Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Arch Environ Occup Health ; 72(2): 87-92, 2017 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26954259

ABSTRACT

Studies have indicated that cleaners are at risk for musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS). In 2001, the Norwegian Labor Inspectorate suggested improvements in cleaners' work environment to reduce MSS. We estimate prevalence of MSS among cleaners in a Norwegian hospital that had implemented improvements to reduce risk of MSS and calculate relative risk of MSS among cleaners compared to a group of office workers. Data were collected from 255 participants. MSS were investigated using the Nordic Questionnaire for Analysis of Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Cleaners reported a significantly higher prevalence of MSS compared to office workers but a lower prevalence compared to similar studies among cleaners in other countries. This may indicate that working conditions in Norway are better than in other countries; further studies are needed to compare MSS and working conditions in different settings.


Subject(s)
Housekeeping, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Body Weights and Measures , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon ; 23(1): 139-142, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27593517

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS/rTMS) are currently used in research and treatments of diseases of the central nervous system, such as recurring depression. Strong electric pulses are used to produce strong pulsed magnetic fields that are directed to the patient's cerebral cortex where the fields induce electric pulses. The pulses may be causing unnecessary exposure of the staff. METHOD: The MagVenture TMS/rTMS system was investigated, without patient presence, through measurements of magnetic field pulses at varying distances from the emitting coil and different power settings (94-127 A/s). RESULTS: Fourteen measurements were done which displayed exposures exceeding the given guidelines up until a distance of 40 cm from the transmitting coil. DISCUSSION: The study shows that the exposure of staff in this type of treatment may exceed the given guidelines for occupational exposure, thus confirming previous findings. This necessitates good routines in information and treatment procedures to avoid this exposure.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Fields , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/instrumentation , Humans , Personnel, Hospital , Radiation Monitoring
3.
Epidemiology ; 26(4): 613-21, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25906367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research about prenatal exposure to electromagnetic fields from cell phones among expectant parents and reproductive outcome is limited. The aim of this article is to investigate the association between pregnancy outcome and parental cell phone exposure in a large prospective study. METHODS: The study was based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study conducted during the decade 1999-2009. In that study, pregnant women were recruited before a routine ultrasound examination during gestational week 15; they answered a questionnaire at that time and again around gestational week 30. The expectant father was invited to answer a questionnaire during gestational week 15 (2001-2009). The forms contained questions regarding cell phone use. The response rate was 38.7% and the cohort comprised 100,730 singleton births. Pregnancy outcomes were obtained by linkage to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. RESULTS: The risk of preeclampsia was slightly lower among women with medium and high cell phone exposure compared with low exposure after adjusting for potential confounders. Fathers with testis exposure when using cell phones had a borderline increased risk of perinatal mortality among offspring and a slightly decreased risk of partner developing preeclampsia during pregnancy compared with no cell phone exposure of head or testis. None of the other pregnancy outcomes was associated with cell phone exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between maternal prenatal or paternal preconceptional cell phone exposure and any of the studied pregnancy outcomes. The only risk estimate suggesting a potential increased risk was not consistent with other findings.


Subject(s)
Abruptio Placentae/epidemiology , Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Maternal Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Paternal Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Perinatal Mortality , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Head , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Sex Ratio , Testis , Young Adult
5.
Int Marit Health ; 64(4): 177-82, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24408137

ABSTRACT

Part of a crew on a Norwegian naval ship was exposed to the radar waves for approximately 7 min from an American destroyer during an incident at sea in August 2012. Information about the exposure was not given by the navy. This is a description of what happened with the crew on board after this event. 14 persons had been on the ship bridge or outside on the deck during the exposure and the rest of the crew had been inside the ship. 27 persons were examined at a hospital 6-8 months after the event, as they had developeda large number of symptoms from different organ systems. They were very worried about all types of possible adverse health effects due to the incident. All were examined by an occupational physician and anophthalmologist, by an interview, clinical examinations and blood tests at the hospital. The interview of the personnel revealed that they had not experienced any major heating during the episode. Their symptoms developed days or weeks after the radar exposure. They had no objective signs of adverse health effects at the examination related to the incident. Long-term health effect from the exposure is highly unlikely. The development of different symptoms after the incident was probably due to the fear of possible health consequences. Better routines for such incidents at sea should be developed to avoid this type of anxiety.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Military Personnel , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Radar , Ships , Accidents, Occupational/psychology , Adult , Fear , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Military Personnel/psychology , Naval Medicine , Norway , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...