of a large group of subjects with SCI, the vast majority had normal sperm concentrations. In the minority who were azoospermic on their first ejaculate, and who were past the acute phase of injury, obtaining a second ejaculate by EEJ versus PVS may be a reasonable step before proceeding to surgical sperm retrieval.

Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. SETTING: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n=123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n=204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. RESULTS: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). CONCLUSION: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. SPONSORSHIP: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.

Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods.

PURPOSE: Since the introduction of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, asymptomatic men often undergo transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. This procedure may cause significant discomfort, which may limit the number of biopsies. We performed a randomized prospective study to compare periprostatic infiltration with 1% lidocaine with intrarectal instillation of 2% lidocaine gel before prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1999 to July 2000, 150 men underwent prostate biopsy at the Miami Veterans Administration and Jackson Memorial Hospital. Experienced senior residents performed all biopsies. Patients were randomized into 2 groups depending on the method of anesthetic delivery. A visual analog scale was used to assess the pain score. Statistical analysis of pain scores was performed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy was done in 150 cases. There was a statistical difference in the mean pain score after periprostatic infiltration and intrarectal instillation (2.4 versus 3.7, p = 0.00002) with patients receiving periprostatic infiltration reporting significantly less pain. CONCLUSIONS: Men should have the opportunity to receive local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy with the goal of decreasing the discomfort associated with this procedure. Our prospective randomized study indicates that ultrasound guided periprostatic nerve block with 1% lidocaine provides anesthesia superior to the intrarectal placement of lidocaine gel.

Interposition flaps in transabdominal vesicovaginal fistula repairs: are they really necessary?

Objectives. To evaluate the use of interposition flaps in repairing vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) of benign and malignant etiologies. Interposition flaps are not routinely used in the repair of VVFs when the surrounding tissues appear healthy and well-vascularized, such as in a benign etiology.Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 37 women (mean age 49.1 years) at our institution who underwent transabdominal repair of their VVF by urologic surgeons between August 1978 and June 1999. The preoperative and postoperative medical records were reviewed.Results. Of the 37 VVFs repaired transabdominally, 29 had a benign etiology (25 related to gynecologic procedures) and 8 a malignant etiology (all related to gynecologic neoplasia). Of the 29 benign VVFs, an interposition flap was used in 10 repairs with all 10 successful (100%). The remaining 19 benign VVF repairs were performed without using a flap, with 12 successful (63%). Of the 8 malignant fistulas, an interposition flap was used in 2 repairs with both successful (100%). The remaining 6 malignant VVF repairs were performed without a flap, with 4 successful (67%).Conclusions. The results of our study indicate a higher success rate for transabdominal VVF repairs performed with an interposition flap (100% success rate at our institution). This observation holds true regardless of the appearance of healthy surrounding tissue or, more importantly, a benign or malignant etiology. We recommend interposition flaps in transabdominal repairs of VVFs, even in the cases of benign fistulas with well-preserved surrounding tissue.

MAG3-F0 scintigraphy in decision making for emergency intervention in renal colic after helical CT positive for a urolith.

UNLABELLED: Patients with renal colic are evaluated with clinical, laboratory, and imaging methods for stratification for emergency decompression, medical treatment, or discharge and follow up. The current standard practice is heavily based on unenhanced helical CT for detecting uroliths. However, the presence of a urolith does not necessarily mean that the kidney is obstructed and requires emergency decompression. In this study, technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) diuretic scintirenography was used to detect obstruction in patients with renal colic. The contribution of this test to patient management after positive findings from helical CT was also studied. METHODS: Diagnostic criteria were established on the basis of previous experience with 60 patients who had renal colic and had undergone radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and urinary bladder (KUB) and diuretic Tc-MAG3 scintirenography and were followed up to correlate scintigraphic findings with clinical outcome. Subsequently, 80 patients with renal colic underwent scintigraphy within 12 h of presentation in the emergency room, after abdominal helical CT showed findings positive for calculus and suggestive of obstruction. After therapeutic oral or intravenous hydration and analgesics, diuretic dynamic renal scintigraphy (flow, function, delayed imaging) was performed after intravenous injections of 10 mCi (370 MBq) 99mTc-MAG3 and 40 mg furosemide (at zero time, or F0). Results were available soon after completion of the study and were considered in patient management. Four characteristic patterns of scintirenography, essential in patient stratification and treatment, had been standardized and were used for interpretation of the studies: the unobstructed kidney; the partially obstructed kidney, proximally or distally obstructed, with mild to severe obstruction and impairment of function; the totally obstructed kidney, with arrested renal function; and the unobstructed but dysfunctioning kidney after decompression, or stunned kidney. RESULTS: Among the 80 patients with positive helical CT findings, 56.5% were found to have obstruction by scintigraphy (32.5% partially, 24% completely); the remaining 43.5% did not have obstruction (21% without an indication of recent obstruction and 22.5% with stunned kidneys after spontaneous decompression). Occasionally, findings of preexistent urine extravasation or infection were present. Patients who, by scintigraphy, never had obstruction or had experienced spontaneous decompression did not require admission or emergency intervention; those with complete or severe obstruction required admission and decompression for relief of pain or restoration of function, whereas those with mild obstruction were treated variably with forced fluids, analgesics, or, less frequently, elective surgery. Outcome information from clinical examination, imaging, and interventional findings indicated that this stratification was successful. The test caused no side effects. CONCLUSION: For renal colic, clinical selection, KUB radiography, and even positive helical CT findings were all found to have a low positive predictive value for obstruction (in this study, 35%, 32%, and 56% respectively). Anatomic studies, including helical CT, should be followed by diuretic MAG3-F0 scintirenography to diagnose and quantify or exclude obstruction, detect spontaneous decompression, and appropriately stratify patients for emergency intervention, observation and medical therapy, or further work-up and discharge with referral to the clinic.

Sperm motility from the vas deferens of spinal cord injured men is higher than from the ejaculate.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that the seminal plasma of spinal cord injured men contributes to their distinctive semen profile of normal sperm concentration but low sperm motility and viability. This finding indicates that sperm in these men may be normal before exposure to the seminal and prostatic fluids. To investigate this question we compared vas aspirated to ejaculated sperm in 12 men with spinal cord injury and 14 healthy, age matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ejaculate was collected by penile vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation in spinal cord injured men and by masturbation in controls. Sperm was aspirated via microsurgery from 1 hemisectioned vas deferens in spinal cord injured men and during routine elective vasectomy in controls. Ejaculated and aspirated specimens were compared. RESULTS: In men with spinal cord injury mean vas aspirated sperm motility and viability plus or minus standard error of mean were significantly higher than mean ejaculated sperm motility and viability (54.4% +/- 5.0% and 74.1% +/- 5.3% versus 14.1% +/- 2.6% and 26.1% +/- 4.9%, respectively). In controls mean vas aspirated sperm motility and viability were not significantly different from mean ejaculated sperm motility and viability (77.5% +/- 5.2% and 88.9% +/- 2.5% versus 74.3% +/- 5.2% and 85.0% +/- 3.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In spinal cord injured men sperm motility and viability were significantly higher before contact with seminal fluids. Although aspirated sperm from men with spinal cord injury generally had lower motility and viability than that of controls, implying that epididymal or testicular factors may also have a part, the greatest decrease was observed in the ejaculate. Further study of infertility in these men should focus on prostatic and seminal vesicle factors.

Anesthetic block of the dorsal penile nerve inhibits vibratory-induced ejaculation in men with spinal cord injuries.

OBJECTIVES: [corrected] We investigated which nerve pathways are necessary to achieve ejaculation using penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Eight men with SCI were selected based on the presence of a bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and consistent antegrade ejaculation with PVS. Level of injury was cervical (4), upper thoracic (4), and lower thoracic (1). Mean age was 30.4 years (range 22 to 38). Usual responses to PVS included autonomic dysreflexia (4), erection (4), and consistent somatic responses such as abdominal contractions (8). Local anesthesia of the dorsal penile nerves (penile block) was achieved using 1% plain lidocaine injection. Effective penile block was confirmed by loss of the BCR. Two PVS ejaculation trials were performed: one trial during the penile block and one trial when the penile block had worn off. In 4 subjects, the bladder contents were analyzed for retrograde ejaculation. RESULTS: With the penile block, ejaculation was inhibited in 100% of the subjects. None of the bladder washings demonstrated sperm, indicating absence of retrograde ejaculation. None of the subjects exhibited their usual erectile response, somatic responses, or signs of autonomic dysreflexia. After the penile block wore off, PVS induced ejaculation in all subjects. If subjects usually had erection, somatic responses, or signs of autonomic dysreflexia, these also returned. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ejaculatory response to PVS in SCI men requires the presence of intact dorsal penile nerves.

Brown-colored semen in men with spinal cord injury.

The interesting condition of brown-colored semen has often been observed during assisted ejaculation of men with spinal cord injury (SCI). This condition has not been reported in the literature, and its cause is unknown. To investigate this condition, the present study examined the incidence and quality of brown semen and its relationship to level of SCI, time since SCI, number of successive ejaculations, ejaculation frequency, and ejaculation method in a total of 664 semen specimens from 162 SCI men. In addition, a microscopic evaluation was performed on brown semen specimens from SCI men, not-brown specimens from SCI men, and normally colored specimens from normal men. The results showed that 27% of SCI subjects had brown semen on at least one ejaculation. There was no difference between men producing and men not producing brown semen in age, level of injury, or years postinjury. The duration of an ejaculation, number of successive ejaculations, and frequency of ejaculation were not associated with occurrence of brown semen. Sperm concentration and sperm motility were not significantly different in brown and not-brown specimens. Specimens from subjects who produced brown semen had similar pH but lower volume than specimens from subjects who did not produce brown semen. Brown semen had a thin consistency more often than not-brown semen. Brown specimens contained intact red blood cells (RBCs) and/or heme pigment more often than not-brown specimens; however, one half and one third of the specimens, respectively, contained neither RBCs nor heme pigment. The cause of brown semen is unknown but may relate to seminal-vesicle dysfunction.

Serum and semen prostate specific antigen concentrations are different in young spinal cord injured men compared to normal controls.

PURPOSE: Recent investigations have indicated that factors within the seminal plasma may contribute to the condition of low sperm motility in men with spinal cord injury. To determine whether the prostate gland functions normally in these men we chose prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a marker of prostatic function, and compared serum and semen concentrations in spinal cord injured and healthy noninjured men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 21 spinal cord injured men (mean age 33.3+/-1.2 years) and 22 noninjured normal men (mean age 30.3+/-1.5 years). Blood was obtained from subjects following at least 24 hours of abstinence from ejaculation and serum PSA was determined by modified enzyme immunoassay. Antegrade ejaculates from all subjects were frozen to -80 C, exactly 15 minutes after collection. Seminal plasma PSA was determined using Hybritech Tandem MP assay. RESULTS: Mean serum PSA concentration was 1.20+/-0.19 ng./ml. in spinal cord injured and 0.69+/-0.07 ng./ml. in noninjured men (p<0.02). Mean seminal plasma PSA concentration was 0.59+/-0.11 mg./ml. in spinal cord injured and 1.29+/-0.15 mg./ml. in noninjured men (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of elevated serum and decreased seminal plasma PSA concentrations indicate that prostatic secretory dysfunction is present in men with spinal cord injury.

Semen quality in spinal cord injured men: does it progressively decline postinjury?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if semen quality of men with spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoes a progressive decline as a function of years postinjury. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data. SETTING: University-based research center. SUBJECTS: Semen quality was examined in 638 specimens from 125 men with SCI. INTERVENTION: Penile vibratory stimulation, electroejaculation, and masturbation were used as semen retrieval methods. Routine semen analysis was performed to evaluate semen quality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sperm concentration, total sperm count, and percent sperm motility were examined at 2-year intervals from men whose injuries had occurred 6 weeks to 26 years earlier. RESULTS: No difference in any semen parameter was found as a function of time postinjury. CONCLUSIONS: Semen quality in men with SCI does not progressively decline after the SCI. Men with SCI who are considering biologic fatherhood should be advised that the number of years after injury need not be a determinant in deciding when to start a family.

An analysis of 653 trials of penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: We evaluated ejaculatory response and semen quality in 653 trials of penile vibratory stimulation in 211 men with spinal cord injury, and compared results with low versus high amplitude vibratory stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low and/or high amplitude penile vibratory stimulation was performed 1 to 27 times in each patient, and antegrade and retrograde specimens of those who ejaculated were analyzed. RESULTS: Significantly more patients ejaculated using high (54.5%) versus low (39.9%) amplitude stimulation. Using either amplitude the ejaculatory success rate was highest in men with injuries at C3 to C7, followed by T1 to T5, T6 to T10 and T11 to L3. While high amplitude stimulation increased the ejaculatory success rate in each group, the highest rate occurred in men with injuries at C3 to C7 (65.6%). Ejaculation was reliable, since most men who ejaculated did so during 100% of the trials and within 2 minutes of stimulation onset. Symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia were safely managed with nifedipine. All patients who ejaculated produced antegrade specimens. With the exception of ejaculate volume, which was significantly higher with high versus low amplitude stimulation, semen parameters were similar using both vibrator amplitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Ejaculatory success is better while semen quality is similar using high versus low amplitude penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. This method may be considered first line treatment for anejaculation in men with spinal cord injury due to its safety, relative effectiveness, and relatively low investment of time and money.

Predictors of necrospermia in men with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: We identify predictors of the lowest yield of dead sperm in ejaculates of men with spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The percentages of dead immotile sperm and dead total sperm were compared in 141 spinal cord injured and 52 normal men. Predictors of necrospermia investigated in spinal cord injured men included specimen collection by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation, residence of sperm in antegrade versus retrograde specimens and level of injury. RESULTS: Spinal cord injured subjects had a significantly higher percentage of dead sperm in the immotile fraction and total specimen than control subjects. The percentage of dead sperm was lower in antegrade versus retrograde specimens and in specimens produced by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation. There was no difference in the percentage of dead sperm by level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Of the parameters evaluated only method and type of specimen collection were predictive of the degree of necrospermia in men with spinal cord injury. Level of injury was not predictive. The ratio of dead-to-live immotile sperm in spinal cord injured men was double that in normal men, indicating a pathological mechanism for sperm cell death.