Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

The objective of this guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of SLE that builds upon the existing treatment guideline for adults living with SLE published in 2017. This will incorporate advances in the assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of SLE. General approaches to management as well as organ-specific treatment, including lupus nephritis and cutaneous lupus, will be covered. This will be the first guideline in SLE using a whole life course approach from childhood through adolescence and adulthood. The guideline will be developed with people with SLE as an important target audience in addition to healthcare professionals. It will include guidance related to emerging approved therapies and account for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Health Service England clinical commissioning policies and national guidance relevant to SLE. The guideline will be developed using the methods and rigorous processes outlined in 'Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol' by the British Society for Rheumatology.

Current views on lupus in children.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This manuscript provides an update on clinical and pathophysiological features of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosis (jSLE), challenges applying adult-derived classification criteria, and recent advances in treatment and care. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant scientific advances have improved the understanding of genetic factors (both genetic causes and risk alleles) and associated phenotypic features. Panels of urine/blood biomarker candidates aid in diagnosing jSLE, monitoring disease activity and predicting treatment response. Available classification criteria have been extensively assessed, with differences in clinical and immunological phenotypes of patients across age groups and ethnicities affecting their performance in jSLE. Therapeutic options remain limited and are based on protocols for adult-onset SLE patients. International efforts to inform development of a treat-to-target (T2T) approach for jSLE have yielded cohort-level evidence that target attainment reduces the risk of severe flare and new damage, and treatment compliance. SUMMARY: Recent studies have significantly improved our understanding of jSLE pathogenesis, highlighting important differences between jSLE and adult SLE, and providing the basis of biomarker development and target-directed individualized treatment and care. Future work focused on development of a T2T approach in jSLE is eagerly awaited.

Prospective epidemiological study of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in the UK and Republic of Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to define the incidence of JSLE in children <16 years of age in the UK and Republic of Ireland (ROI). The secondary objective was to describe presenting features, classification criteria, initial management and disease damage in newly presenting JSLE patients. METHODS: A prospective JSLE epidemiological study was undertaken between September 2017 and September 2019 with support of the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit and other professional groups involved in diagnosis and management of JSLE patients. Treating consultants reported all cases of JSLE seen. A follow-up study at 1 year examined management and progression of disease and treatment. RESULTS: There were 124 incident cases included in the final analysis. Incidence was estimated using ACR-1997 classification criteria (0.36/100 000), SLICC-2012 classification criteria (0.41/100 000) and clinician expert opinion (0.46/100 000). A high disease burden was seen, with 71.0% of patients requiring ongoing systemic CS treatment at 1 year; 98.2% receiving immunomodulatory treatment; and 20.4% accruing damage in the year following diagnosis (predominantly neuropsychiatric-related), with substantial involvement from multiple speciality teams. CONCLUSIONS: The minimum UK and ROI incidence of JSLE is between 0.36 and 0.46/100 000, depending on the case definition used. Challenges in classification of patients with JSLE are highlighted, but overall this study supports the use of SLICC-2012 classification criteria. The high levels of disease damage and ongoing CS use 1 year after diagnosis is concerning, highlighting the need for further interventions to improve outcomes in JSLE.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment options.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) accounts for up to 20% of all SLE patients. Key differences between juvenile- and adult-onset (aSLE) disease include higher disease activity, earlier development of damage, and increased use of immunosuppressive treatment in jSLE suggesting (at least partial) infectivity secondary to variable pathomechanisms. While the exact pathophysiology of jSLE remains unclear, genetic factors, immune complex deposition, complement activation, hormonal factors and immune cell dysregulation are involved to variable extents, promising future patient stratification based on immune phenotypes. Though less effective and potentially toxic, jSLE patients are treated based upon evidence from studies in aSLE cohorts. Here, age-specific clinical features of jSLE, underlying pathomechanisms, treatment options and disease outcomes will be addressed. Future directions to improve the care of jSLE patients, including implementation of the Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) recommendations, biomarkers, treat to target and personalized medicine approaches are discussed.

Vasculitis in Juvenile-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) is a rare, heterogeneous multisystem autoimmune disease that can affect any organ, and present with diverse clinical and serological manifestations. Vasculitis can be a feature of JSLE. It more commonly presents as cutaneous vasculitis than visceral vasculitis, which can affect the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, lungs, gut, kidneys, heart, and large vessels. The incidence and prevalence of vasculitis in JSLE has not been well described to date. Symptoms of vasculitis can be non-specific and overlap with other features of JSLE, requiring careful consideration for the diagnosis to be achieved and promptly treated. Biopsies are often required to make a definitive diagnosis and differentiate JSLE related vasculitis from other manifestations of JSLE, vasculopathies, and JSLE related antiphospholipid syndrome. Visceral vasculitis can be life threatening, and its presence at the time of JSLE diagnosis is associated with permanent organ damage, which further highlights the importance of prompt recognition and treatment. This review will focus on the presentation, diagnosis, management and outcomes of vasculitis in JSLE, highlighting gaps in the current evidence base.

Multi-centre national audit of juvenile localised scleroderma: describing current UK practice in disease assessment and management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current United Kingdom practice in assessment and management of patients with juvenile localised scleroderma (JLS) compared to Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES) scleroderma working party recommendations. METHODS: Patients were included if they were diagnosed with JLS and were under the care of paediatric rheumatology between 04/2015-04/2016. Retrospective data was collected in eleven UK centres using a standardised proforma and collated centrally. RESULTS: 149 patients were included with a median age of 12.5 years. The outcome measures recommended by the PRES scleroderma working party were not utilised widely. The localised scleroderma cutaneous assessment tool was only used in 37.6% of patients. Screening for extracutaneous manifestations did not meet recommendations that patients with head involvement have regular screening for uveitis and baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain: only 38.5% of these patients were ever screened for uveitis; 71.2% had a MRI brain. Systemic treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics was widely used (96.0%). In keeping with the recommendations, 95.5% of patients were treated with methotrexate as first-line therapy. 82.6% received systemic corticosteroids and 34.2% of patients required two or more DMARDs/biologics, highlighting the significant treatment burden. Second-line treatment was mycophenolate mofetil in 89.5%. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in assessment and screening of patients with JLS but a consistent approach to systemic treatment within UK paediatric rheumatology. Improved awareness of PRES recommendations is required to ensure standardised care. As recommendations are based on low level evidence and consensus opinion, further studies are needed to better define outcome measures and treatment regimens for JLS.

Neutrophil activation signature in juvenile idiopathic arthritis indicates the presence of low-density granulocytes.

Objective: JIA is an autoimmune, inflammatory disease with involvement of innate and adaptive immune responses. However, the role of neutrophils in JIA pathogenesis remains unclear. This study aimed to identify and validate neutrophil gene expression signatures in JIA using public microarray datasets and new clinical samples. Methods: Three suitable datasets were analysed by significance analysis of microarray and Ingenuity. Neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from a new cohort of JIA patients and healthy paediatric controls (HCs). Gene expression was validated using quantitative PCR. Serum concentrations of proteins were measured using ELISA. Low-density granulocytes (LDGs) in JIA and HC PBMCs were quantified by flow cytometry using forward/side-scatter properties. Results: Ingenuity identified transcriptional regulation (false discovery rate < 0.05) by G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-8 along with expression of neutrophil granule protein genes including ELANE, MPO, MMP8 and MMP9 in datasets from JIA PBMCs. LDG counts were elevated in JIA compared with HCs (2.5% vs 1.4%; P = 0.007). Transcripts for MMP8 (P = 0.005), MPO (P = 0.0124) and Fcγ Receptor 1B (FCγR1B) (P = 0.0417) were significantly higher in JIA compared with HC neutrophils. MMP9 protein levels were lower in systemic JIA patient sera [355.95 ng/ml (s.d. 250.03)] compared with HCs [675.41 ng/ml (s.d. 181.17); P = 0.007], but levels of elastase, MPO and MMP8 were not significantly different. Conclusion: LDGs are elevated in JIA and contribute to the transcriptomic profile of JIA PBMCs. JIA neutrophils express higher levels of MMP8 and FCGR1B, which may be implicated in disease pathology through the release of proteases and reactive oxygen metabolites, causing systemic inflammation and damage to joints.

NIHR Clinical Research Networks: what they do and how they help paediatric research.

This review provides paediatricians with an update on the new structure of the National Institute for Health Research's (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN): Children and its role within the wider NIHR infrastructure. The network supports delivery of high-quality research within the NHS in England and supports researchers, through provision of staff and resources, with feasibility, site set-up, patient recruitment and study management. Since 2013, over 80% of commercial contract studies running within the UK sat within the UKCRN Portfolio. Of the diverse, increasing portfolio of studies supported by the network, many studies are interventional, with 33% being randomised controlled studies. Recruitment to studies supported by the network through the Children's Portfolio has consistently improved. Over 200 000 participants have been recruited to the Children's Portfolio studies to date, and there are currently approximately 500 studies open to recruitment. The CRN: Children has successfully involved patients and the public in all aspects of study design and delivery, including through the work of Generation R. Challenges remain in conducting paediatric research and the network is committed to supporting Children's research and further building on its achievements to date. Education and engagement of paediatricians within the network and research is important to further improving quality and delivery of paediatric research.