Suboptimal management of rheumatoid arthritis in France: a real-world study based on data from the French National Health Data System.

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of targeted therapy is changing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management, but real-world data remain limited. This study aimed to describe real-world RA treatment patterns using data from a French national claims database. METHODS: This longitudinal study used the French Permanent Representative Sample (Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires) claims database. Patients with RA were identified between 2013 and 2017, with treatment patterns, persistence and adherence described. RESULTS: The study population included 2553 patients with RA. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were prescribed for 1512 (59.2%) patients, of whom 721 (47.6%) did not require discontinuation or treatment switch. There were 377 (24.9%) treatment discontinuations and 114 patients (7.5%) switched to a targeted DMARD (biological and synthetic (Janus kinase inhibitor) DMARDs). Among the 2315 patients with RA in 2017, almost half (n=1102, 47.6%) were not treated with a DMARD. Most (85.7%) received symptomatic treatment (analgesics (81.0%), steroids (49.2%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (39.5%)). Of the 1142 treatment initiations identified, 713 (62.4%) were conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), with methotrexate being the most frequent (n=553, 48.45%). One-year persistence rates varied between 55.9% (49.2-62.0%) for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, and 63.4% (59.6-67.0%) for csDMARDs. Treatment adherence, assessed through medication possession ratio, varied between 71.9% and 90.8%, with ≥80% being the adherence cut-off. Almost half of DMARD initiations were associated with long-term (>6 months), high-dose oral steroid use (~7 mg/day prednisone equivalent). CONCLUSION: Despite a diverse therapeutic arsenal, there remains a medical need that is not covered by current RA management, which is frequently compensated for by overprescription of steroids.

Severity and burden of sickle cell disease in France: a nationwide real-world study.

The burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) in France has been difficult to apprehend due to the paucity of reliable nationwide epidemiological data. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of SCD and evaluate its burden and costs. Patients with SCD and most severely affected patients were identified between 2012 and 2018 from the French National Health Data System database (SNDS, Système national des données de santé). Outcomes of interest included rates of acute and chronic complications, healthcare resource utilization and associated costs, and were compared in subpopulations of patients before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, initiating hydroxyurea or a chronic transfusion program. Between 2012 and 2018, 22,619 patients with SCD were identified, among which 4,270 patients were defined as most severely affected. Rates of vaso-occlusion episodes and acute chest syndrome were 86.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.75-86.83] and 12.90 (95% CI: 12.69-13.11) per 100 person years in the study population and 166.9 (95% CI: 165.4- 168.4) and 22.71 (95% CI: 22.16-23.27) per 100 person years in most severely affected patients. Median (Q1-Q3) annualized total costs were €5,073.63 (range, €1,633.74-14,000.94) and €13,295.67 (range, €5,754.67-26,385.23) in the study population and most severely affected patients. Median annualized costs were ten times lower after treatment intensification for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (€29,011.75 vs. €2,465.98; P<0.001), they slightly decreased after hydroxyurea initiation (€13,057.79 vs. €12,752.44; P=0.003) and were five times higher after chronic transfusion program initiation (€4,643.11 vs. €22,715.85; P<0.001). SCD still places a significant demand on health resources, even after therapeutic intensification.

Real-life management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in France: a nationwide observational study using retrospective claims data.

AIMS: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is standard care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but the recommended monthly injection regimen is burdensome. Evidence suggests low injection/monitoring frequencies in clinical practice and suboptimal vision outcomes. This observational cohort study uses administrative claims data from the French national healthcare system to assess anti-VEGF treatment patterns and nAMD-specific healthcare resource demands and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: nAMD patients ≥50 years initiating intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment (2014‒2015), and propensity score-matched non-nAMD patients (controls), were identified from the Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires database. Outcomes of interest included anti-VEGF treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization and associated costs of patients vis-à-vis controls over 24 months. RESULTS: Study patients (n = 355) received (mean) 5.2 and 2.4 anti-VEGF injections over 0‒12 and 12‒24 months, respectively. Most patients (79.0%) remained on their initial anti-VEGF agent; among treatment switchers, the most common transition was from ranibizumab to aflibercept. During follow-up, nAMD patients were more likely than controls to require ophthalmology visits (99.7% vs. 44.8%), ocular procedures (optical coherence tomography/angiography/fundoscopy) (96.9% vs. 27.2%), cataract surgery (13.0% vs. 6.7%), and medical transports (38.0% vs. 31.9%). Mean numbers of ophthalmology visits (25.1 vs. 1.2) and medical transports (6.0 vs. 3.5) were higher (p<.01) among nAMD patients. Total reimbursed costs were two-fold higher for nAMD patients than controls (mean €16,799 vs. €8,255) due to higher treatment costs (€6,847 vs. €1,156), medical fees (€1,858 vs. €295), hospital fees (€6,396 vs. €5,235), and transport costs (€358 vs. €259). Excess total healthcare cost was (mean) €5,279 and €7,918 over the first 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment and monitoring requirements place a considerable economic burden on the French healthcare system. New intravitreal therapies with extended dosing intervals and predictable efficacy might reduce demand for ophthalmology services.