Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet J ; 251: 105345, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31492389

ABSTRACT

A constant rate infusion (CRI) of medetomidine is used to balance equine inhalation anesthesia, but its cardiovascular side effects are a concern. This experimental crossover study aimed to evaluate the effects of vatinoxan (a peripheral α2-adrenoceptor antagonist) on cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal function in anesthetized healthy horses. Six horses received medetomidine hydrochloride 7µg/kg IV alone (MED) or with vatinoxan hydrochloride 140µg/kg IV (MED+V). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam and ketamine and maintained with isoflurane and medetomidine CRI for 60min. Heart rate, carotid and pulmonary arterial pressures, central venous pressure, cardiac output and arterial and mixed venous blood gases were measured. Selected cardiopulmonary parameters were calculated. Plasma drug concentrations were determined. Fecal output was measured over 24h. For statistical comparisons, repeated measures analysis of covariance and paired t-tests were applied. Heart rate decreased slightly from baseline in the MED group. Arterial blood pressures decreased with both treatments, but significantly more dobutamine was needed to maintain normotension with MED+V (P=0.018). Cardiac index (CI) and oxygen delivery index (DO2I) decreased significantly more with MED, with the largest difference observed at 20min: CI was 39±2 and 73±18 (P=0.009) and DO2I 7.4±1.2 and 15.3±4.8 (P=0.014)mL/min/kg with MED and MED+V, respectively. Fecal output or plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine did not differ between the treatments. In conclusion, premedication with vatinoxan induced hypotension, thus its use in anesthetized horses warrants further studies. Even though heart rate and arterial blood pressures remained clinically acceptable with MED, cardiac performance and oxygen delivery were lower than with MED+V.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinary , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Animals , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Horses , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Male , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/blood , Quinolizines/pharmacokinetics
2.
Equine Vet J ; 51(5): 646-652, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medetomidine suppresses cardiovascular function and reduces gastrointestinal motility in horses mainly through peripheral α2 -adrenoceptors. Vatinoxan, a peripheral α2 -antagonist, has been shown experimentally to alleviate the adverse effects of some α2 -agonists in horses. However, vatinoxan has not been investigated during constant-rate infusion (CRI) of medetomidine in standing horses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of vatinoxan on cardiovascular function, gastrointestinal motility and on sedation level during CRI of medetomidine. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, randomised, blinded, cross-over study. METHODS: Six healthy horses were given medetomidine hydrochloride, 7 µg/kg i.v., without (MED) and with (MED+V) vatinoxan hydrochloride, 140 µg/kg i.v., followed by CRI of medetomidine at 3.5 µg/kg/h for 60 min. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded and borborygmi and sedation levels were scored for 120 min. Plasma drug concentrations were measured. The data were analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA and paired t-tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Initially heart rate (HR) was significantly lower and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) significantly higher with MED compared with MED+V. For example at 10 min HR (mean ± s.d.) was 26 ± 2 and 31 ± 5 beats/minute (P = 0.04) and MAP 129 ± 15 and 103 ± 13 mmHg (P<0.001) respectively. At 10 min, cardiac index was lower (P = 0.02) and systemic vascular resistance higher (P = 0.001) with MED than with MED+V. Borborygmi were reduced after MED; this effect was attenuated by vatinoxan (P<0.001). All horses were sedated with medetomidine, but the mean sedation scores were reduced with MED+V until 20 min (6.8 ± 0.8 and 4.5 ± 1.5 with MED and MED+V, respectively, at 10 min, P = 0.001). Plasma concentration of dexmedetomidine was significantly lower in the presence of vatinoxan (P = 0.01). MAIN LIMITATIONS: Experimental study with healthy, unstimulated animals. CONCLUSIONS: Vatinoxan administered i.v. with a loading dose of medetomidine improved cardiovascular function and gastrointestinal motility during medetomidine CRI in healthy horses. Sedation was slightly yet significantly reduced during the first 20 min.. The Summary is available in Portuguese - see Supporting Information.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Horses , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Respiration/drug effects , Animals , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Half-Life , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Medetomidine/metabolism , Medetomidine/pharmacokinetics , Quinolizines/administration & dosage , Vascular Resistance/drug effects
3.
Vet Rec ; 180(10): 250, 2017 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27980080

ABSTRACT

The purpose here was to determine the problems cat owners encounter in medicating their cats with orally administered drugs at home. The study was carried out as an open e-questionnaire survey addressed to cat owners in which the authors focused on the oral administration route. A total of 46 completed questionnaires were included in the survey. In the study, 46 cats received 67 orally administered drugs. Approximately half of the drugs were registered for use in cats by the European Medicines Agency (54 per cent), and there were also off-label drugs registered for human (36 per cent) and canine medication (7.4 per cent) and an ex tempore drug (3.0 per cent). The owners were unable to give the doses as prescribed for their cats for one-fourth of the medications (16/67). Drugs that were registered for feline medication were significantly more palatable than drugs registered for other species (odds ratio (OR) 4.9), and liquid formulations were significantly more palatable than solid formulations (OR 4.8). However, most of the owners (22/38) preferred a solid dosage form, while few (4/38) chose a liquid formulation. The results indicate that there is still a need for more palatable and easily administered oral drugs for cats.


Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Cat Diseases/drug therapy , Pets/psychology , Animals , Cats , Drug Compounding/veterinary , Humans , Ownership , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...