ABSTRACT
The aim was to present the content of the newly developed observer rating scale of work ability--The Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS)--and its basic psychometric properties. Psychiatric disorders cause functional impairment in several domains, including occupational functioning. The assessment of work-related functioning is often neglected in psychiatric research, partly due to a lack of reliable and valid instruments. The validity of OFS was evaluated by comparing it with other work ability measures (SAS-work, Work Ability Index, sickness absence) and to non-work-ability related measures [Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), Symptom Check List - General Symptomatic Index (SCL-90-GSI)] in 150 patients with depressive or anxiety disorders. Reliability was determined by 39 videotaped interviews rated by four judges. OFS showed excellent inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.91) and good criterion validity by being more strongly related to other scales of occupational functioning (mid R:rmid R: = 0.39-0.47) than to measures of general distress (SCL-90-GSI) and interpersonal problems (IIP)(mid R:rmid R: = 0.26 and 0.12). OFS is a simple, reliable and clinically meaningful instrument for assessment of work ability in depressive and anxiety disorders.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Disability Evaluation , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Absenteeism , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/rehabilitation , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Interview, Psychological , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Occupational Diseases/rehabilitation , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/psychology , Personality Disorders/rehabilitation , Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Phobic Disorders/rehabilitation , Psychometrics , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Reproducibility of Results , Sick Leave , Social AdjustmentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this investigation was to analyze craniofacial morphology in children with distal bites, large overjets, and deepbites in the early mixed dentition. METHODS: The sample comprised 486 Finnish children who are participating in an ongoing clinical trial. Cephalograms were obtained at the deciduous-mixed dentition interphase for the baseline of the trial. The mean age of the children was 5.1 years (SD, 2.6; range, 4.0-7.8 years). RESULTS: Subjects with bilateral distal steps of > or =1 mm compared with normal had long midfaces (P <.05), short and retrusive mandibles (P <.05), small maxillomandibular differentials (P <.001), convex profiles (P <.01), retrusive mandibular incisors (P <.01), and large interincisal angles (P <.001). Children with overjets of > or =4 mm had retrusive mandibles (P <.001), long maxillae and midfaces (P <.001), small maxillomandibular differentials (P <.001), convex profiles (P <.001), and protrusive maxillary and retrusive mandibular incisors (P <.001). Children with deepbites (overbites of > or =4 mm) had short and retrusive mandibles (P <.05), long midfaces (P <.001) and maxillae (P <.05), small maxillomandibular differentials (P <.001), convex profiles (P <.01), retrusive mandibular incisors (P <.001), and large interincisal angles (P <.001). No differences were found in the length of anterior cranial base, the position of maxilla relative to cranial base, lower facial height, and facial axis angle between any malocclusion group and normal children. All correlations between the occlusal and skeletal characteristics were low, suggesting only weak associations at this stage of development. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the early dentofacial features of children with distal occlusions, large overjets, and deepbites differ from normal values. However, the skeletal patterns of these 3 malocclusion types showed considerable similarities, with long but neutrally positioned maxillae, retrusive mandibles, small maxillomandibular differences, convex profiles, retrusive mandibular incisors, and large interincisal angles, but normal growth directions and lower facial heights as common features.
