Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 34(6)2021 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32960264

ABSTRACT

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission.


Subject(s)
Esophagectomy , Patient Discharge , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Chirurg ; 89(5): 339-346, 2018 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392342

ABSTRACT

Early stage carcinomas of the esophagus are histologically differentiated into adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas and subdivided into mucosal (m1-3) and submucosal (sm1-3) carcinomas depending on the infiltration depth. While the prevalence of lymph node metastases in mucosal carcinomas is very low, the probability of lymph node metastases increases from submucosal infiltration with increasing depth. According to the current German S3 guidelines endoscopic resection is the recommended treatment strategy for mucosal adenocarcinoma without histological risk factors (lymphatic invasion [L1], venous invasion [V1], poorly differentiated [>G2], microscopic residual disease [R1] at the deep resection margin). For superficial submucosal infiltration (sm1) without histological risk factors endoscopic resection can also be carried out, whereby in this case the guidelines make a stronger recommendation for esophagectomy. For squamous cell carcinoma endoscopic resection is indicated for an infiltration depth up to middle layer mucosal carcinoma (m2) without histological risk factors. Outside of these criteria an esophageal resection should always be carried out. The surgical gold standard is a subtotal abdominothoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Alternative procedures are total esophagectomy in proximal esophageal carcinoma and transhiatal extended gastrectomy for carcinoma of the cardia. Limited proximal or distal esophageal resections can be performed in proximal or distal mucosal carcinoma without the possibility of endoscopic resection; however, partial resections are not superior in terms of functional results and are not oncologically equivalent due to limited lymphadenectomy. Minimally invasive procedures show good oncological results and reduce the morbidity of radical esophagectomy. Reduced morbidity might be an argument for surgical resection in borderline cases between endoscopic and surgical resection.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Esophageal Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging
3.
World J Surg ; 42(6): 1811-1818, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of the weekday of surgery in major elective cases of the upper-GI has been discussed controversially. The objective of this study was to assess whether weekday of surgery influences outcome in patients undergoing D2-gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2016 were included. Weekday of surgery was recognized, and subgroups were analyzed regarding clinical and histopathological differences. Survival analysis was performed based on weekday of surgery, and early weekdays (Monday-Tuesday) were compared with late weekdays (Wednesday-Friday). RESULTS: In total, 460 patients, 71% male and 29% female, were included into analysis. The median age was 65 years. Distribution to each weekday was equal and ranged from 86 cases (Wednesday) to 96 cases (Tuesday). The pT, pN and M category and the rate of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment did not show significant differences (p = 0.641; p = 0.337; p = 0.752; p = 0.342, respectively). The subgroups did not differ regarding the number of dissected lymph nodes and rate of R-1/2 resections (p = 0.590; p = 0.241, respectively). Survival analysis showed a median survival of 43 months (95% CI 31-55 months), and there was no single weekday or a combination of weekdays (Mon/Tue vs Wed/Thu/Fri) with a significant favorable or worse outcome (p = 0.863; p = 0.30, respectively). The outcome did not differ regarding mortality within the first 90 days after surgery (p = 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: The present study does not show any evidence for a significant impact of weekday of surgery on short- and long-term outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Gastrectomy/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
Chirurg ; 88(12): 1024-1032, 2017 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29098307

ABSTRACT

The therapeutic approach to patients with oligometastatic gastric cancer and esophageal cancer is currently undergoing a shift towards a more aggressive therapy including surgical resection. In the current German S3 guidelines surgical treatment of metastatic disease is not recommended; however, nowadays interdisciplinary tumor boards have to evaluate such patients increasingly more often. On an individual basis a radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and the metastases is considered and performed in patients who respond well to multimodal chemotherapy concepts. In this review article the currently available data from the literature are discussed and a foundation for individually extended surgical approaches is presented. Together with the currently available results of the FLOT 3 study and the mostly retrospective studies, it seems to be possible to identify patients who would profit from such an aggressive treatment. In the future randomized prospective studies, such as the RENAISSANCE/FLOT 5 study and the GASTRIPEC study will have to evaluate whether an aggressive surgical therapy within multimodal therapy concepts of metastatic gastric and esophageal carcinomas is warranted.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(8): 1572-1580, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28666624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapies are the standard of care for advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (AEG Types I and II). Only three randomised trials have compared preoperative chemotherapy with and without radiation. The results showed a small benefit for combined chemoradiation. In the meantime, newer therapy protocols are available. AIM: In a propensity-score matched study, we analysed patients with locally advanced AEG type I or II, treated with chemotherapy (FLOT-protocol) or chemoradiation (CROSS-protocol), followed by oesophagectomy, in a single high-volume centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 137 patients with advanced (cT3NxcM0) adenocarcinoma received pre-operative therapy; 70% had chemoradiation (CROSS-protocol) and 30% had chemotherapy (FLOT-protocol). After propensity-score matching, 40 patients from the CROSS-group were selected for analysis. Postoperative histopathological response and prognosis were analysed. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable according to the matching criteria age, gender, tumour location, and year of surgery. R0-resection was achieved in 97% of patients in the CROSS-group and 85% of the FLOT-group (p = 0.049). Major response of the primary tumour was evident more often in the CROSS-group (17/40 pts. 43%) versus FLOT-group (11/40 pts. 27%) as well no lymph node metastasis (ypN0 = 68% versus ypN0 = 40%) (p = 0.014). Prognosis were not significantly different between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, only ypN-category was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Compared to FLOT-chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the CROSS-protocol in locally advanced adenocarcinoma AEG types I and II resulted in better response by the primary tumour and less lymph node metastasis but without superior survival.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagectomy , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
6.
Chirurg ; 87(5): 398-405, 2016 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27138270

ABSTRACT

In the current German S3 guidelines surgical treatment is not recommended for metastatic gastric cancer or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction; however, in routine practice the indications can be extended so that there may be occasions in which radical surgical intervention for specific individuals may be appropriate as part of a multimodal therapy with curative intent. This article presents the scientific rationale of such an approach based on the available literature considering modern, multimodal therapy concepts including criteria to be met for radical surgery. Currently only retrospective trials and limited current meta-analysis data are available for justifying surgical treatment for metastatic adenocarcinoma. The recently published initial results of the FLOT-3 study identified a patient subgroup that benefits from a resection even though metastasis has occurred. Whether surgical therapy will become an integral part of the treatment of limited metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagus in the future, has to be demonstrated by large prospective randomized studies, such as the RENAISSANCE/FLOT-5 study.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrectomy , Metastasectomy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate
7.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(9): 1432-47, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26898839

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Outcomes for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer are variable across Europe. The reasons for this variability are not clear. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse clinical pathways to understand differences in service provision for oesophageal and gastric cancer in the countries participating in the EURECCA Upper GI group. METHODS: A questionnaire was devised to assess clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, treatment, pathology, follow-up and service frameworks across Europe for patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer. The questionnaire was issued to experts from 14 countries. The responses were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively and compared. RESULTS: The response rate was (10/14) 71.4%. The approach to diagnosis was similar. Most countries established a diagnosis within 3 weeks of presentation. However, there were different approaches to staging with variable use of endoscopic ultrasound reflecting availability. There has been centralisation of treatments in most countries for oesophageal surgery. The most consistent area was the approach to pathology. There were variations in access to specialist nurse and dietitian support. Although most countries have multidisciplinary teams, their composition and frequency of meetings varied. The two main areas of significant difference were research and audit and overall service provision. Observations on service framework indicated that limited resources restricted many of the services. CONCLUSION: The principle approaches to diagnosis, treatment and pathology were similar. Factors affecting the quality of patient experience were variable. This may reflect availability of resources. Standard pathways of care may enhance both the quality of treatment and patient experience.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Critical Pathways , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Registries , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Denmark , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Europe , France , Gastroenterologists , Germany , Health Policy , Humans , Ireland , Italy , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands , Oncologists , Patient Care Team , Poland , Quality of Health Care , Spain , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Surgeons , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden , Time Factors , United Kingdom
8.
Chirurg ; 85(8): 675-82, 2014 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25052815

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive operative procedures are increasingly being used for treating tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become established as a standard procedure for benign tumors and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) based on current studies, the significance of MIS in the field of gastric cancer is the topic of heated debate. Until now the majority of studies and meta-analyses on gastric cancer have come from Asia and these indicate the advantages of MIS in terms of intraoperative blood loss, minor surgical complications and swifter convalescence although without any benefits in terms of long-term oncological results and quality of life. Unlike in Germany, gastric cancer in Asia with its unchanged high incidence rate, 50 % frequency of early carcinoma and predominantly distal tumor localization is treated at high-volume centres. Due to the proven marginal advantages of MIS over open resection described in the published studies no general recommendation for laparoscopic surgery of gastric cancer can currently be given.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
9.
Chirurg ; 85(3): 203-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24464336

ABSTRACT

Quality of life (QOL) is becoming more and more relevant in clinical research. An increasing number of publications each year confirmed this. The aim of this review is to summarize current data of QOL after surgical procedures. The results are represented by two examples each of malignant and benign diseases. The evaluation of QOL for patients with cancer is only possible with respect to the prognosis. Prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for early gastric cancer are only available from Asia. Data from the USA show that the QOL after gastrectomy was worse regardless of the surgical procedure. During the next 6 months the QOL improved but about one third of the patients had severe impairment during longer follow-up periods. Patients with R1 resection of pancreatic cancer showed only a slightly better prognosis but significantly better QOL compared to patients without resection. The results for the various procedures of cholecystectomy or hernia repair are not always consistent.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Diseases/surgery , Digestive System Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Cholecystectomy/psychology , Digestive System Diseases/mortality , Digestive System Neoplasms/mortality , Disability Evaluation , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy/psychology , Health Services Misuse , Herniorrhaphy/psychology , Humans , Laparoscopy/psychology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
Zentralbl Chir ; 137(2): 180-6, 2012 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22287089

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of well-trained surgeons in Germany. The medical students get their last contact to a surgical discipline in the final year of their medical education. The student's decision for a medical discipline is surely influenced by bad experiences during the last practical training in surgery. The aim of our project was to give the medical students an engaged and structured understanding of surgery with the aid of a logbook. It was tested in a pilot phase and should increase the number of final year students and their interest in surgery in the long-term. METHODS: From 5 / 2009 the structure of the surgical part of the final year was worked over by the Clinics for General, Visceral und Tumour Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Heart and Thoracic Surgery and Trauma Surgery. A logbook was developed which includes the rotation through the 4 different surgical departments, lists the targets of study and the practical exercises in obligatory and optional schedules, defines one patient care per rotation and introduces a mentoring system. The logbook is clearly represented and the required signatures of the senior doctors are minimized. After the surgical term the students filled out a questionnaire and were interviewed about the pros and cons of the logbook. RESULTS: In December 2009 the new logbook was distributed for the first time. Until now 113 final year students have used it. The first evaluation of 45 students showed a positive rating of the clinical organization and structure of the clinic, the list of the learning targets and the practical skills. The implementation of the mentoring system and the required signatures were still incomplete. The final year students wished for more training time for the doctors. The positive response of the final year students results in an increasing number of final year students chosing a career in surgery. CONCLUSION: The new logbook for the surgical part of the final year at the University of Cologne helps the students with the daily routine of the surgical departments, gives a review of the learning targets and emphasizes a good surgical training.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Cooperative Behavior , Documentation/methods , Education, Medical , General Surgery/education , Interdisciplinary Communication , Attitude of Health Personnel , Career Choice , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Germany , Goals , Humans , Mentors , Specialties, Surgical/education , Surgery Department, Hospital
11.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 36(10): 993-6, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20594789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative lymph node staging of pancreatic cancer by CT relies on the premise that malignant lymph nodes are larger than benign nodes. In imaging procedures lymph nodes >1 cm in size are regarded as metastatic nodes. The extend of lymphadenectomy and potential application of neoadjuvant therapy regimens could be dependent on this evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a morphometric study regional lymph nodes from 52 patients with pancreatic cancer were analyzed. The lymph nodes were counted, the largest diameter of each node was measured, and each node was analyzed for metastatic involvement by histopathological examination. The frequency of metastatic involvement was calculated and correlated with lymph node size. RESULTS: A total of 636 lymph nodes were present in the 52 specimens examined for this study (12.2 lymph nodes per patient). Eleven patients had a pN0 status, whereas 41 patients had lymph nodes that were positive for cancer. Five-hundred-twenty (82%) lymph nodes were tumor-free, while 116 (18%) showed metastatic involvement on histopathologic examination. The mean (±SD) diameter of the nonmetastatic nodes was 4.3 mm, whereas infiltrated nodes had a diameter of 5.7 mm (p = 0.001). Seventy-eight (67%) of the infiltrated lymph nodes and 433 (83%) of the nonmetastatic nodes were ≤5 mm in diameter. Of 11 pN0 patients, 5 (45%) patients had at least one lymph node ≥10 mm, in contrast only 12 (29%) out of 41 pN1 patients had one lymph node ≥10 mm. CONCLUSION: Lymph node size is not a reliable parameter for the evaluation of metastatic involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
12.
J Surg Oncol ; 102(2): 135-40, 2010 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20648583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is applied to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, only a major histopathological response will provide a benefit. Recent studies suggest that [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography (FDG-PET) correlates with response and survival in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated the potential of FDG-PET for the assessment of response and prognosis in the multimodality treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Study patients were recruited from a prospective observation trial. Forty two patients with advanced gastric cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequently 40 patients underwent standardized gastrectomy (2 patients with tumor progression had therapy limited to palliative chemotherapy without surgery). Histomorphologic regression was defined as major response when resected specimens contained <10% vital tumor cells. FDG-PET was performed before and 2 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with assessment of the intratumoral FDG-uptake [pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV1); post-treatment SUV (SUV2); percentage change (SUVDelta%)]. RESULTS: Histomorphological tumor regression was confirmed as a prognostic factor (P = 0.039). No significant correlations between SUV1, SUV2, or SUVDelta% and response or prognosis were found. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET seems not to be an imaging system that effectively characterizes major/minor response and survival in patients with gastric cancer following multimodality treatment.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Positron-Emission Tomography , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Gastrectomy , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiopharmaceuticals , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy
13.
Zentralbl Chir ; 134(4): 362-74, 2009 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19688686

ABSTRACT

AIM: This review comments on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in the classical meaning--excluding adenocarcinoma of the -oesophagogastric junction. Algorithms of diagnosis and care with respect to tumour stage are presented. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Besides oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for the accurate diagnosis of T categories and as a selection criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Computed tomography is recommended for preoperative evaluation of tumours > T1, laparoscopy has become an effective stag-ing tool in T3 and T4 tumours avoiding unnecessary laparotomies and improving the detection of small -liver and peritoneal metastases. TREATMENT: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection are indicated in superficial cancer confined to the mucosa with special characteristics (T1 a / no ulcer / G1, 2 / Laurén intestinal / L0 / V0 / tumour size < 2 cm). In all other cases total gastrectomy or distal subtotal gastric resection are indicated, the latter in cases of tumours located in the distal two-thirds of the stomach. Standard lymphadenectomy (LAD) is the D2 LAD without distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is still the preferred type of reconstruction. An additional pouch reconstruction should be considered in -patients with favourable prognosis, this also -applies for the preservation of the duodenal passage by jejunum interposition. Extended organ resections are only indicated in cases where a R0-resection is possible. Hepatic resection for metachronous or synchronous liver metastases is rarely advised since 50 % of patients with liver metastases show concomitant peritoneal dissemination of the disease. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing gastrectomy at a high-volume centre is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a better prognosis, however, clear thresholds for case load cannot be given. Perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy are based on the MAGIC and MacDonald trials. Perioperative chemotherapy should be performed in patients with T3 and T4 tumours with the aim to increase the likelihood of curative R0-resection by downsizing the tumour. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy cannot be recommended since its benefit has so far not been proven in randomised trials. In selected patients with incomplete lymph-node dissection and questionable R0-resection postoperative chemoradiotherapy may be debated.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Biopsy , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastroscopy , Humans , Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care , Perioperative Care , Peritoneal Lavage , Prognosis , Stomach/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
15.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 9(3): 202-7, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19274060

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown an association between the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism and clinical outcome for various solid tumors. In this study, we genotyped 51 patients from an observational trial on cisplatin/5-FU-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer (cT2-4, Nx, M0) and genotyping was correlated with histomorphological tumor regression. The C-allele frequency in esophageal cancer patients was 0.49. Pearson's chi(2)-test showed a significant (P<0.05) association between tumor regression grades and T393C genotypes. Overall, 63% of the patients in the T-allele group (TT+CT) were minor responders with more than 10% residual vital tumor cells in resection specimens, whereas T(-) genotypes (CC) showed a major histopathological response with less than 10% residual vital tumor cells in 80%. The results support the role of the T393C polymorphism as a predictive molecular marker for tumor response to cisplatin/5-FU-based radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Chromogranins , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
16.
Zentralbl Chir ; 134(1): 71-6, 2009 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19242886

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In spite of decreasing incidence rates, gastric carcinomas still belong to the top ten causes of tumour death in Germany. The aim of our study was to analyse the influence of age and comorbidity on the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and seventy-five consecutive patients with gastric cancer resected under curative intentions were included in this study. The comorbidity (Com) was evaluated with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) classifying four different grades of severity (CCI grade 0 = no Com, I = light Com, II = middle Com, III = severe Com). For each decade more than fifty years of age, one point was added for the calculation of the age-adjusted CCI grade. The prognosis was analysed with uni- and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of the 175 patients were males. The median age of all patients was 67 years; 18 % were younger than 50 years, 40 % between 51 and 70 years and 42 % were older than 70 years. The frequencies of comorbidity were as follows: CCI grade 0 = 32 %, I = 46 %, II = 18 % and III = 4 %. The 5-years survival rate (5y-SR) for all patients was 39 %. The univariate analysis of the prognosis showed a significant -influence (p < 0.001) of pT, pN, pM and R categories, but no significant results for age and comorbidity. However, the age-adjusted CCI grades demonstrated significantly different prognoses both in the univariate (p < 0.05) and in the multivariate analyses (p < 0.001) including the UICC stages. Patients between 50 and 70 years -without or with only minor comorbidity had the best prognosis (5y-SR = 55 %). In contrast, young patients without comorbidity had a worse prognosis comparable with that of older patients with comorbidity. CONCLUSION: The combination of high age and comorbidity are -together with the UICC stage the most relevant prognostic factors in patients with resected gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Time Factors
17.
Histol Histopathol ; 23(8): 917-23, 2008 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18498066

ABSTRACT

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) can degrade type IV collagen of extracellular matrices and basal membranes and thus play a key role in the migration of malignant cells. In vivo, MMPs are inhibited by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Since in a previous study we showed that the expression of MMP-2 correlates with clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer, we have now investigated a possible correlation of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 expression with survival in gastric cancer, as well as the possible association of TIMP-2 with clinicopathological parameters. Tissue samples were obtained from 116 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 expression was analysed using immunohistochemical staining and was graded semiquantitatively (score 0 - 3). High epithelial MMP-2 immunoreactivity was significantly associated with tumor stage and poor survival using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank statistical method (log-rank statistics). However, using Cox regression analysis, high epithelial MMP-2 immunoreactivity was not an independent prognostic factor. TIMP-2 showed no association with survival in gastric cancer, but the intensity of TIMP-2 staining in tumor cells correlated significantly with tumor differentiation based on the WHO and Lauren and Ming classifications, as well as with presence of distant metastasis. Our results show that high epithelial MMP-2 expression in gastric cancer is associated with poor survival, although it is not an independent prognostic factor, and that aggressive forms of gastric cancer are associated with low TIMP-2 expression.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Matrix Metalloproteinase 2/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Gastrectomy , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate
18.
Internist (Berl) ; 47(6): 602, 604-6, 608, passim, 2006 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16767475

ABSTRACT

Ulcer surgery today concentrates on the complications of chronic ulcer disease, especially ulcer perforation and endoscopically uncontrollable ulcer bleeding. In this case the laparoscopic or open closure of the gastroduodenal defect or local hemostasis of the bleeding ulcer by laparotomy are the main aims of surgery. Elective operations due to recurrent gastric or duodenal ulcers have become rare. An indication for gastric ulcer resistant to conservative therapy could be persisting suspicion of malignancy whereas in duodenal ulcer gastric outlet obstruction represents a reason for surgery. If these indications are confirmed the classic procedures of gastric resection like Billroth I and Billroth II are performed whereas vagotomy is no longer used. Altogether ulcer surgery has become very safe although it is practiced quite rarely.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/methods , Gastrectomy/trends , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Hemostasis, Surgical/trends , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/trends , Stomach Ulcer/surgery , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends
19.
Histol Histopathol ; 21(5): 503-10, 2006 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16493580

ABSTRACT

Lewis(y) (Le(y)), also designated CD174, represents a carbohydrate blood group antigen which is strongly expressed in neoplastic gastrointestinal tissues. Previous reports indicated an association between Le(y) expression and apoptosis. Therefore, we tried to elucidate its clinicopathological relevance in a series of 160 gastric and 215 colorectal carcinomas by immunohistochemical detection of Le(y) and visualization of apoptotic cells applying the in-situ-end labelling (ISEL) method, followed by semiquantitative scoring of the specimens. In both gastric as well as colorectal carcinomas, between 40 and 50% of the cases were Le(y) reactive. Signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach exhibited a significantly stronger Le(y) expression compared to other tumor types. In colorectal cancers, Le(y) was associated with increased tumor staging, showing the strongest positivity in stage IV. Further correlations with clinicopathological variables or prognosis were not observed. On the other hand, the amount of apoptotic cells was significantly reduced in mucinous adenocarcinomas of the colorectum compared to non-mucinous carcinomas. Scoring of apoptotic cells did not result in any other clinicopathologically relevant correlations. In addition, a significant association between Le(y) antigen expression and apoptosis score could not be established. Therefore, the hypothesis of a functional relationship between these two aspects of gastrointestinal tumor biology is not confirmed by our data.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Apoptosis , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Lewis Blood Group Antigens/analysis , Stomach Neoplasms/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis
20.
Methods Inf Med ; 44(5): 647-54, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16400373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator in patients with gastric carcinoma. However, the methods that have been established for preoperative diagnosis of LNM show insufficient accuracy. METHODS: This study describes the use of the Quality Assured Efficient Engineering of Feedforward Neural Networks with Supervised Learning (QUEEN) technique to attempt optimization of the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma. The results were compared with the Maruyama Diagnostic System (MDS) for preoperative prediction of LNM, established at the National Cancer Center in Tokyo. RESULTS: QUEEN is able to extract predictive variables from a case-based database. The combination of a development method, a special type of neural network and the corresponding encoding yielded an accuracy of 72.73%, which is notably higher than that of the MDS. Our system produced a nearly ten per cent higher sensitivity and around eighteen per cent higher specificity than MDS. CONCLUSION: Our results show that QUEEN is a reasonable method for the development of ANNs. We used the QUEEN system for prediction of LNM in gastric cancer. This system may allow more meaningful preoperative planning by gastric surgeons.


Subject(s)
Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Neural Networks, Computer , Stomach Neoplasms , Germany , Humans , Preoperative Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...