What works in appraisal meetings for newly graduated doctors? - and what doesn't?

BACKGROUND: In Denmark a national formal advisory program (NFAP) is mandatory in Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME). According to this, an educational advisor is assigned to each doctor in every clinical rotation to guide and oversee the work and learning progress of the trainee. This study explores why newly graduated trainees evaluated the appraisal meetings in the advisory program as either beneficial (successes) or not beneficial (non-successes). METHODS: Inspired by the Success Case Method, a survey was conducted among all 129 doctors employed in their first six-month clinical rotation of postgraduate medical education (PGY1) in the Central Denmark Region. A cluster analysis resulted in a group with eight successes respectively seven non-successes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six successes and five non-successes. RESULTS: In contrast to non-successes, the successes had longer appraisal meetings and their advisor introduced them to purpose and process of meetings including use of the personal learning plan. Successes received feedback on clinical skills, overall global performance and career plans. The successes perceived their advisors as prepared, skilled and motivated and the advisor acted as a contact person. To the successes, the appraisal meetings fostered clarification of and reflections on educational goals, progress and career as well as self-confidence and a sense of security. CONCLUSION: Success with appraisal meetings seemed to depend on advisor's skills and motivation including willingness to prioritize time for this task. The results from this study indicate the importance of faculty development. It also raises the question if all doctors should serve as advisors or if this task should be assigned to the most motivated candidates.

A SWOT analysis of how the youngest doctors perceive the formal Danish educational advisory programme.

INTRODUCTION: A national formal advisory programme (NFAP) was introduced in Denmark in 1998. This study investigates the implementation of the NFAP and identifies areas to improve. METHODS: In March 2017, a survey was conducted among all 129 doctors employed in the first rotation of postgraduate medical education in the Central Denmark Region. A priority chart was created to appoint strengths, weaknesses, op-portunities and threats (SWOT). RESULTS: The response rate was 67%. The questionnaire showed good reliability and discriminant validity. Almost all respondents had completed the recommended appraisal meetings and a personal learning plan, both of which - in contrast to the NFAP's coherence to everyday clinical practice - showed to have much influence on the overall value of the NFAP. Strengths found were that appraisal meetings and learning plans support the development of clinical competencies, the latter identifying learning objectives and how to achieve them. Threats identified included learning plans that were not prepared sufficiently early, were not regularly adjusted and that did not describe when each learning objective is to be achieved, or when, by whom or how assessment will take place. CONCLUSIONS: Appraisal meetings and learning plans seem to be well implemented and to support the development of clinical competencies. Even so, improvements are needed, particularly to ensure an earlier preparation, inclusion of plans for assessment and regular adjustment of the learning plans. FUNDING: The study was funded by the Central Denmark Region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Data collection was approved by the Danish Health Data Authority.

Prevalence and geographical distribution of insulin pump therapy in the Central Denmark Region and its association with metabolic parameters.

AIMS: Insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes encompasses multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Both population-based studies and comparative studies regarding CSII use are sparse. The aim of the current study was to describe the prevalence and distribution of CSII use among adults with type 1 diabetes in the Central Denmark Region and to compare metabolic control in CSII-treated patients to those treated with MDI. METHODS: A database was constructed using the Danish Adult Diabetes Registry in 2014/2015 in combination with an audit of the patients' medical records. RESULTS: 3909 adults with type 1 diabetes patients were included. The proportion of patients treated with CSII differed significantly between the 8 regional hospitals from 12.0% to 31.1%. CSII users had a significantly lower HbA1c compared to MDI treated patients (7.6% (60 mmol/mol) versus 8.0% (64 mmol/mol)) in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for clinically relevant characteristics the difference between CSII and MDI-treated patients was attenuated, but remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The distribution of CSII differed markedly between hospitals and CSII users had better glycemic control, even after adjustment for sex, age, BMI, diabetes duration, smoking, use of lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering medication.

[Appropriate use of hospital days in medical wards]. / Hensigtsmaessig anvendelse af sengedage på medicinske afdelinger.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the incidence of inappropriate use of bed days in Danish medical wards using the European Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP). Several European countries have used the AEP to assess the appropriateness of hospitalisation days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in four Danish medical wards from October 2004 to January 2005. On pre-selected days a doctor and nurse performed case record analyses of all hospitalised patients with registration of the AEP criteria. To assess activities during the entire day, the screening comprised activities from the previous day. RESULTS: Altogether, 738 patients were reviewed. On average, 32.1% of hospitalisation days on the four wards were assessed as inappropriate (range 19.2-39.2%). Lack of alternative facilities (different outpatient services, rehabilitation, home nursing, etc.) and internal waiting time for diagnostic tests were the most common causes of inappropriate bed use. 6.4% of bed days were considered appropriate from a clinical point of view even though no AEP criteria were met. CONCLUSION: In order to reduce the number of inappropriate hospital days, it is necessary to optimise the cooperation with the primary health care sector and ensure immediate availability of diagnostic tests.