An efficient anoxic/aerobic/aerobic/anoxic process for domestic sewage treatment: From feasibility to application.

In this paper, the anoxic/aerobic/aerobic/anoxic (AOOA) process was proposed using fixed biofilms in a continuous plug-flow multi-chamber reactor, and no sludge reflux operation was performed during the 190 days of operation. The reactor volume ratio of 1.5:2:1.5:1 (A/O/O/A) with the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration of 2 mg L-1 in the aerobic zone was the optimal condition for reactor operation. According to the results obtained from the treatment of real domestic sewage, when the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 6 h, the effluent of the reactor could meet the discharge standard even in cold conditions (13°C). Specifically, the elemental-sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (ESAD) process contributed the most to the removal of total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) in the reactor. In addition, the use of vibration method was helpful in removing excess sludge from the biofilms of the reactor. Overall, the AOOA process is an efficient and convenient method for treating domestic sewage.

Denitrification Performance in Packed-Bed Reactors Using Novel Carbon-Sulfur-Based Composite Filters for Treatment of Synthetic Wastewater and Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation Effluent.

To avoid nitrate pollution in water bodies, two low-cost and abundant natural organic carbon sources were added to make up the solid-phase denitrification filters. This study compared four novel solid-phase carbon-sulfur-based composite filters, and their denitrification abilities were investigated in laboratory-scale bioreactors. The filter F4 (mixture of elemental sulfur powder, shell powder, and peanut hull powder with a mass ratio of 6:2.5:1.5) achieved the highest denitrification ability, with an optimal nitrate removal rate (NRR) of 723 ± 14.2 mg NO3 --N⋅L-1⋅d-1 when the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 1 h. The HRT considerably impacted effluent quality after coupling of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) and solid-phase-based mixotrophic denitrification process (SMDP). The concentration of suspended solids (SS) of the ANAMMOX effluent may affect the performance of the coupled system. Autotrophs and heterotrophs were abundant and co-existed in all reactors; over time, the abundance of heterotrophs decreased while that of autotrophs increased. Overall, the SMDP process showed good denitrification performance and reduced the sulfate productivity in effluent compared to the sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (SAD) process.

Denitrification performance of sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification and biomass­sulfur-based mixotrophic denitrification in solid-phase denitrifying reactors using novel composite filters.

Both the elemental sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (ESAD) and the biomass­sulfur-based mixotrophic (simultaneous autotrophic and heterotrophic) denitrification processes (BSMD) are efficient methods for removing nitrate from wastewater. However, a comparative analysis of the denitrification capacity of the BSMD and ESAD in the packed bed reactors is still lacking. In this paper, corncob powder was selected as the biomass source to prepare biomass­sulfur-based composite filter (BSCF) for the BSMD process. The denitrification performances of the three identical lab-scale bioreactors packed with varying elemental sulfur-based composite filters (ESCFs) were compared under varying loading conditions, and the optimal ESCF of the ESAD system was 2:1 by weight ratio of sulfur powder to shell powder. In pilot-scale experiments, the results showed that BSCF could decrease the sulfate productivity and gave better denitrification performance than the ESCF with the optimal nitrate removal rate (NRR) of 504 ± 12.3 mg NO3--N·L-1·d-1. In addition, the two-stage flushing strategy (for the removal of aged sludge) can effectively improve the denitrification capacity, while the denitrification will be inhibited when the influent dissolved oxygen concentration was higher than 4.5 mg L-1. Moreover, the heterotrophs and autotrophs were abundant in the reactors. Over time, the abundance of autotrophs increased while that of heterotrophs decreased. Overall, BSCF could be a promising and economic technology to improve the effluent quality.

Exploration and verification of the feasibility of the sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification integrated biomass-based heterotrophic denitrification systems for wastewater treatment: From feasibility to application.

The sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (SAD) and the solid organic carbon-based denitrification processes are both efficient techniques to remove nitrate from wastewater, and the hydrogen ions generated by the SAD process would be consumed in the heterotrophic denitrification process. Therefore, it is possible to improve the denitrification capacity when the solid organic carbon was added into a SAD reactor. In this study, corncob powder and sawdust powder were selected as solid organic carbon sources, and the sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification integrated biomass-based heterotrophic denitrification system was formed (SBD). The laboratory and field experiments showed that SBD could shorten the start-up period, decrease the sulfate productivity, and maintain a good denitrification performance when treated wastewater. According to the field experiment results, when the HRT was 1 h, the effluent total nitrogen (TN) concentration was always lower than 15 mg L-1. In addition, nitrite inhibition was observed when the concentration of nitrite in the reactors reached above 30 mg L-1. The mixture of elemental sulfur powder, shell powder, corncob powder, and sawdust powder with a mass ratio of 6:2:1:1 was the optimal filter for the SBD system, with an average nitrate reduction rate (NAR) of 420 mg NO3-N·L-1·d-1 obtained at the end of the study. During the whole operation, the major autotrophs in the SBD systems were Thermomonas, Ferritrophicum, and Thiobacillus, while the major heterotrophs were Saprospiraceae, Ferruginibacter, Dokdonella, and Simplicispira. Overall, the SBD system was a feasible and practically favorable way to remove nitrate from wastewater.