Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 2020 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32380030

ABSTRACT

Contaminated hands may contribute to the transmission of pathogens. In the prevention of healthcare-associated infections the effect of disinfection methods should ideally be possible to measure in a simple way. Microbial cultivation is the reference standard, but it is a rather complicated and time-consuming procedure, and the use of swabs for measuring adenosine triphosphate (ATP) has become a much-used proxy measurement (bioluminescence). We evaluated the effect of three hand-disinfection methods on eradication of Escherichia coli from artificially contaminated hands, using cultivation and ATP measurements in parallel. ATP measurement was found to be an unsuitable method as this reflects the total amount of cellular material left on the hands, not only the viable bacteria.

2.
J Hosp Infect ; 105(2): 213-215, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229145

ABSTRACT

The effect of alcohol hand rub was tested in eradicating Escherichia coli, and compared with hand wash using ozonized tap water or soap and water. Alcohol eradicated all bacteria in 10 out of 35 participants, but with an average (SD) of 2330 (4227) cfu/mL left after disinfection, whereas ozonized water removed all bacteria in 10 out of 55 participants, with an average of only 538 (801) cfu/mL left (P = 0.045). Soap washing was the most effective with total removal of bacteria in six out of 20 participants, with an average of 98 (139) cfu/mL (P = 0.048 and 0.018 versus ozonized water and alcohol, respectively).


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand Sanitizers/pharmacology , Soaps/pharmacology , Water/pharmacology , 2-Propanol/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Colony Count, Microbial , Disinfectants/classification , Ethanol/pharmacology , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Ozone/pharmacology , Young Adult
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(4): 419-424, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30731184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene plays a vital role in the prevention of transmission of micro-organisms. Ozone (O3) is a highly reactive gas with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial effects on bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. It can easily be produced locally in small generators, and dissolved in tap water, and quickly transmits into ordinary O2 in the surrounding air. AIM: To compare ozonized tap water and alcohol rub in decontamination of bacterially contaminated hands. METHODS: A cross-over study among 30 nursing students. Hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), then sanitized with ozonized tap water (0.8 or 4 ppm) or 3 mL standard alcohol-based rub (Antibac 85%). The transient microbes from fingers were cultivated and colony-forming units (cfu)/mL were counted. The test procedure was modified from European Standard EN 1500:2013. FINDINGS: All contaminated hands before disinfection showed cfu >30,000/mL. The mean (SD) bacterial counts in (cfu/mL) on both hands combined were 1017 (1391) after using ozonized water, and 2337 (4664) after alcohol hand disinfection. The median (range) values were 500 (0-6700) and 250 (0-16,000) respectively (non-significant difference). Twenty per cent of participants reported adverse skin effects (burning/dryness) from alcohol disinfection compared with no adverse sensations with ozone. CONCLUSION: Ozonized tap water is an effective decontaminant of E. coli, and it could be an alternative to traditional alcohol-fluid hand disinfectants both in healthcare institutions and public places. Ozonized water may be especially valuable for individuals with skin problems.


Subject(s)
Alcohols/administration & dosage , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand/microbiology , Ozone/administration & dosage , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross-Over Studies , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Students, Nursing , Water/administration & dosage , Young Adult
4.
Ophthalmologica ; 217(6): 381-6, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14573969

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess whether or not visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are abnormal in konzo, a para/tetraparesis of sudden onset, and to correlate the findings to the clinical picture of the disorder. METHODS: VEPs were recorded in 23 patients (9 men and 14 women, mean age: 23 +/- 10 years) suffering from konzo, and 38 healthy subjects (20 men and 18 women, mean age: 27 +/- 15 years). The mean P100 latencies and peak-to-peak N75-P100 amplitudes of each eye were measured and compared in the two groups. The mean interocular P100 latency and amplitude differences were calculated and also compared. RESULTS: VEPs were abnormal in 11/23 patients (48%) consisting of P100 prolongation (7 subjects), absence of P100 wave (2 subjects) or an atypical waveform (2 subjects). The mean P100 latency value of the konzo group was significantly increased as compared with the mean (+ 2.5 SD) of the reference values from healthy subjects (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant decrease of amplitude in konzo patients compared to normal subjects (p < 0.05) with, however, only 2 patients outside the 95% confidence limits. Six patients (27%) had abnormal VEPs despite normal visual acuity. These abnormalities were symmetric and a relation could be found between neither the duration nor the severity of the disease and the VEP perturbation. CONCLUSION: The main features of these abnormalities are delayed P100 latency and decreased amplitude. These findings indicate involvement of visual pathways and seem to suggest the presence of axonal loss in the prechiasmal visual pathways in konzo. This study provides evidence that the neurodamage in konzo extends to the visual pathways.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Motor Neuron Disease/physiopathology , Paraparesis, Spastic/physiopathology , Visual Pathways/physiopathology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Congo , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Visual Acuity
5.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 121(11): 1391-4, 2001 Apr 30.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11419113

ABSTRACT

Doctors are at risk of having to take blame even if they have acted according to good medical practice. One reason for this is to be found in two mechanisms, shift of liability and escalation of liability--irrational mechanisms by which doctors are affected after a medical mishap. A mishap is difficult to accept and those who suffer because of it want to place responsibility somewhere. A shift of liability occurs when responsibility is displaced from the patient or the system to the doctor. Escalation takes place when a mishap is considered much worse after the fact than in the risk evaluation ex ante. The author points at the problems these mechanisms cause for patients, doctors, and society and provides some suggestions as to how doctors may handle such situations in a fruitful manner.


Subject(s)
Liability, Legal , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician's Role , Humans , Norway , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...