Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC).

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The management of aortic graft infection (AGI) is highly complex and in the absence of a universally accepted case definition and evidence-based guidelines, clinical approaches and outcomes vary widely. The objective was to define precise criteria for diagnosing AGI. METHODS: A process of expert review and consensus, involving formal collaboration between vascular surgeons, infection specialists, and radiologists from several English National Health Service hospital Trusts with large vascular services (Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration [MAGIC]), produced the definition. RESULTS: Diagnostic criteria from three categories were classified as major or minor. It is proposed that AGI should be suspected if a single major criterion or two or more minor criteria from different categories are present. AGI is diagnosed if there is one major plus any criterion (major or minor) from another category. (i) Clinical/surgical major criteria comprise intraoperative identification of pus around a graft and situations where direct communication between the prosthesis and a nonsterile site exists, including fistulae, exposed grafts in open wounds, and deployment of an endovascular stent-graft into an infected field (e.g., mycotic aneurysm); minor criteria are localized AGI features or fever ≥38°C, where AGI is the most likely cause. (ii) Radiological major criteria comprise increasing perigraft gas volume on serial computed tomography (CT) imaging or perigraft gas or fluid (≥7 weeks and ≥3 months, respectively) postimplantation; minor criteria include other CT features or evidence from alternative imaging techniques. (iii) Laboratory major criteria comprise isolation of microorganisms from percutaneous aspirates of perigraft fluid, explanted grafts, and other intraoperative specimens; minor criteria are positive blood cultures or elevated inflammatory indices with no alternative source. CONCLUSION: This AGI definition potentially offers a practical and consistent diagnostic standard, essential for comparing clinical management strategies, trial design, and developing evidence-based guidelines. It requires validation that is planned in a multicenter, clinical service database supported by the Vascular Society of Great Britain & Ireland.

18F-FDG PET-CT uptake is a feature of both normal diameter and aneurysmal aortic wall and is not related to aneurysm size.

PURPOSE: Aortic metabolic activity is suggested to correlate with presence and progression of aneurysmal disease, but has been inadequately studied. This study investigates the 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake in a population of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), compared to a matched non-aneurysmal control group. METHODS: The Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET/CT) database was searched for infra-renal AAA. Exclusion criteria were prior repair, vasculitis, and saccular/mycotic thoracic or thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. Matching of 159 non-aneurysmal (<3 cm diameter) controls from the same population was assessed. Infra-renal aortic wall FDG uptake was assessed using visual analysis; maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target to background mediastinal blood pool ratio (TBR) were documented. Predictors of FDG uptake (age, sex, aortic diameter, hypertension, statin use, and diabetes) were assessed using univariate analysis. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to referring clinicians. RESULTS: Aneurysms (n = 151) and controls (n = 159) were matched (p > 0.05) for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking status, statin use, and indication for PET/CT. Median aneurysm diameter was 5.0 cm (range 3.2-10.4). On visual analysis there was no significant difference in the overall numbers with increased visual uptake 24% (36/151) in the aneurysm group vs. 19% (30/159) in the controls, p = ns. SUVmax was slightly lower in the aneurysm group vs. controls (mean (2 SD) 1.75(0.79) vs. 1.84(0.58), p = 0.02). However there was no difference in TBR between the AAA group and controls (mean (2 SD) 1.03 (0.46) vs. 1.05(0.31), p = 0.36). During a median 18 (interquartile range 8-35) months' follow-up 20 were repaired and four were confirmed ruptured. CONCLUSIONS: The level of metabolic activity as assessed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in infra-renal AAA does not correlate with aortic size and does not differ between aneurysms and matched controls.

A 14-year experience with aortic endograft infection: management and results.

OBJECTIVES: The management of thoracic and abdominal aortic endograft infection is complex and associated with high mortality. Cases are rare: a recent systematic review identified 117 reported cases; the largest reported series comprises 12 infected endografts. METHODS: We report 22 consecutive patients with infected abdominal or thoracic aortic endovascular devices implanted from 1998 to 2012. Management included extension with new devices, aneurysm sac drainage of pus/irrigation with antibiotics, endograft explantation, and axillo-(bi)femoral reconstruction. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (16 men) were identified. Median age was 71 years (range, 43-88 years). Index devices were infra-renal endovascular repair (n = 13), and thoracic endovascular repair (n = 9) all for aneurysmal or pseudoaneurysmal disease. Seven (32%) had prior aortic surgery. Follow-up was complete in all cases; in survivors follow-up was a median of 29 (range, 12-45) months. The mortality from explantation of ten infra-renal devices was 1/10 (10%) on-table and a further 2/10 (20%) within 30 days. Device retention led to disease progression and death in all patients with infected endografts. Sac drainage/irrigation provided only temporary control of sepsis. Device extension can treat rupture, but additional devices became infected. CONCLUSION: Abdominal endograft explantation is high risk but may be curative. Appropriate selection of patients for infected endograft explantation remains a major challenge.

Predictors of outcome after endovascular repair for chronic type B dissection.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the durability of endovascular repair (TEVAR) in chronic type B dissection (CD) and identify factors predictive of outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. MATERIALS: Patients undergoing TEVAR for CD at a tertiary referral centre 2000-2010. METHODS: Analysis of pre-operative characteristics, operative outcome, false lumen thrombosis, aortic diameter and survival. RESULTS: 58 consecutive patients were included (49 elective, 9 urgent, mean age 66 years). Mean aortic diameter was 6.4 cm (Standard deviation SD 1.3 cm). Three patients died perioperatively (5%, 1 urgent, 2 elective). Complications included retrograde type A dissection (n = 3), paraplegia (1), and transient ischaemic attack (1). Estimated survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 89% (1-year) and 64% (3-years). Forty-seven patients had mid-term imaging follow-up at mean 38 months. Reintervention rate was 15% at 1-year and 29% at 3-years. Aortic diameter decreased in 24, was stable in 15 and increased in 8. Mid-term survival was higher in patients with aortic remodelling (reduction of aortic diameter >0.5 cm; 3-year 89%) than without (54%; Log Rank p = 0.005). Remodelling occurred with extensive false lumen thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory mid-term outcome after TEVAR for CD remains a challenge. Survival is associated with aortic remodelling, which is related to persistence of flow in the false lumen.

Successful endovascular repair of acute type B aortic dissection in undiagnosed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV.

A 61-year-old man presented with an acute type B aortic dissection for which a stent-graft was introduced. He remains complication-free 4 years onwards and has since been diagnosed with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV (EDS IV). His particular mutation is predicted to result in lesser levels of normal collagen and may explain his favourable outcome from endovascular intervention. Understanding the genotype-phenotype correlation may influence the choice of therapy offered to patients with EDS IV.

Ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a renal transplant patient with Alport's syndrome.

Alport's syndrome is a rare genetic disorder of type IV basement membrane collagen synthesis that typically presents with nephropathy, deafness, and ocular abnormalities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the world's literature of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a young patient with Alport's syndrome and a renal transplant. Hypotheses on an association between collagen disease in Alport's syndrome and aortic aneurysms are discussed.