Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Arthroscopy ; 31(10): 1886-92, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25980923

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and immunologic effects of intra-articular doses of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients were randomized either to receive an intra-articular injection of PRP (group I, n = 30) or not to receive PRP (group II, n = 27) at the end of hip arthroscopic surgery. To evaluate the clinical outcome and follow-up, we used the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) 3, 6, and 24 months after surgery. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale 24 hours, 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. The radiologic outcome was analyzed using radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Labral integration and joint effusion were evaluated with MRI at 6 months. For statistical analysis, an independent t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used (P < .05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: The visual analog scale score 48 hours after surgery was 3.04 in group I compared with 5.28 in group II (P < .05). At the 3-month follow-up, the mHHS was 91.79 in group I versus 90.97 in group II (P = .65). At the 24-month follow-up, the mHHS was 93.41 in group I (P = .56) versus 92.32 in group II (P = .52). At the 6-month follow-up, MRI showed no effusion in 36.7% of patients in group I versus 21.1% of patients in group II (P = .013). Regarding labral integration, no statistical differences were observed between the groups (P = .76). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, PRP resulted in lower postoperative pain scores at 48 hours and fewer joint effusions at 6 months. These findings suggest that PRP may have a benefit regarding postoperative inflammation; however, the long-term clinical benefit is unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 50(6): 751-3, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21816636

ABSTRACT

The natural history of recurrent uric acid deposition includes joint destruction, as well as tendon weakening and rupture. Simultaneous rupture of the peroneus longus and brevis tendons secondary to tophaceous gout is very rare. In the present report, we describe the case of a 37-year-old man who had a history of recurrent ankle pain and 4 previous episodes of acute gout localized to his ipsilateral first metatarsophalangeal joint. The physical examination revealed the ankle pain to actually be localized to the peroneal tendons immediately distal to the fibular malleolar groove. Magnetic resonance imaging showed longitudinal tears in the peroneus longus and brevis. Surgical exploration and repair of the ruptured tendons revealed the presence of monosodium urate deposition within the substance of the tendons at the rupture sites. The tendons were debrided and repaired using longus to brevis tenodesis. The postoperative course was unremarkable and entailed referral to a rheumatologist for metabolic management. After more than a 1-year period of follow-up, the patient was ambulating without difficulties wearing regular shoe gear.


Subject(s)
Gout/complications , Metatarsophalangeal Joint/pathology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Tendon Injuries/etiology , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Adult , Biopsy, Needle , Debridement/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Gout/diagnosis , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Rupture, Spontaneous/etiology , Rupture, Spontaneous/pathology , Rupture, Spontaneous/surgery , Tendon Injuries/pathology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 34(12): 1292-5, 2009 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19412141

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Normal rotation was evaluated in a group of 40 asymptomatic adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine the normal rotational limits of C1-C2 in adults and define when a rotatory fixation occurs in the limits of normality or in subluxation. The term subluxation should be used only when C1-C2 is rotated beyond normal limits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Concepts about rotatory fixation were established by accepting that it may occur within the limits of normal range of motion. Although nowadays CT is the current image method used to evaluate any case of torticollis, no study has been performed in adult population on what really normal rotation look like in CT scans. METHODS: The study included the measurement of the rotational movement of the neck and a CT scan study of the articular processes of C1-C2 in maximal, left and right, active rotation. A superposition of 6 consecutive slices was carried out, obtaining a linear contour of the axial view of C1-C2. Rotation angle and contact surface loss were measured. RESULTS: The average neck rotation angle was 79 degrees (range: 74 degrees to 81 degrees ). The superposition of the images taken in every rotational direction showed a wide contact loss between the correspondent C1-C2 articular surfaces (42.4%-85.7%; average: 70%). The report of these images, carried out by 3 independent radiologists, concluded that there was a rotatory subluxation in all these cases. CONCLUSION: Our results coincide with our previous published ones conducted in children, and lead us to conclude that a CT scan showing wide-but incomplete-rotational facet displacement is not sufficient to define subluxation. We perceive that there is a risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment (C1-C2 arthrodesis) when evaluating upper cervical spine rotational problems. The concept of both rotatory fixation and subluxation should be revised, and quantifying the rotational angle and contact surface loss between C1-C2 can be very useful.


Subject(s)
Atlanto-Axial Joint/diagnostic imaging , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Atlas/diagnostic imaging , Head Movements/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Arthrography/methods , Atlanto-Axial Joint/anatomy & histology , Atlanto-Axial Joint/physiology , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/anatomy & histology , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/physiology , Cervical Atlas/anatomy & histology , Cervical Atlas/physiology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/pathology , Joint Dislocations/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Rotation/adverse effects , Young Adult , Zygapophyseal Joint/anatomy & histology , Zygapophyseal Joint/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...