Longitudinal Change in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Type 2 Diabetes and Early Diabetic Polyneuropathy: ADDITION-Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal development of neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in type 2 diabetes with and without diabetic polyneuropathy (+/-DPN) and to explore the predictive potential of NfL as a biomarker for DPN. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed retrospective longitudinal case-control analysis of data from 178 participants of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care-Denmark (ADDITION-Denmark) cohort of people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Biobank samples acquired at the ADDITION-Denmark 5- and 10-year follow-ups were analyzed for serum NfL (s-NfL) using single-molecule array, and the results were compared with established reference material to obtain NfL z-scores. DPN was diagnosed according to Toronto criteria for confirmed DPN at the 10-year follow-up. RESULTS: s-NfL increased over time in +DPN (N = 39) and -DPN participants (N = 139) at levels above normal age-induced s-NfL increase. Longitudinal s-NfL change was greater in +DPN than in -DPN participants (17.4% [95% CI 4.3; 32.2] or 0.31 SD [95% CI 0.03; 0.60] higher s-NfL or NfL z-score increase in +DPN compared with -DPN). s-NfL at the 5-year follow-up was positively associated with nerve conduction studies at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.02 to <0.001), but not with DPN risk. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for s-NfL were not inferior to AUCs for the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire score or vibration detection thresholds. Higher yearly s-NfL increase was associated with higher DPN risk (odds ratio 1.36 [95% CI 1.08; 1.71] per 1 ng/L/year). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that preceding s-NfL trajectories differ slightly between those with and without DPN and imply a possible biomarker value of s-NfL trajectories in DPN.

Serum neurofilament light chain - A potential biomarker for polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes?

AIMS: To investigate the relationship between neurofilament light chain (NfL) and the presence and severity of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analysis of data from 178 participants of the ADDITION-Denmark cohort of people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes and 32 healthy controls. Biobank serum samples were analyzed for NfL using single-molecule array. DPN was defined by Toronto criteria for confirmed DPN. Original and axonal nerve conduction study (NCS) sum z-scores were used as indicators of the severity of DPN and peripheral nerve damage. RESULTS: 39 (21.9%) participants had DPN. Serum NfL (s-NfL) was significantly higher in participants with DPN (18.8 ng/L [IQR 14.4; 27.9]) than in participants without DPN (15.4 ng/L [IQR 11.7; 20.1]). There were no unadjusted s-NfL differences between controls (17.6 ng/L [IQR 12.7; 19.8]) and participants with or without DPN. Higher original and axonal NCS sum z-scores were associated with 10% higher s-NfL (10.2 and 12.1% [95% CI's 4.0; 16.8 and 6.6; 17.9] per 1 SD). The AUC of s-NfL for DPN was 0.63 (95% CI 0.52; 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: S-NfL is unlikely to be a reliable biomarker for the presence of DPN. S-NfL is however associated tothe severity of the nerve damage underlying DPN.

Prospective Study of Neuropathic Symptoms Preceding Clinically Diagnosed Diabetic Polyneuropathy: ADDITION-Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) follows the hypothesis for the course of nerve fiber damage reflected by symptoms progressing from pure small through mixed to large nerve fiber symptoms with or without symptoms of loss of function of small nerve fibers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Repeated assessments of nerve fiber-specific symptoms were obtained in 518 participants of the ADDITION-Denmark study from the time of a screening-based diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using specific items of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire. DPN was clinically assessed 13 years after inclusion. The course of symptoms reflecting dysfunction of specific nerve fibers was evaluated, and the association between symptoms and DPN was estimated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: An overall stable, yet heterogeneous course of symptoms was seen. According to the hypothesis of symptom progression, 205 (40%) participants remained free of symptoms and 56 (11%) had stable, 114 (23%) progressing, and 132 (26%) improving symptoms. Cross-sectional estimates showed a higher risk of DPN (odds ratios between 2.1 and 4.1) for participants with mixed or large nerve fiber symptoms with or without symptoms of loss of function of small nerve fibers compared with participants without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence for a progressive development of nerve fiber damage in DPN reflected by symptoms going from pure small through mixed to large nerve fiber symptoms with or without symptoms of loss of function of small nerve fibers. Yet overall, neuropathic symptoms were prospectively associated with a higher risk of DPN.