ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effectiveness of preventive cervical cerclage for twin pregnancy with obstetrical history. METHODS: Through this retrospective cohort study, subjects exposed between 2002 and 2017 were compared with unexposed ones. All patients who had twin pregnancy with at least one previous late pregnancy loss or prematurity before 34SA were included. Two groups were compared: "preventive cerclage" versus "no preventive cerclage". The outcome was the prematurity before 34 gestation weeks (GW) rate. RESULTS: Among 1972 twin pregnancies registered between 2002 and 2017, 69 (3.5%) patients with at least one previous late pregnancy loss or prematurity before 34 GW, were part of the study. There were 20 (29.0%) women in the group "preventive cerclage" and 49 (71.0%) women in the group "no preventive cerclage". Women in the "preventive cerclage" group had poorer obstetrical history. The rate of prematurity before 34GW was not significantly different between these both groups (45.0% versus 44.9%; P=0.99, crude OR: 1.00 (0.35-2.83), adjusted OR: 1.06 (0.33-3.44)). CONCLUSIONS: The prematurity rate before 34GW, in twin pregnancies with a previous late pregnancy loss or preterm birth, is not different with or without preventive cervical cerclage.
