Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Eng Phys ; 130: 104210, 2024 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160032

ABSTRACT

In addition to human donor bones, bone models made of synthetic materials are the gold standard substitutes for biomechanical testing of osteosyntheses. However, commercially available artificial bone models are not able to adequately reproduce the mechanical properties of human bone, especially not human osteoporotic bone. To overcome this issue, new types of polyurethane-based synthetic osteoporotic bone models have been developed. Its base materials for the cancellous bone portion and for the cortical portion have already been morphologically and mechanically validated against human bone. Thus, the aim of this study was to combine the two validated base materials for the two bone components to produce femur models with real human geometry, one with a hollow intramedullary canal and one with an intramedullary canal filled with synthetic cancellous bone, and mechanically validate them in comparison to fresh frozen human bone. These custom-made synthetic bone models were fabricated from a computer-tomography data set in a 2-step casting process to achieve not only the real geometry but also realistic cortical thicknesses of the femur. The synthetic bones were tested for axial compression, four-point bending in two planes, and torsion and validated against human osteoporotic bone. The results showed that the mechanical properties of the polyurethane-based synthetic bone models with hollow intramedullary canals are in the range of those of the human osteoporotic femur. Both, the femur models with the hollow and spongy-bone-filled intramedullary canal, showed no substantial differences in bending stiffness and axial compression stiffness compared to human osteoporotic bone. Torsional stiffnesses were slightly higher but within the range of human osteoporotic femurs. Concluding, this study shows that the innovative polyurethane-based femur models are comparable to human bones in terms of bending, axial compression, and torsional stiffness.


Subject(s)
Compressive Strength , Femur , Materials Testing , Osteoporosis , Polyurethanes , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Humans , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Mechanical Tests
2.
J Clin Med ; 12(9)2023 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37176537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral revision surgeries of total hip or knee arthroplasties due to periprosthetic fractures or implant loosening are becoming more frequent in aging populations. Implants in revision arthroplasty usually require long anchoring stems. Depending on the residual distance between two adjacent knee and hip implants, we assume that the risk of interprosthetic fractures increases with a reduction in the interprosthetic distance. The aim of the current study was to investigate the maximum strain within the femoral shaft between two ipsilateral implants tips. METHODS: A simplified physical model consisting of synthetic bone tubes and metallic implant cylinders was constructed and the surface strains were measured using digital image correlation. The strain distribution on the femoral shaft was analyzed in 3-point- and 4-point-bending scenarios. The physical model was transferred to a finite element model to parametrically investigate the effects of the interprosthetic distance and the cortical thickness on maximum strain. Strain patterns for all parametric combinations were compared to the reference strain pattern of the bone without implants. RESULTS: The presence of an implant reduced principal strain values but resulted in distinct strain peaks at the locations of the implant tips. A reduced interprosthetic distance and thinner cortices resulted in strain peaks of up to 180% compared to the reference. At low cortical thicknesses, the strain peaks increased exponentially with a decrease in the interprosthetic distance. An increasing cortical thickness reduced the peak strains at the implant tips. CONCLUSIONS: A minimum interprosthetic distance of 10 mm seems to be crucial to avoid the accumulation of strain peaks caused by ipsilateral implant tips. Interprosthetic fracture management is more important in patients with reduced bone quality.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL