[Young children with serious disorders as a result of late diagnosis of cystic fibrosis]. / Jonge kinderen met ernstige afwijkingen door laat herkende cystische fibrose.

A girl and a boy, who both presented with recurrent respiratory infections from birth, were referred to a paediatrician at the age of 2.5 years: they were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF). The girl died from respiratory insufficiency at the age of 6 years and the boy at the age of 13 years from pulmonary aspiration. A further girl and boy who presented with abnormal faeces and failure to thrive were referred to the paediatrician at the ages of 2.5 months with haematomas and 2 weeks with anaemia respectively, as a result of vitamin deficiencies due to malabsorption. They too had CF. The girl had a brain haemorrhage in the meantime that left her with serious impairments. The boy recovered. A delay in diagnosing CF is not uncommon, as the symptoms of CF are hard to differentiate from those of common childhood diseases. However, this diagnostic delay can result in serious organ damage. Current treatment of CF has a predominantly prophylactic character and aims at maintaining normal growth and nutritional status as well as at preventing or postponing chronic bacterial infection of the lower respiratory tract. This treatment is most effective when it is started before any organ damage has occurred: a state that can only be achieved when patients with CF are identified shortly after birth. Therefore, it is important to add CF-screening to the neonatal screening program.

[Varicella: previously healthy children sometimes develop complications]. / Waterpokken: soms complicaties bij voorheen gezonde kinderen.

Three healthy boys, 3.5, 5 and 1.5 years of age, were admitted to hospital with a severe bacterial skin infection, cerebellar ataxia, and pneumonia, respectively, one week after the onset of varicella. They recovered completely after treatment. Studies in Europe report complications from varicella in 2.5% of healthy children. Most of these are neurological complications and secondary bacterial infections of skin and soft tissue. Last year, a European consensus was published that recommended that all healthy children be vaccinated against chickenpox. In The Netherlands, routine varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccination has not (yet) been implemented. We propose a new discussion on the possible inclusion of VZV vaccination in the national vaccination programme.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: This review was performed to test the hypothesis that presymptomatic diagnosis, for example by newborn screening, and early treatment may prevent or reduce irreversible organ damage and thereby improve outcome and quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is evidence that early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis by means of neonatal screening, followed by current treatment, improves survival and long term morbidity, without unacceptable adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Trials Register. Additional studies were identified by one of the reviewers from handsearching conference proceedings not included in the Cochrane Register. Pharmaceutical companies manufacturing screening tests for cystic fibrosis were also contacted to identify any trials of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: January 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or pseudorandomised controlled trials, published and unpublished, comparing screening followed by early treatment to clinical diagnosis and later treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality and two of these reviewers independently extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials involving a total of 1,124,483 neonates met inclusion criteria. A total of 210 patients with cystic fibrosis aged from zero to 11 years with a maximum follow-up of eleven years are included. Concealment of allocation was unclear in both studies. Sequence generation was adequate in one study and unclear in the other. Method to ascertain cases was similar in one study and not similar in the other. An intention-to-screen-analysis was possible in one study, but could not be made due to lack of data and was not performed in the other. Differences in study design, variation in outcomes reported and their summary measures precluded calculation of pooled screening estimates. Only data from one study could be analysed in this review. This study reported a reduced risk of weight and height below the fifth percentile among screened patients (odds ratio control compared with screened group for: weight 6.16, 95% CI 2.44, 15.57 and height 5.03, 95% CI 1.63, 15.63). Adverse effects among parents in the screened and control populations were examined, but it is difficult to assess how meaningful these results are as the timing of the administration of the questionnaire to each group was not clear. Estimation of direct medical costs of screening suggested it was cheaper to diagnose cystic fibrosis by screening rather than other methods. The costing methods used however were not fully described and costs have not been related to effect. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are few randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of neonatal screening in cystic fibrosis. From the data available at this time, there is little evidence suggesting benefit from screening for cystic fibrosis in the neonatal period, although there is similarly little evidence of harm. This systematic review has identified the need for individual patient data from both included studies. Although we have not been able to perform a meta-analysis, this review provides a summary of all the information currently available from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Influence of neonatal screening and centralized treatment on long-term clinical outcome and survival of CF patients.

After an experimental neonatal screening program for cystic fibrosis (CF) from 1973-1979, a follow-up study took place from 1980-1997. Patients were treated at specialized centres (C) or at local hospitals (non-C). Aims of the study were: 1) to determine whether the previously reported benefits from screening persisted with time and after adjustment for confounding variables; and 2) to investigate whether centre treatment was associated with improved prognosis of CF patients. Prognosis of patients detected by screening (S; n=24) was compared with patients detected clinically, born during (non-S; n=29) and after the screening programme (post-S; n=39). In addition, prognosis was compared between 45 C and 47 non-C patients. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare survival and mixed-effects model regression analysis was used to compare clinical outcome between patients. The analyses included the variables screening, centre treatment, sex, meconium ileus and genotype. S patients had a significantly smaller decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEVI) (difference +2.74% predicted) and significantly lower immunoglobulin-G (IgG) levels (difference -473.69 mg x dL(-1)) than non-S patients until 12 yrs of age. At 12 yrs of age, vital capacity was significantly higher in S patients than in non-S patients (difference +362.79 mL). Survival seemed to be best for S patients compared to both non-S and post-S patients. Post-S patients were significantly heavier (difference in SD weight +0.77), had a significantly smaller decline in FEV1 (difference +2.80% pred) and lower IgG levels (difference -453.04 mg x dL(-1)) than non-S patients until 12 yrs of age. C patients had a significantly improved survival (relative risk (RR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.57) than non-C patients. Early diagnosis through neonatal screening leads to better preservation of lung function in the long term in cystic fibrosis patients. Management of cystic fibrosis patients in specialized centres improves survival.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: This review was performed to test the hypothesis that presymptomatic diagnosis, for example by newborn screening, and early treatment may prevent or reduce irreversible organ damage and thereby improve outcome and quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is evidence that early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis by means of neonatal screening, followed by current treatment, improves survival and long term morbidity, without unacceptable adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Trials Register. Additional studies were identified by one of the reviewers from handsearching conference proceedings not included in the Cochrane Register. Pharmaceutical companies manufacturing screening tests for cystic fibrosis were also contacted to identify any trials of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Date of the most recent search of the Group's specialised register: November 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or pseudorandomised controlled trials, published and unpublished, comparing screening followed by early treatment to clinical diagnosis and later treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality and two of these reviewers independently extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials involving a total of 1,124,483 neonates met inclusion criteria. A total of 210 patients with cystic fibrosis aged from zero to 11 years with a maximum follow-up of eleven years are included. Concealment of allocation was unclear in both studies. Sequence generation was adequate in one study and unclear in the other. Method to ascertain cases was similar in one study and not similar in the other. An intention-to-screen-analysis was possible in one study, but could not be made due to lack of data and was not performed in the other. Differences in study design, variation in outcomes reported and their summary measures precluded calculation of pooled screening estimates. Only data from one study could be analysed in this review. This study reported a reduced risk of weight and height below the fifth percentile among screened patients (odds ratio control compared with screened group for: weight 6.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.44, 15.57 and height 5.03, 95% CI 1. 63, 15.63). Adverse effects among parents in the screened and control populations were examined, but it is difficult to assess how meaningful these results are as the timing of the administration of the questionnaire to each group was not clear. Estimation of direct medical costs of screening suggested it was cheaper to diagnose cystic fibrosis by screening rather than other methods. The costing methods used however were not fully described and costs have not been related to effect. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are few randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of neonatal screening in cystic fibrosis. From the data available at this time, there is little evidence suggesting benefit from screening for cystic fibrosis in the neonatal period, although there is similarly little evidence of harm. This systematic review has identified the need for individual patient data from both included studies. Although we have not been able to perform a meta-analysis, this review provides a summary of all the information currently available from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.