Protocol of a multicentric prospective cohort study for the VALIDation of the IBD-disk instrument for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases: the VALIDate study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) affect psychological, family, social and professional dimensions of patients' life, leading to disability which is essential to quantify as part of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) newly included in the targets to reach in IBD patients. Up to now, the IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI) was the only validated tool to assess disability, but it is not appropriate for use in clinical practice. The IBD Disk was developed, a shortened and self-administered tool, adapted from the IBD-DI, in order to give immediate representation of patient-reported disability. However, the IBD Disk has not been validated yet in clinical practice. The aims of the VALIDate study are to validate this tool in a large population of IBD patients and to compare it to the already validated IBD-DI. METHODS: The VALIDate study is an ongoing multicentric prospective cohort study launched in April 2018 in 3 French University Hospitals (Nantes, Rennes, Angers), with an objective to reach a sample of 400 patients over a period inclusion of 6 months. Each patient will fill in the two questionnaires IBD Disk and IBD-DI at baseline, then between 3 and 12 months later, during a follow-up visit. Clinical and socio-demographic data will also be collected. During these two consultations, gastroenterologists and patients will evaluate disease activity thanks to a semi-quantitative 4-grade scale, named respectively PGA (Physician Global Assessment) and PtGA (Patient Global Assessment). This cohort will allow to evaluate the validity of the IBD Disk with respect to the IBD-DI in order to generalize its use for clinical practice. Other psychometric criteria of the IBD Disk will also be analysed as its reliability or its discriminant capacity. Close attention will nonetheless be needed to minimize the number of lost to follow-up patients between baseline and follow-up. DISCUSSION: The VALIDate study is the study designed to validate the IBD Disk, a visual tool easily useable in daily practice to assess disability in IBD patients. The results of this trial should enable the diffusion of this tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov with registration number NCT03590639. First posted: July 18, 2018.

Risk factors for symptomatic esophageal stricture after caustic ingestion-a retrospective cohort study.

Esophageal stricture is a major secondary complication of ingesting caustic agents. We examined our experiences with caustic injuries with a view to finding clinical and biological risk factors of esophageal strictures secondary to caustic ingestion. Records were retrieved for 58 adults admitted consecutively to our intensive care unit for caustic ingestion. Fifty cases were managed conservatively and therefore retained for analyses. Patients were grouped according to whether they developed strictures or not during the follow-up period. Mucosal damage was assessed by emergency endoscopy. Eleven patients (22%) developed a stricture. At referral, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and hematemesis were associated with secondary stricture (respectively P = 0.047, P = 0.008, P = 0.02). A high Zargar endoscopic grade (above IIa; P = 0.02), the ingestion of strong acids or alkalis (P = 0.006), hyperleukocytosis (P = 0.02), and a low prothrombin ratio (P = 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of developing a stricture. The median delay of stricture diagnosis was 12 (8;16) days after ingestion, with extreme values from 4 to 26 days. Initial symptoms such as dysphagia or hematemesis, early endoscopy showing >IIa grade esophagitis, and certain laboratory results should draw the physician's attention to a high risk of esophageal stricture.

Human papillomavirus does not play a role in the Barrett esophagus: a French cohort.

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) has been examined but remains unclear. The purpose of the study is to dispute the connection between HPV and BE in a prospective case-control study. Biopsies were performed above and inside the Barrett's segment for BE patients and in the distal third of the esophagus for control patients for histological interpretation and for virological analysis. Biopsies for virological analysis were placed in a virus transport medium and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Virological analysis involved real-time PCR using the SyBr® green protocol with modified SPF10 general primers. A total of 180 patients (119 control and 61 BE, respectively) were included. In BE patients, 31, 18, and 12 patients had, respectively, no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high grade dysplasia. Overall, nine were found to be HPV positive: five were control patients and four BE patients. HPV positive status was not associated with BE. No factors were associated with HPV, in particular the degree of BE dysplasia. HPV infection appears unlikely to be significant in the etiology of BE compared with control patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT02549053).

p53 mutations in british patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: clustering in genetic hemochromatosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Environmental factors are important in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Aflatoxin B1 causes a specific point mutation in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene in exposed individuals. In Western populations, mutations of this gene seem to be less frequent. We have investigated the role of p53 mutations in tumorigenesis in British patients with HCC. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and mutational spectrum of the p53 gene in HCCs from British patients. METHODS: DNA from 170 HCCs, of well-defined etiology, in British patients was analyzed by single-stranded conformational polymorphism using the polymerase chain reaction technique. Mutations were then characterized by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of tumors had p53 mutations. Ten of 14 (71%) hemochromatotic cancers had mutations within the p53 gene, and clustering of these mutations at codon 220 (A-G) was found in 5 cases; 3 others had T-A mutations. No clustering was found in HCCs with other etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: p53 mutations are more common than was thought in Northern European HCCs. This is the first demonstration of p53 mutational clustering in HCCs from hemochromatotic subjects.

Hepatitis G infection: role in cryptogenic chronic liver disease and primary liver cell cancer in the UK. Trent Hepatitis C virus Study Group.

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a flavivirus that can cause acute hepatitis and persistent infection but its role in chronic liver disease or primary liver cancer is unproven. In this study we have examined the prevalence of HGV RNA in the serum of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and in patients with cryptogenic chronic liver disease, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and in patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HCC arising in patients with cryptogenic liver disease. One-hundred and thirty patients who were positive for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), 54 patients with cryptogenic chronic liver disease (including 17 patients with NASH) and 46 patients with hepatitis C-related (n = 27) or cryptogenic liver disease-related HCC (n = 19) were studied. HGV RNA was detected using nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and was found in 16.1% of patients with HCV infection. HGV RNA was not detected in any patient with cryptogenic liver disease. In patients with HCC, 7/34 samples were positive for HGV RNA and six out of seven HGV-positive subjects also had HCV infection. Only one patient with HCC in cryptogenic liver disease was positive for HGV RNA. Hence, cryptogenic liver disease in the UK is not caused by HGV/GBVc infection. It seems unlikely that HGV plays a significant role in hepatocarcinogenesis.

Hepatitis C virus infection in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The role of hepatitis C virus replication and different genotypes in the progression of cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma is examined on the basis of a prospective follow-up of 1438 patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. METHODS: The presence of HCV RNA, anti-HCV and characterisation of virus genotypes were determined in 72 cases who developed hepatocellular carcinoma after a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range 1 to 16) and compared to 72 controls who had cirrhosis only, after a median follow-up of 4.8 years (range 1 to 16). Patients in the hepatocellular carcinoma group and controls were matched, one to one, for age, sex, nationality, HBsAg seropositivity, duration of follow-up and aetiology of cirrhosis. RESULTS: HCV RNA was detected in 31 of 72 (44%) patients who developed hepatocellular carcinoma, significantly more frequently than in 17 of 72 (23%) controls with cirrhosis (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 5.0; p = 0.013). When cirrhosis of different aetiologies was analysed, hepatitis C virus replication was more frequently detected in patients developing hepatocellular carcinoma in association with cryptogenic cirrhosis (p = 0.007), alcoholic cirrhosis (p = 0.043) and hepatitis B virus seronegative cirrhosis (p = 0.05). Hepatitis C virus genotypes 1b and 4 were the most prevalent; they were found in 53% and 25%, respectively, of the patients studied, but were equally distributed between cirrhosis progressing to hepatocellular carcinoma and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent hepatitis C virus replication is closely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma development in cirrhosis, and there is no preferential role of individual hepatitis C virus genotypes.

Use of specific ELISA for the detection of antibodies directed against p53 protein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIMS: To analyse the significance of antibodies to p53 protein as a serological marker for changes in p53 gene expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty eight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 19 showing accumulation of p53 protein by immunohistochemistry and 19 having no accumulation, were studied. The presence of anti-p53 was tested using a novel ELISA utilising a recombinant p53 protein as a capture system and verified by western blotting. p53 gene mutations were sought by single strand conformational polymorphism and DNA sequencing analyses. RESULTS: Of 19 patients with p53 protein accumulation in tumour tissue, 10 (52%) had antibodies to p53 in serum by ELISA. Four patients with p53 negative immunohistochemistry also had detectable anti-p53. Western blot analysis confirmed the specificity of the ELISA positive serum samples. The presence of anti-p53 was independent of serum alpha-fetoprotein and was detected in 50% of small tumours while only 8% were alpha-fetoprotein positive. Mutations affecting exons 5 and 6 seem to be more frequently associated with development of anti-p53, than mutations in exons 7 or 8. CONCLUSIONS: The ELISA for anti-p53 is a convenient and specific tet for the detection of humoral response to alterations in p53 gene expression and could be of value in the diagnosis and characterisation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chemoembolisation with lipiodol and doxorubicin: applicability in British patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chemoembolisation has been extensively used as primary treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this unit, 185 patients with a new diagnosis of HCC not amenable to surgery were seen between 1988 and 1991. Intended therapy for these patients was chemoembolisation with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and lipiodol, repeated at six week intervals until it was technically no longer possible or until complete tumour response had been obtained. Chemoembolisation was possible in 67 of the 185 (37%). Reasons for exclusion were portal vein occlusion (n = 36), decompensated cirrhosis (n = 44), distant metastases (n = 5), diffuse tumour or unsuitable anatomy (tumour or vasculature) (n = 11), patient refusal (n = 11), and other (n = 11). Patients excluded from treatment survived for a median of 10 weeks (range 3 days-19 months). In patients treated, 18 had small HCC (< 4 cm) and 49 had large or multifocal HCC. Chemoembolisation was carried out a median of two sessions for small and three sessions for large tumours. Ten of 18 patients with small HCC showed a 50% or greater reduction in tumour size. Five of 49 patients with large or multifocal tumours showed a response to treatment. Median overall survival for treated patients was 36 weeks (range 3 days-4 years). One patient has subsequently undergone liver transplantation with no recurrence and minimal residual disease at transplantation. Two other patients are alive three years after chemoembolisation, one with no evidence of recurrent disease. No patient was thought suitable for surgery after their response to chemoembolisation. Chemotherapy related complications were seen in 22%. Complications were significantly more common in patients with larger tumours and poor liver reserve. Five patients died as a result of chemotherapy related complications. In conclusion, only one third of UK patients with unresectable HCC are treatable by chemoembolisation. Results with small tumours are encouraging, with a high response rate and the possibility of surgical intervention in previously inoperable disease. Large tumours, however, show a poor response and a significant incidence of side effects, suggesting that this treatment offers little benefit in advanced disease.

Epirubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma: pharmacokinetics and clinical activity.

The pharmacokinetics and clinical activity of epirubicin were investigated in 16 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received epirubicin at 75 mg/m2; the drug was given intravenously to 7 patients and via the hepatic artery to 9 patients (7 of whom also underwent embolisation). Lignocaine (1 mg/kg) was also given intravenously to 15 patients, and the metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) was measured as an indicator of liver function. Epirubicin clearance correlated with serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin and bilirubin values in patients treated intravenously or intraarterially. Although the route of administration did not affect the median total plasma clearance of epirubicin, early- and intermediate-phase clearance was higher following intraarterial administration. MEGX levels correlated with serum bilirubin levels but there was no correlation with albumin or AST values or epirubicin clearance. The rate of response to epirubicin was 3/13 (23%; 95% confidence interval, 8%-50%). Intravenous epirubicin was tolerated well, but intraarterial treatment was associated with significant morbidity. These data confirm that although current recommended dose adjustments are based primarily on serum bilirubin levels, altered epirubicin pharmacokinetics correlate more strongly with AST and albumin values than with serum bilirubin concentrations. However, at this dose and schedule, epirubicin has only modest activity against HCC.

Clinical efficacy and toxicity of standard dose adriamycin in hyperbilirubinaemic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: relation to liver tests and pharmacokinetic parameters.

A standard dose of Adriamycin (60 mg m-2) was administered to 30 patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma, 16 of whom were hyperbilirubinaemic (18-37 mumol l-1). The hyperbilirubinaemic patients experienced marked myelosuppression, but only minor symptomatic side-effects. The degree of neutropenia was directly related to the serum bilirubin concentration, but not to any other standard liver test, presence or absence of cirrhosis, or any pharmacokinetic parameter studied including the area under the Adriamycin or adriamycinol concentration-time curve to 48 h or infinity, or the terminal half-life of Adriamycin. The area under the log concentration-time curve was significantly greater for both Adriamycin and adriamycinol in patients who were hyperbilirubinaemic compared to those with normal bilirubin. Whilst hyperbilirubinaemic patients may tolerate a full dose of Adriamycin, we found no evidence that this was associated with a better response rate, which was disappointingly low at only 18%.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intraarterial adriamycin for hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of coadministration of lipiodol.

To determine the effect of coadministration of lipiodol on the pharmacokinetics and systemic toxicity of intraarterial Adriamycin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, nine patients were studied in detail. Each received two courses of a bolus injection of Adriamycin (60 mg/m2), in one of which the Adriamycin was mixed with 10 ml of lipiodol. Analysis of the paired data, and additional 'non-paired' data from a further seven patients, showed that there was no significant difference in the area under the concentration-time curve for Adriamycin or adriamycinol or, in the case of Adriamycin, the terminal half-life. Likewise the fall in haemoglobin concentration, white cell count and platelet count following treatment, and the degree of nausea and vomiting were not significantly different. Comparison with a series of 12 patients receiving intravenous Adriamycin, in the same dose schedule, revealed no difference in terms of pharmacokinetic parameters or toxicity with intraarterial administration of Adriamycin, with or without lipiodol.

Intraarterial adriamycin and lipiodol for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison with intravenous adriamycin.

The technique of 'targeting' cytotoxic drugs by mixing them with the contrast medium lipiodol is now widely used in Japan and the Far East where it has been reported to enhance response rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In the present study 19 patients with this tumour were treated with intra-(hepatic) arterial adriamycin (60 mg/m2), at least one course of which was combined with lipiodol (10-20 ml). Two patients (11%) had a remission as indicated by a significant fall in serum alphafetoprotein and there was a reduction of tumour size in one of these. The median survival period was 3 months (range 1-18) with the two responding patients surviving 8 and 12 months. This response rate was no better than the figure of 14% seen in 31 consecutive patients treated with intravenous adriamycin at the same dose, and the survival curves of the two groups of patients were not significantly different. Lipiodol in combination with adriamycin is not superior to intravenous adriamycin administered alone.