Development of a body dysmorphic disorder screener for DSM-5 (BDDS-5).

Early identification of individuals with Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is essential to direct them to appropriate care and to reduce the chance of developing or maintaining comorbid psychiatric disorders (like an eating disorder (ED)). The present study aimed to develop a simple screener, the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Screener for DSM-5 (BDDS-5), to overcome existing screeners' limitations and test its psychometric properties. The BDDS-5 consists of 12 statements with dichotomous answer options. Specific attention is paid to the readability of the screener for those with lower reading skills. Additional eating disorder screening questions (S section) were added to investigate whether these questions are necessary for detecting potential BDD cases. Finally, the factor structure, internal consistency, and validity of the BDDS-5 were examined within populations with a high risk of screening positive for BDD or ED. Principal axis factor analysis showed that two factors accounted for 63.5% of the variance. The factor analysis was based on polychoric correlation. Based on the BDDS-5, 33 persons (14% of N = 235) were screened as likely BDD cases. Nineteen persons were excluded as potential BDD cases based on the eating disorder related question (question D). Based on the S-section, this turned out to be largely correct for the majority, however, in 8% (n = 4) of the cases BDD was probably missed. The convergent validity appeared to be high (r > 0.80) with three other BDD measures. The BDDS-5 is a valid and widely applicable screener for BDD that may help in the early detection of BDD. The BDDS-5 uses simple wording and is thus suitable for people 8 years and older.

Pharmacokinetics and rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate after single and multiple administration in healthy subjects and patients.

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after rectal administration of a hydrocortisone acetate foam were determined after single and multiple dosing in healthy subjects as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Endogenous hydrocortisone was suppressed by dexamethasone administration. Plasma levels were compared with those observed after intravenous administration of hydrocortisone. Only a very small part of the rectal dose (100 mg) was absorbed; the mean absolute bioavailability was 3.1% in healthy volunteers and 4.5% in patients. There was substantial intersubject variability. Although maximum hydrocortisone levels after single or multiple doses were significantly higher (about 70%) in the patient group, the systemic bioavailability is very low so that the risk of systemic side effects after rectal administration of hydrocortisone acetate foam has to be considered very low.

[Evaluation of a leadership education at the Rigshospitalet. How an evaluation design can support organizational learning]. / Evaluering af lederuddannelse på Rigshospitalet. Hvordan evalueringsdesign kan hjaelpe til at skabe laering i organisationen.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to evaluate a Management & Leadership Education and Training Programme at the hospital before, during, and after implementation, allowing stakeholders to qualify alteration of the Programme as a process by using for instance formative evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Delphi method is used for pre-evaluation of the concept of the Programme. Pre- and post-questionnaires were employed to measure the participants' adaptation of the hospital's "Management Fundamentals" before and after the Programme. RESULTS: The Expert panel stated that the Programme concept was pertinent and applicable. One hundred per cent recommended the Programme to be interdisciplinary. Eighty-two per cent stated that it would probably be difficult to acquire organisational learning. The results of the pre- and post-questionnaires showed that the participants and their superiors found that they adapted the hospital's "Management Fundamentals" better after having followed the Programme. DISCUSSION: With the use of the Delphi method (formative evaluation), the Programme concept could be altered already before implementation. The experts stated that they were not sure that the Programme would support organisational learning. Having this knowledge, it has been possible to work with activities supporting organisational learning already during implementation. In future, the experience with pre- and post-measurements will be used in a concrete way to support the learning environment in the organisation.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of therapeutically clinically equivalent doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, given as Diskus or Turbohaler dry-powder inhalers to healthy subjects.

Direct comparisons of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of inhaled corticosteroids after single and multiple dosing in the same subjects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare thePK/PDproperties of clinically equivalent, single, and multiple doses of dry-powder formulations of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 200 and 500 microg via Diskus) and budesonide (BUD, 400 and 1,000 microg via Turbohaler). Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study consisting of a single dose administered at 8 a.m. on day 1 followed by 4 days of twice-daily dosing at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on days 2 to 5. Serum concentrations of FP and BUD were measured using validated liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry assays. The 24-hour cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) in serum was monitored as the pharmacodynamic surrogate marker. Peak serum concentrations following single and multiple dosing were observed 10 to 30 minutes after inhalation for BUD and 30 to 90 minutes afterinhalation of FP with no influence of dose ordosingregimen. After a single dose of 1000 microg BUD and 500 microg FP the median estimates of terminal half-life and mean residence time were 3.5 and 3.9 hours for BUD and 10.1 and 12.0 hours for FP, respectively. Using previously reported intravenous data, the mean absorption times (MAT) were calculated to be around 2 hours and 7 hours for BUD and FP respectively. On average, the area under the curve (A UC) at steady state (day 5) was up to 30% higher for BUD compared to that over a 12-hour period following the first dose on day 1, whereas A UC estimates were 50% to 80% higherforFP at steady state, indicating accumulation. However, the steady-state Cmax values were seven to eight times and AUC values three to four times higher for BUD than for FP. Comparison of active treatment data with placebo showed that CCS after a single dose was not pronounced for any of the doses/drugs studied. On day 5, both doses of BUD caused statistically significant suppression (CCS of 19% for the 400 microg dose and 36% for the 1,000 microg dose). For FP only the high dose had a statistically significant effect on serum cortisol (CCS of 14% for the 200 microg dose and 27% for the 500 microg dose). Compared to BUD, FP has slower pulmonary absorption and slower elimination kinetics. However, following inhalation of therapeutically equipotent, multiple twice-daily doses in healthy subjects, the systemic effects of FP delivered via Diskus on AUC24 serum cortisol were relatively low and similar to those of BUD delivered via Turbohaler.

A selective HPLC/RIA for the determination of budesonide.

A combined HPLC/RIA procedure is described for the selective determination of budesonide (BUD) in plasma. The assay involves the extraction of plasma or serum samples with ethylacetate, consequent HPLC separation of intact budesonide from cross-reacting metabolites on a C8 reversed phase column, collection of the budesonide containing fraction and determination of budesonide immunoreactivity with the budesonide antiserum. The method was accurate, sensitive (IC50 value of 0.9 ng ml-1) and reproducible (intra- and inter-day less than 15%) with a limit of quantification of 0.133 ng ml-1 (RSD < 25%). The evaluation of a limited number of clinical samples after oral administration of budesonide by both the HPLC/RIA procedure and a direct RIA using the same antiserum differed in average by a factor of 2, with the ratio of HPLC/RIA-RIA results declining as a function of time. Thus, this ratio might be a suitable indicator for probing for the ratio of budesonide and overall metabolites on a semi-quantitative level.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of systemic effects of flunisolide after inhalation.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flunisolide were studied in healthy volunteers after inhalation. In the morning on the day the study began, volunteers inhaled 0.5 mg of flunisolide with and without oral administration of charcoal, or 1 mg, 2 mg, and 3 mg of flunisolide with concomitant administration of charcoal. A placebo group was used to assess the endogenous cortisol, granulocyte, and lymphocyte baseline levels. Flunisolide plasma levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using a tandem mass spectrometer as detector (HPLC/MS/MS). Cortisol plasma levels and differential white blood cell counts were obtained over 12 hours. An integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was applied to link the flunisolide plasma concentrations with the effects on lymphocytes, granulocytes, and cortisol. Maximum concentration levels of 3 to 9 ng/mL of flunisolide were observed after 0.2 to 0.3 hours for all of the investigated doses. The terminal half-life ranged from 1.3 to 1.7 hours. There was no statistical difference between treatments in the presence or absence of orally administered charcoal. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models satisfactorily described the time-courses of the effects on granulocytes, lymphocytes, and cortisol suppression. The resulting E50-values (concentrations to induce 50% of the maximum effect) concurred with the reported values of in vitro receptor binding affinities. The duration of the systemic effects were short because of the short half-life of the drug. Cumulative cortisol suppression increased with dose administration and ranged from 20% to 36%. The PK/PD simulations resulted in a smaller degree of cortisol suppression for the drug administered at 10 PM. The cumulative change from baseline was slightly smaller for the effects on granulocytes and lymphocytes than those on cortisol. This information promotes the comparison with other inhaled glucocorticoids.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cloprednol.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cloprednol after oral administration in doses of 2.5 to 15 mg to healthy volunteers were determined. The half-life of cloprednol ranged from 1.8 h to 2.7 h, the oral clearance (CL/F) was determined to be 15-22 l/h. Since cloprednol shows nonlinear plasma protein binding, the plasma concentrations were converted to their free, unbound concentrations for the PK/PD-analysis. Due to this nonlinearity, the half-life of free, unbound cloprednol was shorter than that of the total drug. For the assessment of pharmacodynamics, differential white blood cell counts were obtained over 24 hours. An integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach using a modified Emax-model was applied to link unbound corticosteroid concentrations to the effect on lymphocytes and granulocytes. The E50 value for unbound cloprednol ranged from 3.6 to 4.7 ng/ml and 1.2 to 4.6 ng/ml for granulocytes and lymphocytes, respectively. The PK/PD model allowed a good prediction of the observed effects and was consistent with reported values for glucocorticoid receptor binding affinities for cloprednol.