Somatic mutations in early onset luminal breast cancer.

Breast cancer arising in very young patients may be biologically distinct; however, these tumors have been less well studied. We characterized a group of very young patients (≤ 35 years) for BRCA germline mutation and for somatic mutations in luminal (HER2 negative) breast cancer. Thirteen of 79 unselected very young patients were BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers. Of the non-BRCA tumors, eight with luminal subtype (HER2 negative) were submitted for whole exome sequencing and integrated with 29 luminal samples from the COSMIC database or previous literature for analysis. We identified C to T single nucleotide variants (SNVs) as the most common base-change. A median of six candidate driver genes was mutated by SNVs in each sample and the most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA, GATA3, TP53 and MAP2K4. Potential cancer drivers affected in the present non-BRCA tumors include GRHL2, PIK3AP1, CACNA1E, SEMA6D, SMURF2, RSBN1 and MTHFD2. Sixteen out of 37 luminal tumors (43%) harbored SNVs in DNA repair genes, such as ATR, BAP1, ERCC6, FANCD2, FANCL, MLH1, MUTYH, PALB2, POLD1, POLE, RAD9A, RAD51 and TP53, and 54% presented pathogenic mutations (frameshift or nonsense) in at least one gene involved in gene transcription. The differential biology of luminal early-age onset breast cancer needs a deeper genomic investigation.

Transcriptional profile of fibroblasts obtained from the primary site, lymph node and bone marrow of breast cancer patients.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) influence tumor development at primary as well as in metastatic sites, but there have been no direct comparisons of the transcriptional profiles of stromal cells from different tumor sites. In this study, we used customized cDNA microarrays to compare the gene expression profile of stromal cells from primary tumor (CAF, n = 4), lymph node metastasis (N+, n = 3) and bone marrow (BM, n = 4) obtained from breast cancer patients. Biological validation was done in another 16 samples by RT-qPCR. Differences between CAF vs N+, CAF vs BM and N+ vs BM were represented by 20, 235 and 245 genes, respectively (SAM test, FDR < 0.01). Functional analysis revealed that genes related to development and morphogenesis were overrepresented. In a biological validation set, NOTCH2 was confirmed to be more expressed in N+ (vs CAF) and ADCY2, HECTD1, HNMT, LOX, MACF1, SLC1A3 and USP16 more expressed in BM (vs CAF). Only small differences were observed in the transcriptional profiles of fibroblasts from the primary tumor and lymph node of breast cancer patients, whereas greater differences were observed between bone marrow stromal cells and the other two sites. These differences may reflect the activities of distinct differentiation programs.

Calcitriol supplementation effects on Ki67 expression and transcriptional profile of breast cancer specimens from post-menopausal patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: High concentration of 1,25(OH)2D3 (50-100 nM), which cause hypercalcemia in vivo, induce the hormone transcriptional targets and exert antiproliferative effects in cultured breast cancer lineages, however, no studies investigated whether these effects might be reproduced in tumor specimens in vivo. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of calcitriol supplementation on the proliferative index (Ki67 expression) and gene expression profile of post-menopausal breast cancer samples. METHODS & RESULTS: Tumor samples were collected from 33 patients, most of whom (87.5%) presenting 25(OH)D3 insufficiency, before and after a short term calcitriol supplementation (0.50 µg/day PO, for 30 days). Tumor dimension remained stable in ultrasound evaluations. A slight reduction in Ki67 immunoexpression was detected, however in only 10/32 post-calcitriol samples an expressively low proliferative index [Ln (%Ki67+) < 1] was achieved. Gene expression from 15 matched pre/post-supplementation samples was analyzed by microarray (U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip, Affymetrix) and 15 genes were over-expressed in post-supplementation tumors, including FOS and EGR1, which were previously shown to be regulated by vitamin D. However, these results were not confirmed in another four breast cancer samples. CONCLUSIONS: Calcitriol supplementation is neither sufficient to expressively elicit an antiproliferative response nor to induce the hormone transcriptional signaling pathway in breast cancer specimens.

Transcriptional effects of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D(3) physiological and supra-physiological concentrations in breast cancer organotypic culture.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D transcriptional effects were linked to tumor growth control, however, the hormone targets were determined in cell cultures exposed to supra physiological concentrations of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) (50-100nM). Our aim was to evaluate the transcriptional effects of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) in a more physiological model of breast cancer, consisting of fresh tumor slices exposed to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) at concentrations that can be attained in vivo. METHODS: Tumor samples from post-menopausal breast cancer patients were sliced and cultured for 24 hours with or without 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) 0.5nM or 100nM. Gene expression was analyzed by microarray (SAM paired analysis, FDR≤0.1) or RT-qPCR (p≤0.05, Friedman/Wilcoxon test). Expression of candidate genes was then evaluated in mammary epithelial/breast cancer lineages and cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), exposed or not to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) 0.5nM, using RT-qPCR, western blot or immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) 0.5nM or 100nM effects were evaluated in five tumor samples by microarray and seven and 136 genes, respectively, were up-regulated. There was an enrichment of genes containing transcription factor binding sites for the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in samples exposed to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) near physiological concentration. Genes up-modulated by both 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) concentrations were CYP24A1, DPP4, CA2, EFTUD1, TKTL1, KCNK3. Expression of candidate genes was subsequently evaluated in another 16 samples by RT-qPCR and up-regulation of CYP24A1, DPP4 and CA2 by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) was confirmed. To evaluate whether the transcripitonal targets of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) 0.5nM were restricted to the epithelial or stromal compartments, gene expression was examined in HB4A, C5.4, SKBR3, MDA-MB231, MCF-7 lineages and CAFs, using RT-qPCR. In epithelial cells, there was a clear induction of CYP24A1, CA2, CD14 and IL1RL1. In fibroblasts, in addition to CYP24A1 induction, there was a trend towards up-regulation of CA2, IL1RL1, and DPP4. A higher protein expression of CD14 in epithelial cells and CA2 and DPP4 in CAFs exposed to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) 0.5nM was detected. CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer specimens a short period of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) exposure at near physiological concentration modestly activates the hormone transcriptional pathway. Induction of CYP24A1, CA2, DPP4, IL1RL1 expression appears to reflect 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) effects in epithelial as well as stromal cells, however, induction of CD14 expression is likely restricted to the epithelial compartment.

Comprehensive analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutation and tumor characterization: a portrait of early-onset breast cancer in Brazil.

Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 genes have been identified as one of the most important disease-causing issues in young breast cancer patients worldwide. The specific defective biological processes that trigger germline mutation-associated and -negative tumors remain unclear. To delineate an initial portrait of Brazilian early-onset breast cancer, we performed an investigation combining both germline and tumor analysis. Germline screening of the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 (c.1100delC) and TP53 genes was performed in 54 unrelated patients <35 y; their tumors were investigated with respect to transcriptional and genomic profiles as well as hormonal receptors and HER2 expression/amplification. Germline mutations were detected in 12 out of 54 patients (22%) [7 in BRCA1 (13%), 4 in BRCA2 (7%) and one in TP53 (2%) gene]. A cancer familial history was present in 31.4% of the unrelated patients, from them 43.7% were carriers for germline mutation (37.5% in BRCA1 and in 6.2% in the BRCA2 genes). Fifty percent of the unrelated patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors carried BRCA1 mutations, percentage increasing to 83% in cases with familial history of cancer. Over-representation of DNA damage-, cellular and cell cycle-related processes was detected in the up-regulated genes of BRCA1/2-associated tumors, whereas cell and embryo development-related processes were over-represented in the up-regulated genes of BRCA1/2-negative tumors, suggesting distinct mechanisms driving the tumorigenesis. An initial portrait of the early-onset breast cancer patients in Brazil was generated pointing out that hormone receptor-negative tumors and positive familial history are two major risk factors for detection of a BRCA1 germline mutation. Additionally, the data revealed molecular factors that potentially trigger the tumor development in young patients.

Influence of the interaction between nodal fibroblast and breast cancer cells on gene expression.

Our aim was to evaluate the interaction between breast cancer cells and nodal fibroblasts, by means of their gene expression profile. Fibroblast primary cultures were established from negative and positive lymph nodes from breast cancer patients and a similar gene expression pattern was identified, following cell culture. Fibroblasts and breast cancer cells (MDA-MB231, MDA-MB435, and MCF7) were cultured alone or co-cultured separated by a porous membrane (which allows passage of soluble factors) for comparison. Each breast cancer lineage exerted a particular effect on fibroblasts viability and transcriptional profile. However, fibroblasts from positive and negative nodes had a parallel transcriptional behavior when co-cultured with a specific breast cancer cell line. The effects of nodal fibroblasts on breast cancer cells were also investigated. MDA MB-231 cells viability and migration were enhanced by the presence of fibroblasts and accordingly, MDA-MB435 and MCF7 cells viability followed a similar pattern. MDA-MB231 gene expression profile, as evaluated by cDNA microarray, was influenced by the fibroblasts presence, and HNMT, COMT, FN3K, and SOD2 were confirmed downregulated in MDA-MB231 co-cultured cells with fibroblasts from both negative and positive nodes, in a new series of RT-PCR assays. In summary, transcriptional changes induced in breast cancer cells by fibroblasts from positive as well as negative nodes are very much alike in a specific lineage. However, fibroblasts effects are distinct in each one of the breast cancer lineages, suggesting that the inter-relationships between stromal and malignant cells are dependent on the intrinsic subtype of the tumor.

Influência da vitamina D na proliferação e na expressão de genes alvo em câncer de mama de pacientes pós-menopausadas / Vitamin D influence on proliferation and expression of target genes in post-menopausal breast câncer patients

Pacientes com câncer de mama apresentam menores níveis de 1,25(OH)2D3 ou 25(OH)D3 em relação às mulheres sem a doença. Embora linhagens de câncer de mama apresentem inibição do crescimento em concentrações supra-fisiológicas de 1,25(OH)2D3, forma ativa da vitamina D, ainda não se demonstrou se o hormônio exerce efeito antiproliferativo, em concentrações fisiológicas, em tumores de seres humanos. A suplementação de calcitriol pode ser indica a mulheres pós-menopausadas para prevenir a perda óssea. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar em pacientes com câncer de mama, pós menopausadas, a dimensão do tumor, taxa de proliferação (expressão de Ki67), concentração sérica de 1,25(OH)2D3 e 25(OH)D3, expressão gênica tumoral do receptor de vitamina D (VDR) e alguns genes alvos como, CYP24A1, CYP27B1, IGFBP3, PHB, TGFB2, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CYP27B1, MYC, CAMP, TXNRD2, antes a após um mês de suplementação oral de calcitriol. Foram estudadas 24 pacientes com doença operável, idade mediana de 57 anos. As primeiras 10 pacientes e as 14 seguintes receberam 0,25 e 0,50g/dia de calcitriol, respectivamente, por um período mediano de 31 dias. Três quartos das pacientes apresentavam nível sérico de insuficiência de 25(OH)D3 ou insuficiência relativa (<30ng/ml) e após a suplementação, nenhuma paciente apresentou elevação dos níveis séricos de 1,25(OH)2D3 e 25(OH)D3. Embora a dimensão tumoral, mensurada por ultrasonografia, não apresentasse variação, a imuno-expressão de Ki67 sofreu um redução relativa mediana de 40%. A expressão relativa de VDR, CYP24A1, CYP27B1, IGFBP3, PHB, TGFB2, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CYP27B1, MYC, CAMP, TXNRD2 não se alterou com a suplementação. Nossos dados indicam que tumores de mama expressam VDR, e que após suplementação oral de calcitriol, ocorre uma redução da proliferação. Este efeito merece ser elucidado, desde que genes alvo clássicos da 1,25(OH)2D3 não parecem ser mediadores do efeito anti-proliferativo, em amostras de câncer de mama de pacientes pós menopausadas.

Breast cancer patients present lower 1,25(OH)2D3 or 25(OH)D3 serum levels than unaffected women. Although breast cancer cell lines are growth inhibited by vitamin D supra-physiological concentrations, there is much uncertainty about the anti-proliferative effect of physiological concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3, the active form of vitamin D, in breast cancer specimens in vivo. Vitamin D supplementation to post-menopausal women may be indicated to reduce bone loss. Our aim was to evaluate tumor dimension, proliferation rate (Ki67 expression), 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 serum concentration, and tumor expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR), and of some target genes as CYP24A1, CYP27B1, IGFBP3, PHB, TGFB2, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CYP27B1, MYC, CAMP, TXNRD2, before and after a one month calcitriol supplementation to post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Twenty four patients with operable disease, median age 57 years, were enrolled. The first tem patients were supplemented with calcitriol 0.25g/d and the next 14 patients, with 0.50g/d, for a median period of 31 days. Three fourths of the patients presented 25(OH)D3 insufficiency or relative insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) and after calcitriol supplementation, none of them presented an elevation of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 25(OH)D3 serum concentration. Although tumor dimension, evaluated by ultrasonography, did not vary, a median relative reduction of 40% in Ki67 immuno-expression, was observed. No differences in VDR, CYP24A1, CYP27B1, IGFBP3, PHB, TGFB2, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CYP27B1, MYC, CAMP, TXNRD2 mRNA relative expression were detected between pre and post-supplementation samples. No differences in VDR, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 tumor relative expression were detected following supplementation. Our data indicate that VDR expression is detected in breast cancer samples and that growth inhibition takes place after calcitriol oral supplementation. This anti-proliferative effect deserves further investigation, as classical target genes do not...

25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 serum concentration and breast tissue expression of 1alpha-hydroxylase, 24-hydroxylase and Vitamin D receptor in women with and without breast cancer.

1,25(OH)2D3 is an antiproliferative agent that may inhibit proliferation of breast cancer (BC) cells in vitro and BC development in animals. Epidemiological studies have shown a high incidence of BC in people less exposed to solar rays. To unravel the role of Vitamin D3 in BC patients, we have investigated serum levels of 25(OH)D3 and its active form 1,25(OH)2D3 as well as tissue expression of 1alpha-hydroxylase, 24-hydroxylase, and Vitamin D-receptor (VDR), determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR, in 88 Brazilian BC patients and 35 women without cancer (submitted to mammoplasties or resection of benign lesions). Median age of women with and without cancer was 51 and 46 years, respectively, and the majority of BC patients were classified as clinical stage II (67%). Although no differences in 25(OH)D3 serum concentration were found, 1,25(OH)2D3 (40+/-21 pg/ml) levels in BC patients were lower than in women without cancer (53+/-23). Our results indicate that 24-hydroxylase, VDR and 1alpha-hydroxylase mRNA tissue expression is similar in both groups and no correlation between 24-hydroxylase, 1alpha-hydroxylase, and VDR expression in breast tumors was found. A low 1,25(OH)2D3 serum concentration seems to be associated to breast cancer, however, the mechanism involved in this regulation is still unclear.

The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been described for the treatment of breast hypertrophy and ptosis. Unfortunately, recurrent ptosis after mammaplasty can occur regardless of the technique used. To avoid this problem, different kinds of supporting devices have been described with variable rates of success. However, the true implications of incorporating prosthetic materials into breast surgery have never been clarified. Therefore, surgeons have traditionally been reluctant to apply any kind of prosthetic material to the breast, fearing inflammation, an unfavorable aesthetic outcome, palpable or visible deformities, and interference with the mammographic evaluation of breast cancer. This study analyzed the aesthetic, clinical, and mammographic implications of using mesh as a supportive device in periareolar breast surgery. METHODS: For this study, 18 patients (mean age, 42 years) with breast hypertrophy, ptosis, or both were managed with the double-skin periareolar mammaplasty technique, with placement of mixed (60% Polyglactine and 40% polyester) mesh. Clinical assessment was performed by three breast surgeons actively working on cancer surveillance who knew that the patients had experienced mesh application. After a mean follow-up period of 30 months, a standard mammogram was performed for each patient and analyzed by both the surgeons and an expert radiologist. The evaluated factors were hyperemia, calcifications, contour irregularities, capsular contraction, thickening or widening of the scar with extrusion of the mesh, and any palpable or hardened areas. RESULTS: According to the authors' clinical observations, there were no mesh-related abnormalities in the breast; the mesh was not palpable after the operation; and there was no recurrent ptosis. In terms of mammographic imaging, the mesh was visible as a very fine line in the periphery of the breast's parenchyma (measuring 0.2 mm on the lateral views) in three patients (17%). The mesh did not interfere with the visualization and analysis of the breast's parenchyma. In seven patients (39%), benign localized microcalcifications were detected in the breast and no further investigation was performed. In two patients (11%), grouped calcifications were detected and biopsied, with histopathologic analysis demonstrating epithelial hyperplasia with atypia. In two patients (11%), nodules smaller than 1 cm were detected and biopsied, with histopathologic analysis demonstrating a fibroadenoma in one patient and an invasive ductal carcinoma in the other. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mesh support in breast surgery can enhance the aesthetic results without inducing visible or palpable deformities or mammographic abnormalities. In terms of surveillance mammograms, the presence of the mesh did not interfere with the diagnosis and treatment of minute lesions such as calcifications and small nodules.