ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad de intervenciones basadas en telemedicina para mejorar resultados en salud en pacientes con multimorbilidad en atención primaria. DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática. Fuentes de datos: INAHTA, Guía Salud, NICE, Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed y EMBASE hasta abril de 2018. Selección de estudios: CRITERIOS DE INCLUSIÓN: pacientes (adultos con 2 o más enfermedades crónicas o índice de Charlson mayor de 3); intervención (programa de telemedicina desarrollada en atención primaria); comparador (práctica habitual); resultados (mortalidad, ingresos hospitalarios, consultas a urgencias, calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y satisfacción); diseño (guía de práctica clínica, revisión sistemática, metaanálisis, ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado o cuasiexperimental). Publicación en inglés o español. Se localizaron 236 referencias. Extracción de datos: Exclusión de duplicados; valoración de criterios de selección sobre título, resumen y texto completo; valoración crítica; extracción y análisis cualitativo. Dos revisores y un tercero para discrepancias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 5 artículos de 3 estudios, 2 ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados y en cuasiexperimental. No se observaron resultados significativos en la reducción de la mortalidad o mejora de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. La efectividad de la telemedicina sobre el número de ingresos hospitalarios o consultas a urgencias mostró resultados contradictorios. La satisfacción no fue medida en los estudios incluidos. CONCLUSIONES: El escaso número de estudios, la relativa heterogeneidad y limitaciones metodológicas no permiten confirmar la efectividad de las intervenciones basadas en telemedicina en pacientes con multimorbilidad en atención primaria, sobre la mejora de la mortalidad, el número de ingresos hospitalarios o consultas a urgencias y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, respecto a la práctica habitual
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions to improve health outcomes in patients with multiple morbidities in Primary Health Care. DESIGN: A systematic review. Data sources: INAHTA, Health Guidelines, NICE, Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed and EMBASE up to April 2018. Study selection: Inclusion criteria: patients (adults with 2 or more chronic diseases or a Charlson index greater than three); intervention (telemedicine intervention developed entirely in Primary Health Care); comparator (usual care); health outcomes (mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction); study design(clinical practice guideline, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomised controlled clinical trial),and quasi-experimental design). English and Spanish language publication. A total of236 references were located. Data extraction: Duplicated articles were removed. Titles, abstracts, and full text of references identified were assessed using the selection criteria; methodological quality assessment; data extraction, and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Five articles, corresponding to 3 studies, were included, with 2 randomised controlled clinical trials and one quasi-experimental design. No significant results were observed in reducing mortality or improving health-related quality of life. The effectiveness of telemedicine on the number of hospital admissions or emergency visits showed contradictory results. Satisfaction was not measured in the studies included. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively small number of studies, heterogeneity characteristics, and methodological limitations did not confirm the effectiveness of telemedicine intervention on the improvement of mortality, number of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and health-related quality of life, compared to usual care
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Telemedicine/methods , Multimorbidity , Primary Health Care/methods , Multiple Chronic Conditions/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Quality of Life , Patient Outcome AssessmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions to improve health outcomes in patients with multiple morbidities in Primary Health Care. DESIGN: A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: INAHTA, Health Guidelines, NICE, Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed and EMBASE up to April 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria: patients (adults with 2 or more chronic diseases or a Charlson index greater than three); intervention (telemedicine intervention developed entirely in Primary Health Care); comparator (usual care); health outcomes (mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction); study design(clinical practice guideline, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomised controlled clinical trial),and quasi-experimental design). English and Spanish language publication. A total of236 references were located. DATA EXTRACTION: Duplicated articles were removed. Titles, abstracts, and full text of references identified were assessed using the selection criteria; methodological quality assessment; data extraction, and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Five articles, corresponding to 3 studies, were included, with 2 randomised controlled clinical trials and one quasi-experimental design. No significant results were observed in reducing mortality or improving health-related quality of life. The effectiveness of telemedicine on the number of hospital admissions or emergency visits showed contradictory results. Satisfaction was not measured in the studies included. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively small number of studies, heterogeneity characteristics, and methodological limitations did not confirm the effectiveness of telemedicine intervention on the improvement of mortality, number of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and health-related quality of life, compared to usual care.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Telemedicine , Adult , Humans , Multimorbidity , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Primary Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Los programas de pago por desempeño para mejorar la calidad de la atención sanitaria se están extendiendo de forma progresiva, en particular para en Atención Primaria. Nuestro objetivo fue explorar la relación entre el grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de proceso (IPr) de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) en Atención Primaria y la vinculación a incentivos económicos. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo observacional, descriptivo y transversal. Emplazamiento: Seis centros de salud del Distrito Aljarafe, Sevilla, seleccionados de forma aleatoria y estratificada por tamaño poblacional. PARTICIPANTES: De un total de 3.647 sujetos incluidos en el Proceso Asistencial Integrado de DM2 durante el 2008, se incluyó a 366 pacientes, según cálculo de tamaño muestral, mediante muestreo aleatorio estratificado. Mediciones: IPr: exploración de fondo de ojo y pies, hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1c), perfil lipídico, microalbuminuria y electrocardiograma. Variables potencialmente confusoras: edad, género, característica de zona de residencia en pacientes y variables de los médicos. RESULTADOS: La edad media fue de 66,36 (desviación estándar -DE- 11,56 años); el 48,9% eran mujeres. Los IPr con mejor cumplimiento fueron la exploración de pies, HbA1c y perfil lipídico (59,6, 44,3 y 44, respectivamente). El 2,7% de los pacientes presentaban cumplimiento simultáneo de los 6 IPr y el 11,74% de los 3 IPr vinculados a incentivos. El cumplimiento de IPr vinculado y no a incentivos mostró asociación significativa (p = 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: El cumplimiento de los IPr para el cribado de complicaciones crónicas de la DM2 es en su mayoría bajo, aunque este fue superior en los indicadores vinculados a incentivos
OBJECTIVE: Pay-for-performance programs to improve the quality of health care are extending gradually, particularly en Primary Health Care. Our aim was to explore the relationship between the degree of compliance with the process indicators (PrI) of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Primary Care and linkage to incentives. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study. SETTING: Six Primary Health Care centers in Seville Aljarafe District randomly selected and stratified by population size. PARTICIPANTS: From 3.647 adults included in Integrated Healthcare Process of T2DM during 2008, 366 patients were included according sample size calculation by stratified random sampling. Measurements: PrI: eye and feet examination, glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, microalbuminuria and electrocardiogram. Confounding: Age, gender, characteristics town for patients and professional variables. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.36 years (standard deviation [DE]: 11,56); 48.9% were women. PrI with better compliance were feet examination, glycated hemoglobin and lipid profile (59.6%, 44.3% and 44%, respectively). 2.7% of patients had simultaneous compliance of the six PrI and 11.74% of patients three PrI linkage to incentives. Statistical association was observed in the compliance of the PrI incentives linked or not (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of compliance with the PrI for screening chronic complications of T2DM is mostly low but this was higher on indicators linked to incentives
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Patient Care/ethics , Patient Care/methods , Societies/ethics , Societies/policies , Reimbursement, Incentive/ethics , Reimbursement, Incentive/economics , Observational Studies as Topic/instrumentation , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/classification , Patient Care/classification , Patient Care/economics , Societies/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies/statistics & numerical data , Reimbursement, Incentive/legislation & jurisprudence , Reimbursement, Incentive/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pay-for-performance programs to improve the quality of health care are extending gradually, particularly en Primary Health Care. Our aim was to explore the relationship between the degree of compliance with the process indicators (PrI) of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Primary Care and linkage to incentives. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study. SETTING: Six Primary Health Care centers in Seville Aljarafe District randomly selected and stratified by population size. PARTICIPANTS: From 3.647 adults included in Integrated Healthcare Process of T2DM during 2008, 366 patients were included according sample size calculation by stratified random sampling. MEASUREMENTS: PrI: eye and feet examination, glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, microalbuminuria and electrocardiogram. Confounding: Age, gender, characteristics town for patients and professional variables. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.36 years (standard deviation [DE]: 11,56); 48.9% were women. PrI with better compliance were feet examination, glycated hemoglobin and lipid profile (59.6%, 44.3% and 44%, respectively). 2.7% of patients had simultaneous compliance of the six PrI and 11.74% of patients three PrI linkage to incentives. Statistical association was observed in the compliance of the PrI incentives linked or not (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of compliance with the PrI for screening chronic complications of T2DM is mostly low but this was higher on indicators linked to incentives.
