Evaluation of a multimodal diagnostic algorithm for prediction of cognitive impairment in elderly patients with dizziness.

BACKGROUND: The current diagnostic workup for chronic dizziness in elderly patients often neglects neuropsychological assessment, thus missing a relevant proportion of patients, who perceive dizziness as a subjective chief complaint of a concomitant cognitive impairment. This study aimed to establish risk prediction models for cognitive impairment in chronic dizzy patients based on data sources routinely collected in a dizziness center. METHODS: One hundred patients (age: 74.7 ± 7.1 years, 41.0% women) with chronic dizziness were prospectively characterized by (1) neuro-otological testing, (2) quantitative gait assessment, (3) graduation of focal brain atrophy and white matter lesion load, and (4) cognitive screening (MoCA). A linear regression model was trained to predict patients' total MoCA score based on 16 clinical features derived from demographics, vestibular testing, gait analysis, and imaging scales. Additionally, we trained a binary logistic regression model on the same data sources to identify those patients with a cognitive impairment (i.e., MoCA < 25). RESULTS: The linear regression model explained almost half of the variance of patients' total MoCA score (R2 = 0.49; mean absolute error: 1.7). The most important risk-predictors of cognitive impairment were age (ß = - 0.75), pathological Romberg's sign (ß = - 1.05), normal caloric test results (ß = - 0.8), slower timed-up-and-go test (ß = - 0.67), frontal (ß = - 0.6) and temporal (ß = - 0.54) brain atrophy. The binary classification yielded an area under the curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.70-0.98) in distinguishing between cognitively normal and impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: The need for cognitive testing in patients with chronic dizziness can be efficiently approximated by available data sources from routine diagnostic workup in a dizziness center.

Health-related quality of life and functional impairment in acute vestibular disorders.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute vestibular symptoms have a profound impact on patients' well-being. In this study, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional impairment were investigated prospectively in patients with different peripheral and central vestibular disorders during the acute symptomatic stage to decipher the most relevant underlying factors. METHODS: In all, 175 patients with acute vestibular disorders were categorized as central vestibular (CV, n = 40), peripheral vestibular (PV, n = 68) and episodic vestibular disorders (EV, n = 67). All patients completed scores to quantify generic HRQoL (European Quality of Life Score Five Dimensions Five Levels, EQ-5D-5L) and disease-specific HRQoL (Dizziness Handicap Inventory, DHI). Vestibular-ocular motor signs were assessed by video-oculography, vestibular-spinal control by posturography and verticality perception by measurement of subjective visual vertical. RESULTS: Patients with PV had a poorer HRQoL compared to patients with CV and EV (EQ-5D-5L/DHI: PV, 0.53 ± 0.31/56.1 ± 19.7; CV, 0.66 ± 0.28/43.3 ± 24.0; EV, 0.75 ± 0.24/46.7 ± 21.4). After adjusting for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors and non-vestibular brainstem/cerebellar dysfunction patients with PV persisted to have poorer generic and disease-specific HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L -0.17, DHI +11.2) than patients with CV. Horizontal spontaneous nystagmus was a highly relevant factor for subgroup differences in EQ-5D-5L and DHI, whilst vertical spontaneous nystagmus, subjective visual vertical and sway path were not. EQ-5D-5L decreased significantly with more intense horizontal subjective visual vertical in CV (rho = -0.57) and PV (rho = -0.5) but not EV (rho = -0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PV have the highest functional impairment of all patients with acute vestibular disorders. Vestibular-ocular motor disturbance in the yaw plane has more impact than vestibular-spinal or vestibular-perceptive asymmetry in the roll and pitch plane, suggesting that horizontal visual stability is the most critical for HRQoL.

Walking in orthostatic tremor modulates tremor features and is characterized by impaired gait stability.

Primary orthostatic tremor (OT) is characterized by high-frequency lower-limb muscle contractions and a disabling sense of unsteadiness while standing. Patients consistently report a relief of symptoms when starting to ambulate. Here, we systematically examined and linked tremor and gait characteristics in patients with OT. Tremor and gait features were examined in nine OT patients and controls on a pressure-sensitive treadmill for one minute of walking framed by two one-minute periods of standing. Tremor characteristics were assessed by time-frequency analysis of surface EMG-recordings from four leg muscles. High-frequency tremor during standing (15.29 ± 0.17 Hz) persisted while walking but was consistently reset to higher frequencies (16.34 ± 0.25 Hz; p < 0.001). Tremor intensity was phase-dependently modulated, being predominantly observable during stance phases (p < 0.001). Tremor intensity scaled with the force applied during stepping (p < 0.001) and was linked to specific gait alterations, i.e., wide base walking (p = 0.019) and increased stride-to-stride fluctuations (p = 0.002). OT during walking persists but is reset to higher frequencies, indicating the involvement of supraspinal locomotor centers in the generation of OT rhythm. Tremor intensity is modulated during the gait cycle, pointing at specific pathways mediating the peripheral manifestation of OT. Finally, OT during walking is linked to gait alterations resembling a cerebellar and/or sensory ataxic gait disorder.

Proprioceptive muscle tendon stimulation reduces symptoms in primary orthostatic tremor.

INTRODUCTION: Primary orthostatic tremor (OT) is characterized by high-frequency lower limb muscle contractions and a disabling sense of unsteadiness while standing. To date, therapeutic options for OT are limited. Here, we examined the effects of proprioceptive leg muscle stimulation via muscle tendon vibration (MTV) on tremor and balance control in patients with primary OT. METHODS: Tremor in nine patients with primary OT was examined during four conditions: standing (1), standing with MTV on the bilateral soleus muscles (2), lying (3), and lying with MTV (4). Tremor characteristics were assessed by frequency domain analysis of surface EMG recordings from four leg muscles. Body sway was analyzed using posturographic recordings. RESULTS: During standing, all patients showed a coherent high-frequency tremor in leg muscles and body sway that was absent during lying (p < 0.001). MTV during standing did not reset tremor frequency, but resulted in a decreased tremor intensity (p < 0.001; mean reduction: 32.5 ± 7.1%) and body sway (p = 0.032; mean reduction: 37.2 ± 6.8%). MTV did not affect muscle activity during lying. Four patients further reported a noticeable relief from unsteadiness during stimulation. CONCLUSION: Proprioceptive stimulation did not reset tremor frequency consistent with the presumed central origin of OT. However, continuous MTV influenced the emergence of OT symptoms resulting in reduced tremor intensity, improved posture, and a relief from unsteadiness in half of the examined patients. These findings indicate that MTV either directly interferes with the peripheral manifestation of the central oscillatory pattern or prevents proprioceptive afferent feedback from becoming extensively synchronized at the tremor frequency.

[Vertigo and dizziness in the emergency room]. / Schwindel in der Notaufnahme.

Vertigo and dizziness are among the most common chief complaints in the emergency department. Etiologies can be categorized into three subgroups: neurootological (vestibular), medical (especially cardiovascular, metabolic), and psychiatric disorders. The diagnostic approach in the emergency department is based on a systematic analysis of case history (type, time course of symptoms, modulating factors, associated symptoms), clinical examination of the vestibular, ocular motor, and cerebellar systems (head impulse test, nystagmus, skew deviation, positioning maneuver, test of gait and stance), as well as a basal monitoring (vital signs, 12-lead ECG, blood tests). For differentiation of peripheral and central etiologies in acute vestibular syndrome, the HINTS exam (head impulse test, nystagmus, test of skew) and examination of smooth pursuit and saccades should be applied. Nonselective use of neuroimaging is not indicated due to a low diagnostic yield. Cranial imaging should be done in the following constellations: (1) detection of focal neurological or central ocular motor and vestibular signs on clinical exam, (2) acute abasia with only minor ocular motor signs, (3) presence of various cardiovascular risk factors, (4) headache of unknown quality as an accompanying symptom. Besides the symptomatic therapy of vertigo and dizziness with antiemetics or analgesics, further diagnostic differentiation is urgent to guide proper treatment. Examples are the acute therapy in cerebral ischemia, the execution of positioning maneuvers in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, the use of corticosteroids in acute unilateral vestibulopathy, as well as the readjustment of metabolic homeostasis in medical disorders.