[The preliminary application of vonoprazan fumarate on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of vonoprazan fumarate on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). Methods: The clinical data of 89 patients from June 2020 to January 2022, including 45 males and 44 females, aged 18-77 (45.54±13.53) years old, were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were diagnosed as suspected LPRD according to reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). Patients of the Vonoprazan Fumarate group were prescribed Vonoprazan Fumarate orally (20 mg, qd) for 8 weeks.Patients of the Esomeprazole group were prescribed Esomeprazole orally (20 mg, bid) for 8 weeks. RSI and RFS of all the patients before and after treatment were compared. SPSS 18.0 was used for statistics analysis. Results: Before treatment, gender, age, RSI and RFS of the two groups had no obvious differences. After treatment, RSI and RFS in both groups were alleviated significantly. In the vonorazan fumarate group, the RSI before treatment was 12.62±7.18, and after treatment was 4.74±3.87(t=6.91, P<0.001), the RFS was 10.78±2.29 before treatment and 8.24±2.45 after treatment (t=7.06, P<0.001). While in the esomeprazole group, the RSI was 13.27±6.95 before treatment and 6.02±4.28 after treatment (t=7.50, P<0.001), the RFS was 10.59±3.14 before treatment and 8.14±3.30 after treatment (t=5.41, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the two groups (86.7% in the vonoprazan fumarate group and 77.3% in the esomeprazole group, χ2=1.443, P=0.486). Conclusion: Vonoprazan fumarate could effectively alleviate the symptoms and signs of LPRD patients. The effect of vonoprazan fumarate on LPRD is not inferior to Esomeprazole. It can be used as a supplement to PPI.

[Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a new symptom score of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

Objective: To produce the Chinese version of a new reflux symptom score (RSS) of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and to evaluate its reliability, validity and clinical value. Methods: This was a retrospective study which contained 42 healthy volunteers and 135 possible LPRD patients. RSI,RFS,oropharyngeal pH monitoring (Dx-pH monitoring) and RSS of each patient were performed. RSS was performed again after 1 week. Confirmed LPRD patients were treated with proton pump inhibitor for 8 week. And RSS was performed again after treatment. Reliability and validity of RSS were evaluated. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of RSS was 0.77, which indicated good internal reliability of the new score. The results of test-retest found all P values were less than 0.05, which supported good external reliability. Comparing RSS with laryngopharyngeal reflux test results, the diagnostic coincidence rate was 84.44% (114/135), and the positive predictive value was 85.71% (114/133), which showed good criterion validity. After 8 weeks treatment of PPI, RSS decreased significantly (pretreatment 84.79±42.50,posttreatment 20.11±22.82,t=-10.54, P<0.001), indicating good reactivity of RSS. The score of quality of life impact (Qol) in possible LPRD patients was obviously higher than that of healthy volunteers (t=7.15,P<0.001). All patients and volunteers believed that RSS was a good way to evaluate their symptoms. Conclusions: The new score RSS have good internal and external reliability, criterion validity and reactivity. RSS can be one of the important reference indexes to evaluate LPRD.

[Preliminary application of Dx-pH monitoring system in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

Objective: To summarize the application and significance of Dx-pH monitoring system in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Methods: Fifty-four patients who had symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in our department from February to December in 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients were evaluated with reflux symptoms index(RSI), flexible laryngoscope and reflux finding score(RFS), and larygopharygeal Dx-pH monitoring. Results: Among all 54 patients, there were 26 patients whose Ryan score were positive(48.2%). The positive Ryan score mainly emerged when the patients were upright(24/26, 92.3%). Among 22 patients whose symptoms could not alleviate well by 8 weeks proton pump inhibitors treatment, there were 13 patients(59.1%) with positive Ryan scores. The Ryan scores were not in good accordance with RSI and RFS(κ=-0.013). Conclusions: Although the results were not in good accordance with RSI/RFS, Dx-pH monitoring system could prove laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and help physicians to diagnose.