Assessed and discharged - diagnosis, mortality and revisits in short-term emergency department contacts.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) experience an increasing number of patients. High patient flow are incentives for short duration of ED stay which may pose a challenge for patient diagnostics and care implying risk of ED revisits or increased mortality. Four hours are often used as a target time to decide whether to admit or discharge a patient. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the diagnostic pattern, risk of revisits and short-term mortality for ED patients with a length of stay of less than 4 h (visits) with 4-24 h stay (short stay visits). METHODS: Population-based cohort study of patients contacting three EDs in the North Denmark Region during 2014-2016, excluding injured patients. Main diagnoses, number of revisits within 72 h of the initial contact and mortality were outcomes. Data on age, sex, mortality, time of admission and ICD-10 diagnostic chapter were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System and the regional patient administrative system. Descriptive statistics were applied and Kaplan Meier mortality estimates with 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-nine thousand three hundred forty-one short-term ED contacts were included, visits constituted 60%. Non-specific diagnoses (i.e. symptoms and signs and other factors) were the most frequent diagnoses among both visits and short stay visits groups (67% vs 49%). Revisits were more frequent for visits compared to short stay visits (5.8% vs 4.2%). Circulatory diseases displayed the highest 0-48-h mortality within the visits and infections in the short stay visits (11.8% (95%CI: 10.4-13.5) and (3.5% (95%CI: 2.6-4.7)). 30-day mortality were 1.3% (95%CI: 1.2-1.5) for visits and 1.8% (95%CI: 1.7-2.0) for short stay visits. The 30-day mortality of the ED revisits with an initial visit was 1.0% (0.8-1.3), vs 0.7% (0.7-0.8) for no revisits, while 30-day mortality nearly doubled for ED revisits with an initial short stay visit (2.5% (1.9-3.2)). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were within the visit group. Non-specific diagnoses constituted the majority of diagnoses given. Mortality was higher among patients with short stay visits but increased for both groups with ED revisits. This suggest that diagnostics are challenged by short time targets.

Carrier prevalence and risk factors for colonisation of multiresistant bacteria in Danish emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the carrier prevalence and demographic variation of four different multiresistant bacteria (MRB) among acute patients in Danish emergency departments (EDs): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria (CPE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteria (ESBL) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and to analyse the association of MRB carriage to a range of potential risk factors. DESIGN: Multicentre descriptive and analytic cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Eight EDs and four clinical microbiology departments in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Adults visiting the ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Swabs from nose, throat and rectum were collected and analysed for MRSA, ESBL, VRE and CPE. The primary outcome was the prevalence of MRB carriage, and secondary outcomes relation to risk factors among ED patients. RESULTS: We included 5117 patients in the study. Median age was 68 years (54-77) and gender was equally distributed. In total, 266 (5.2%, 95% CI 4.6 to 5.8) were colonised with at least one MRB. No significant difference was observed between male and female patients, between age groups and between university and regional hospitals. Only 5 of the 266 patients with MRB were colonised with two of the included bacteria and none with more than two. CPE prevalence was 0.1% (95% CI 0.0 to 0.2), MRSA prevalence was 0.3% (95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), VRE prevalence was 0.4% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.6) and ESBL prevalence was 4.5% (95% CI 3.9 to 5.1). Risk factors for MRB carriage were previous antibiotic treatment, previous hospital stay, having chronic respiratory infections, use of urinary catheter and travel to Asia, Oceania or Africa. CONCLUSION: Every 20th patient arriving to a Danish ED brings MRB to the hospital. ESBL is the most common MRB in the ED. The main risk factors for MRB carriage are recent antibiotic use and travel abroad. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03352167;Post-results.

Cross sectional study of multiresistant bacteria in Danish emergency departments: prevalence, patterns and risk factors for colonization (AB-RED project).

BACKGROUND: Multiresistant bacteria (MRB) is an increasing problem. Early identification of patients with MRB is mandatory to avoid transmission and to target the antibiotic treatment. The emergency department (ED) is a key player in the early identification of patients who are colonized with MRB. There is currently sparse knowledge of both prevalence and risk factors for colonization with MRSA, ESBL, VRE, CPE and CD in acutely admitted patients in Western European countries including Denmark. To develop evidence-based screening tools for identifying carriers of resistant bacteria among acutely admitted patients, systematic collection of information on risk factors and exposures is required. Since a geographical variation is suspected, it is desirable to include emergency departments across the country. The aim of this project is to provide a comprehensive overview of prevalence and risk factors for MRSA, ESBL, VRE, CPE and CD colonization in patients admitted to Danish ED's. The objectives are to describe the prevalence and demography of resistance, co-infections, to identify risk factors for carrier state and to develop and validate a screening tool for identification of carriers. METHODS: Multicenter descriptive and analytic cross-sectional survey from January-May 2018 of around 10.000 acutely admitted patients > 18 years in 8 EDs for carrier state and risk factors for antibiotic resistant bacteria. Information about the background and possible risk factors for carrier status together with swabs from the nose, throat and rectum is collected and analyzed for MRSA, ESBL, VRE, CPE and CD. The prevalence of the resistant bacteria are calculated at hospital level, regional level and national level and described with relation to residency, sex, age and risk factors. A screening model for identification of carrier stage of resistant bacteria is developed and validated. DISCUSSION: The study will provide the prevalence of colonized patients with resistant bacteria on arrival to the ED and variation in demographic patterns, and will develop a clinical tool to identify certain risk groups. This will enable the clinician to target antibiotic treatments and to reduce the in-hospital spreading of resistant bacteria. This knowledge is important for implementing and evaluating antimicrobial stewardships, screening and infection control strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT03352167 (registration date: 20. November 2017).

HBeAg and not genotypes predicts viral load in patients with hepatitis B in Denmark: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of HBV genotype on viral load in patients with HBV infection, and to investigate the relation to gender, age and country of origin or antibodies against hepatitis Be antigen (anti-HBe). MATERIALS: We investigated 1025 patients with hepatitis B virus infection in a nationwide study in Denmark. RESULTS: Prevalence of genotypes were: 10.5% A, 17.3% B, 20.5% C, 45.7% D, 3.2% E, 0.6% F, 1.1% G and 1% had more than one genotype. Nearly 60% of patients with genotype A were from Africa, 82% and 93% with genotypes B or C were from East Asia, 62% with genotype D came from the Middle East and 91% with genotype E came from Africa. More women had genotypes B (p = 0.006) or C (p < 0.001) while more men had genotypes A (p = 0.015) or D (p < 0.001). Women with genotypes B and D were younger than men (p < 0.001, p = 0.026). Viral load differed in genotype A and D compared with B and C (p < 0.001), and between anti-HBe and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients (median values 5.4 × 10(3) IU/ml and 7.4 × 10(7) IU/ml, respectively, p < 0.001). Viral load depended on the presence of HBeAg (p < 0.001; OR, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.03-0.07) in the adjusted analysis and was not affected by origin (p = 0.65), age (p = 0.12), gender (p = 0.06) or genotype (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: HBeAg status and not HBV genotype influenced viral load in this nationwide study. HBeAg positive patients had median HBV-DNA levels 10,000 times higher than those anti-HBe positive across genotypes.