Perioperative myocardial injury in patients receiving cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy: a substudy of the OPTIMISE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy algorithms improve outcomes after high-risk surgery, but there is some concern that this could promote acute myocardial injury. We evaluated the incidence of myocardial injury in a perioperative goal-directed therapy trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery (n=723) were randomly assigned to cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy (intervention group) or usual care as part of the OPTIMISE trial. At four participating sites, 288 patients were enrolled in a biomarker substudy. Serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (TnI) concentration and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration were measured before and at 24 and 72 h after surgery. RESULTS: Median preoperative TnI and NT-ProBNP concentrations were 4.3 ng litre(-1) and 144 pg ml(-1), respectively. After surgery, 67 (46%) patients in the intervention group and 68 (48%) patients receiving usual care had TnI concentrations above the 99th centile upper reference limit (P=0.82). Peak serum TnI concentration was similar in the intervention and usual care groups (median [interquartile range]: 10.0 [5.3-21.5] vs 7.8 [5.0-21.8] ng litre(-1); P=0.85), and no differences were observed in serum TnI concentrations over 72 h (repeated-measures anova, P=0.51). Likewise, there were no differences in peak NT-proBNP concentration between intervention and usual care groups (645 [362-1169] vs 659 [381-1028] pg ml(-1); P=0.86) or in serial NT-proBNP concentrations over 72 h (P=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial injury is common among patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. In this study, the frequency was not affected by cardiac output-guided fluid and low-dose inotropic therapy.

Role of protein kinase C-epsilon (PKCepsilon) in isoflurane-induced cardioprotection.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anaesthetics precondition the heart against infarction, an effect partly mediated by activation of the epsilon isoform of protein kinase C (PKCepsilon). We investigated whether cardioprotection by activation of PKCepsilon depends on the isoflurane concentration. METHODS: Anaesthetized rats underwent 25 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 120 min of reperfusion and were randomly assigned to the following groups (n=10 in each group): isoflurane preconditioning induced by 15 min administration of 0.4 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) (0.4MAC), 1 MAC (1MAC) or 1.75 MAC (1.75MAC) followed by 10 min washout before ischaemia. Each protocol was repeated in the presence of the PKC inhibitor staurosporine (10 microg kg(-1)): 0.4MAC+S, 1MAC+S and 1.75MAC+S. Controls were untreated (CON) and additional hearts received staurosporine without isoflurane (S). In a second set of experiments (n=6 in each group) hearts were excised before the infarct inducing ischaemia, and phosphorylation and translocation of PKCepsilon were determined by western blot analysis. RESULTS: Isoflurane reduced infarct size from a mean of 61(SEM 2)% of the area at risk in controls to 20(1)% (0.4MAC), 26(3)% (1MAC) and 30(1)% (1.75MAC) (all P<0.01 vs CON or S). This protection was partially reversed by administration of staurosporine in the 0.4MAC+S group (30[2]%; P<0.05 vs 0.4MAC) group, but not after administration of 1 MAC or 1.75 MAC isoflurane (26[2]% and 31[2]%, respectively). Thus 0.4MAC increased PKCepsilon phosphorylation, and this effect was blocked by staurosporine. Higher concentrations of isoflurane did not change PKCepsilon phosphorylation. PKCepsilon was translocated to the membrane fraction after administration of 0.4 MAC isoflurane, but not after 1.0 or 1.75 MAC. CONCLUSIONS: Although isoflurane preconditioning resulted in a reduction in infarct size at all concentrations used, the protection was mediated by phosphorylation and translocation of PKCepsilon only at 0.4 MAC.

Effect of lidocaine on ischaemic preconditioning in isolated rat heart.

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine is frequently used as an agent to treat ventricular arrhythmias associated with acute myocardial ischaemia. Lidocaine is a potent blocker not only of sodium channels, but also of ATP-sensitive potassium channels. The opening of these channels is a key mechanism of ischaemic preconditioning. We investigated the hypothesis that lidocaine blocks the cardioprotection induced by ischaemic preconditioning. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts (n=60) were subjected to 30 min of no-flow ischaemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Control hearts (CON) underwent no further intervention. Preconditioned hearts (PC) received two 5-min periods of ischaemia separated by 10 min of reflow before the 30 min ischaemia. In three groups, lidocaine was infused at concentrations of 2, 10 or 20 microg ml(-1) for 5 min before the preconditioning ischaemia. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and infarct size (IS) (triphenyltetrazolium choride staining) were measured as variables of ventricular function and cellular injury, respectively. RESULTS: PC reduced IS from 24.8 (sem 4.1) % to 4.0 (0.7) % of the area at risk (P<0.05). Adding 2 or 10 microg ml(-1) lidocaine had no effect on IS compared with PC alone (3.7 (0.7) %, 6.9 (1.8) %). Adding 20 microg ml(-1) lidocaine increased IS to 14.1 (2.5) % compared with PC (P<0.05). Baseline LVDP was similar in all groups (111.4 (2.1) mm Hg). Compared with CON, PC improved functional recovery (after 60 min of reperfusion; 52.3 (5.9) mm Hg vs 16.0 (4.0) mm Hg, P<0.01). The improved ventricular function was not influenced by addition of 2 or 10 microg ml(-1) lidocaine (47.3 (5.7) mm Hg, not significant; 45.3 (7.3) mm Hg, not significant), but was blocked by the infusion of 20 microg ml(-1) lidocaine (22.5 (8.0) mm Hg, P<0.01 vs PC). CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine blocks the cardioprotection induced by ischaemic preconditioning only at supratherapeutic concentrations.

Haemodynamic changes during halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia in dogs before and after the induction of severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on the failing myocardium are still uncertain. We investigated the effects of different concentrations of sevoflurane, desflurane and halothane in dogs with pacing induced chronic heart failure. METHODS: Global (left ventricular pressure, left ventricular dP/dt, Konigsbergtransducer) and regional myocardial function (systolic segment length shortening, ultrasonic crystals) were measured in chronically instrumented dogs with tachycardia induced severe congestive heart failure. Measurements were performed in healthy dogs and after induction of heart failure in the awake state and during anaesthesia with 0.75, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.75 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of halothane, sevoflurane or desflurane. RESULTS: The anaesthetics reduced dP/dtmax in a dose-dependent manner in healthy dogs (dP/dtmax decreased to 43-53% of awake values at 1.75 MAC). Chronic rapid left ventricular pacing increased heart rate and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and decreased mean arterial pressure, left ventricular systolic pressure and dP/dtmax. The reduction in contractility was similar in the failing myocardium (to 41-50% of awake values at 1.75 MAC). Segmental shortening was reduced during anaesthesia by 50-62% after pacing compared with 22-44% in normal hearts. While there were similar effects of the different anaesthetics on diastolic function in healthy dogs, after induction of heart failure a more pronounced increase of the time constant of isovolumic relaxation and a greater decrease of dP/dtmin was observed with sevoflurane than with desflurane, indicating a stronger depression of diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: While the negative inotropic effects of sevoflurane and desflurane were similar in normal and in the failing myocardium in vivo, desflurane led to a better preservation of diastolic function in the failing myocardium.

[Myocardial protection by volatile anesthetics]. / Myokardprotektion durch Inhalationsanästhetika.

Myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion situations may occur during the perioperative period. The cardioprotective effects of anaesthetics have been known for a long time: volatile anaesthetics reduce the ischaemic cell damage and infarct development. Besides ischaemia, reperfusion itself can also lead to cellular damage, thereby further increasing the ischaemic injury (reperfusion injury). Inhalational anaesthetics offer specific protective effects against reperfusion injury in isolated hearts as well as in rabbit hearts in vivo. This protection does not depend on haemodynamic side-effects of the substances and is even present after protecting the heart against ischaemic damage using a cardioplegic solution. Short periods of ischaemia render the myocardium resistant to subsequent longer periods of ischaemia. This strongest endogenous protective mechanism against the consequences of an ischaemia is known as ischaemic preconditioning. The protective effect can also be produced by stimulation of different types of receptors: the respective agonists produce pharmacological (chemical) preconditioning. The common pathway of the signal transduction cascade of both ischaemic and chemical preconditioning includes the sarcolemnal and/or mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel. Volatile anaesthetics can imitate the protective effects of a short ischaemia, thereby producing chemical preconditioning. This effect depends, at least in part, on anaesthetic-induced opening of ATP-sensitive potassium channels.

Cardioprotection by sevoflurane against reperfusion injury after cardioplegic arrest in the rat is independent of three types of cardioplegia.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane protects the heart against reperfusion injury even after cardioplegic arrest. This protection may depend on the cardioplegic solution. Therefore, we investigated the effect of sevoflurane on myocardial reperfusion injury after cardioplegic arrest with University of Wisconsin solution (UW), Bretschneider's cardioplegia (HTK), and St Thomas' Hospital solution (STH). METHODS: We used an isolated rat heart model where heart rate, ventricular volume, and perfusion pressure were constant. The hearts underwent 30 min of normothermic ischaemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Seven groups were studied (n = 9 each). Three groups received 7 degrees C cold cardioplegic solutions (UW, HTK, STH) during the first 2 min of ischaemia at a flow of 2 ml min-1. In three groups (UW + Sevo, HTK + Sevo, STH + Sevo), sevoflurane was additionally added to the perfusion medium (membrane oxygenator) at 3.8% (1.5 MAC) during the first 15 min of reperfusion after cardioplegic arrest. Nine hearts served as untreated control group (control). We measured left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and infarct size. RESULTS: LVDP was similar in all groups during baseline (130 (SEM 2) mm Hg). HTK and STH improved recovery of LVDP during reperfusion from 5 (1) (control) to 67 (7) (HTK) and 52 (8) mm Hg (STH, both P < 0.05), while UW had no effect on myocardial function (7 (2) mm Hg). In the sevoflurane-treated groups, LVDP at the end of the experiments was not significantly different from the respective group without anaesthetic treatment (UW + Sevo 11 (2); HTK + Sevo 83 (8); STH + Sevo 64 (8) mm Hg; P = ns). Infarct size was reduced in the HTK and STH groups (HTK 20 (4); STH 17 (3)%; P < 0.05) compared with controls (39 (5)%; P < 0.05), but not in the UW group (52 (4)%). Compared with cardioplegia alone, sevoflurane treatment during reperfusion reduced infarct size (UW + Sevo 31 (4); HTK + Sevo 8 (1); STH + Sevo 4 (1)%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude, that the protection against reperfusion injury offered by sevoflurane is independent of the three cardioplegic solutions used.

Lidocaine reduces ischaemic but not reperfusion injury in isolated rat heart.

The local anaesthetic lidocaine protects the myocardium in ischaemia-reperfusion situations. It is not known if this is the consequence of an anti-ischaemic effect or an effect on reperfusion injury. Therefore, we investigated the effect of two concentrations of lidocaine on myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and on reperfusion injury alone. We used an isolated rat heart model where heart rate, ventricular volume and coronary flow were kept constant. Hearts underwent 45 min of low-flow ischaemia followed by 90 min reperfusion. Two groups received lidocaine 1.7 or 17 microg ml(-1) starting 5 min before the onset of reperfusion. In two additional groups, lidocaine infusion started 5 min before low-flow ischaemia. In all groups, lidocaine administration was stopped after 15 min of reperfusion. One group served as an untreated control (n=11 in each group). Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and total creatine kinase release (CKR) were measured. Lidocaine administration during ischaemia and reperfusion led to an improved recovery of LVDP during reperfusion (1.7 microg ml(-1), 54 (SEM 10) mm Hg; 17 microg ml(-1), 71 (9) mm Hg at 30 min of reperfusion; both significantly different from control (21 (4) mm Hg) (P<0.05)) and a reduced CKR (1.7 microg ml(-1), 79 (13) IU; 17 microg ml(-1), 52 (8) IU at 30 min of reperfusion; both significantly different from control (130 (8) IU (P<0.05)). Lidocaine given during early reperfusion only, affected neither LVDP during reperfusion (1.7 microg ml(-1), 19 (6) mm Hg (P=1.0); 17 microg ml(-1), 36 (8) mm Hg (P=0.46)) nor CKR (156 (21) IU (P=0.50) and 106 (14) IU (P=0.57)). We conclude that lidocaine protects the myocardium against ischaemic but not against reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart.

Thiopentone does not block ischemic preconditioning in the isolated rat heart.

PURPOSE: Ischemic preconditioning protects the heart against subsequent prolonged ischemia by opening of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels. Thiopentone blocks K(ATP) channels in isolated cells. Therefore, we investigated the effects of thiopentone on ischemic preconditioning. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts (n=56) were subjected to 30 min of global no-flow ischemia, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Thirteen hearts underwent the protocol without intervention (control, CON) and in 11 hearts (preconditioning, PC), ischemic preconditioning was elicited by two five-minute periods of ischemia. In three additional groups, hearts received 1 (Thio 1, n=11), 10 (Thio 10, n=11) or 100 microg x mL(-1) (Thio 100, n=10) thiopentone for five minutes before preconditioning. Left ventricular (LV) developed pressure and creatine kinase (CK) release were measured as variables of myocardial performance and cellular injury, respectively. RESULTS: Recovery of LV developed pressure was improved by ischemic preconditioning (after 60 min of reperfusion, mean +/- SD: PC, 40 +/- 19% of baseline) compared with the control group (5 +/- 6%, P <0.01) and this improvement of myocardial function was not altered by administration of thiopentone (Thio 1, 37 +/- 15%; Thio 10, 36 +/- 16%; Thio 100, 38 +/- 16%, P=0.87-0.99 vs PC). Total CK release over 60 min of reperfusion was reduced by preconditioning (PC, 202 +/- 82 U x g(-1) dry weight) compared with controls (CON, 383 +/- 147 U x g(-1), P <0.01) and this reduction was not affected by thiopentone (Thio 1, 213 +/- 69 U x g(-1); Thio 10, 211 +/- 98 U x g(-1); Thio 100, 258 +/- 128 U x g(-1), P=0.62-1.0 vs PC). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that thiopentone does not block the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning in an isolated rat heart preparation.

The effect of high-dose pentaerythritol tetranitrate on the development of nitrate tolerance in rabbits.

Experimental studies with therapeutic doses of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) have shown unexpected actions such as a lack of nitrate tolerance and vasoprotective effects in atherosclerosis. We investigated the effect of a 3-week treatment with low- (6 mg kg(-1) day(-1), n=10) and high-dose (100 mg kg(-1) day(-1), n=10) oral PETN given twice daily on the development of nitrate tolerance in rabbits. We measured aortic relaxation in response to acetylcholine, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine and PETN, constriction in response to phenylephrine and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Mean aortic pressure (AOPmean) and heart rate were measured after a single oral dose of PETN (50 mg kg(-1), n=6) and after increasing doses of pentaerythritol dinitrate (PEDN, n=5) and pentaerythritol mononitrate (PEMN, n=5) in anaesthetized rabbits. Oral PETN, even at high dosage, was not associated with nitrate tolerance. None of the aortic ring studies showed a difference in the responses to the vasodilators, while the vasoconstriction to phenylephrine was slightly reduced in both PETN groups. The production of vascular ROS was also not different. Oral PETN reduced AOPmean transiently (-19.3+/-4.4%, P<0.01 vs. controls) and i.v. administration of both PEMN and PEDN reduced AOPmean dose dependently (P<0.05, ANOVA). These results suggest that oral PETN elicits minor nitrate tolerance. This unique feature might be due to the slow onset of vasodilator activity of the predominantly active metabolites PEDN and PEMN and might contribute to the vasoprotective activity of PETN in atherosclerosis.

Late preconditioning is blocked by racemic ketamine, but not by S(+)-ketamine.

UNLABELLED: Racemic ketamine blocks K(ATP) channels in isolated cells and abolishes short-term cardioprotection against prolonged ischemia. We investigated the effects of racemic ketamine and S(+)-ketamine on ischemic late preconditioning (LPC) in the rabbit heart in vivo. A coronary occluder was chronically implanted in 36 rabbits. After recovery, the rabbits divided into four groups (each n = 9). LPC was induced in conscious rabbits by a 5-min coronary occlusion. Twenty-four hours later, the animals were instrumented for measurement of left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP, tip manometer), cardiac output (CO, ultrasonic flowprobe) and myocardial infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining). All rabbits were then subjected to 30-min coronary occlusion and 2 h reperfusion. Controls underwent the ischemia-reperfusion program without LPC. To test whether racemic ketamine or S(+)-ketamine blocks the cardioprotection induced by LPC, the drugs (10 mg/kg) were given 10 min before the 30-min ischemia. Hemodynamic values were not significantly different between groups during the experiments (baseline: LVSP, 94 +/- 3 mm Hg [mean +/- SEM] and CO, 243 +/- 9 mL/min; coronary occlusion: LVSP, 93% +/- 4% of baseline and CO, 84% +/- 4%; after 2 h of reperfusion: LVSP, 85% +/- 4% and CO, 83% +/- 4%). LPC reduced infarct size from 44% +/- 3% of the area at risk in controls to 22% +/- 3% (P = 0.002). Administration of racemic ketamine abolished the cardioprotective effects of LPC (44 +/- 4%, P = 0.002). S(+)-ketamine did not affect the infarct size reduction induced by LPC (26 +/- 6%, P = 0.88). IMPLICATIONS: Racemic ketamine, but not S(+)-ketamine, blocks the cardioprotection induced by ischemic late preconditioning in rabbit hearts in vivo. Thus, the influence of ketamine on ischemic late preconditioning is most likely enantiomer specific, and the use of S(+)-ketamine may be preferable in patients with coronary artery disease.

Additive protective effects of late and early ischaemic preconditioning are mediated by the opening of KATP channels in vivo.

We investigated whether a combination of ischaemic late preconditioning (LPC) and ischaemic early preconditioning (EPC) induces additive myocardial protection in vivo, and the role of ATP-sensitive K (KATP) channels in ischaemic LPC and in LPC + EPC. Sixty rabbits were divided into seven groups. Anaesthetized animals were subjected to 30 min of coronary artery occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion (I/R). Controls (CON, n = 9) were not preconditioned. LPC (n = 10) was induced in conscious rabbits by a 5-min period of myocardial ischaemia 24 h before I/R. The KATP channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, 5 mg/kg) was given 10 min before I/R with (LPC + 5-HD, n = 9) or without LPC (5-HD, n = 8). EPC (n = 8) was induced by a 5-min period of myocardial ischaemia 10 min before I/R. Animals received LPC and EPC without (LPC + EPC, n = 8) or with 5-HD (LPC + EPC + 5-HD, n = 8). LPC reduced infarct size (IS, triphenyltetrazolium staining) from 57 +/- 11% (MW +/- SD, CON) of the area at risk to 31 +/- 19% (LPC, P = 0.004). 5-HD did not affect IS (5-HD: 60 +/- 12%, P = 0.002 versus LPC), but abolished the cardioprotective effects of LPC (LPC + 5-HD: 62 +/- 18%, P = 0.001 versus LPC). EPC reduced IS to 18 +/- 8%. Additional LPC led to a further reduction to 8 +/- 4% (LPC + EPC, n = 8; P = 0.005 versus EPC; P = 0.004 versus LPC). 5-HD abolished this additional cardioprotective effect of LPC + EPC (LPC + EPC + 5-HD, n = 8; 46 +/- 11%, P < or = 0.001 versus LPC + EPC). We conclude that the combination of ischaemic LPC and EPC induces additive cardioprotection. KATP channel opening mediates the cardioprotective effects of ischaemic LPC and LPC + EPC.

Effects of ketamine and its isomers on ischemic preconditioning in the isolated rat heart.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning protects the heart against subsequent ischemia. Opening of the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel is a key mechanism of preconditioning. Ketamine blocks KATP channels of isolated cardiomyocytes. The authors investigated the effects of ketamine and its stereoisomers on preconditioning. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts (n = 80) underwent 30 min of no-flow ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Two groups with eight hearts each underwent the protocol without intervention (control-1 and control-2), and, in eight hearts, preconditioning was elicited by two 5-min periods of ischemia before the 30 min ischemia. In the six treatment groups (each n = 8), ketamine, R(-)- or S(+)-ketamine were administered at concentrations of 2 or 20 microg/ml before preconditioning. Eight hearts received 20 microg/ml R(-)-ketamine before ischemia. Left ventricular (LV) developed pressure and creatine kinase (CK) release during reperfusion were determined as variables of ventricular function and cellular injury. RESULTS: Baseline LV developed pressure was similar in all groups: 104 +/- 28 mmHg (mean +/- SD). Controls showed a poor recovery of LV developed pressure (17 +/- 8% of baseline) and a high CK release (70 +/- 17 IU/g). Ischemic preconditioning improved recovery of LV developed pressure (46 +/- 14%) and reduced CK release (47 +/- 17 IU/g, both P < 0.05 vs. control-1). Ketamine (2 microg/ml) and 2 or 20 microg/ml S(+)-ketamine had no influence on recovery of LV developed pressure compared with preconditioning (47 +/- 18, 43 +/- 8, 49 +/- 36%) and CK release (39 +/- 8, 30 +/- 14, 41 +/- 25 IU/g). After administration of 20 microg/ml ketamine and 2 or 20 microg/ml R(-)-ketamine, the protective effects of preconditioning were abolished (LV developed pressure-recovery, 16 +/- 14, 22 +/- 21, 18 +/- 11%; CK release, 67 +/- 11, 80 +/- 21, 82 +/- 41 IU/g; each P < 0.05 vs. preconditioning). Preischemic treatment with R(-)-ketamine had no effect on CK release (74 +/- 8 vs. 69 +/- 9 IU/g in control-2, P = 0.6) and functional recovery (LV developed pressure 12 +/- 4 vs. 9 +/- 2 mmHg in control-2, P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Ketamine can block the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning. This effect is caused by the R(-)-isomer.

Ketamine, but not S(+)-ketamine, blocks ischemic preconditioning in rabbit hearts in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine blocks KATP channels in isolated cells and abolishes the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning in vitro. The authors investigated the effects of ketamine and S(+)-ketamine on ischemic preconditioning in the rabbit heart in vivo. METHODS: In 46 alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rabbits, left ventricular pressure (tip manometer), cardiac output (ultrasonic flow probe), and myocardial infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining) at the end of the experiment were measured. All rabbits were subjected to 30 min of occlusion of a major coronary artery and 2 h of subsequent reperfusion. The control group underwent the ischemia-reperfusion program without preconditioning. Ischemic preconditioning was elicited by 5-min coronary artery occlusion followed by 10 min of reperfusion before the 30 min period of myocardial ischemia (preconditioning group). To test whether ketamine or S(+)-ketamine blocks the preconditioning-induced cardioprotection, each (10 mg kg(-1)) was administered 5 min before the preconditioning ischemia. To test any effect of ketamine itself, ketamine was also administered without preconditioning at the corresponding time point. RESULTS: Hemodynamic baseline values were not significantly different between groups [left ventricular pressure, 107 +/- 13 mmHg (mean +/- SD); cardiac output, 183 +/- 28 ml/min]. During coronary artery occlusion, left ventricular pressure was reduced to 83 +/- 14% of baseline and cardiac output to 84 +/- 19%. After 2 h of reperfusion, functional recovery was not significantly different among groups (left ventricular pressure, 77 +/- 19%; cardiac output, 86 +/- 18%). Infarct size was reduced from 45 +/- 16% of the area at risk in controls to 24 +/- 17% in the preconditioning group (P = 0.03). The administration of ketamine had no effect on infarct size in animals without preconditioning (48 +/- 18%), but abolished the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning (45 +/- 19%, P = 0.03). S(+)-ketamine did not affect ischemic preconditioning (25 +/- 11%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine, but not S(+)-ketamine blocks the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning in vivo.

One MAC of sevoflurane provides protection against reperfusion injury in the rat heart in vivo.

Volatile anaesthetics protect the heart against reperfusion injury. We investigated whether the cardioprotection induced by sevoflurane against myocardial reperfusion injury was concentration-dependent. Fifty-eight alpha-chloralose anaesthetized rats were subjected to 25 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 90 min of reperfusion. Sevoflurane was administered for the first 15 min of reperfusion at concentrations corresponding to 0.75 (n=11), 1.0 (n=11), 1.5 (n=13), or 2.0 MAC (n=12). Eleven rats served as untreated controls. Left ventricular peak systolic pressure (LVPSP, tipmanometer) and cardiac output (CO, flowprobe) was measured. Infarct size (IS, triphenyltetrazolium staining) was determined as percentage of the area at risk. Baseline LVPSP was 131 (126-135) mm Hg (mean (95% confidence interval)) and CO 33 (31-36) ml min(-1), similar in all groups. During early reperfusion, sevoflurane reduced LVPSP in a concentration-dependent manner to 78 (67-89)% of baseline at 0.75 MAC (not significant vs controls 99 (86-112)%), 71 (62-80)% at 1 MAC (P<0.05), 66 (49-83)% at 1.5 MAC (P<0.05) and 56 (47-65)% at 2 MAC (P<0.05). CO remained constant. While 0.75 MAC of sevoflurane had no effect on IS (34 (27-41)% of the area at risk) compared with controls (38 (31-45)%, P=0.83), 1.0 MAC reduced IS markedly to 23 (17-30)% (P<0.05). Increasing the concentration to 1.5 MAC (23 (17-30)%) and 2 MAC (23 (13-32)%, both P<0.05 vs controls) had no additional protective effect. One MAC sevoflurane protected against myocardial reperfusion injury. Increasing the sevoflurane concentration above 1 MAC resulted in no further protection.

Xenon administration during early reperfusion reduces infarct size after regional ischemia in the rabbit heart in vivo.

The noble gas xenon can be used as an anesthetic gas with many of the properties of the ideal anesthetic. Other volatile anesthetics protect myocardial tissue against reperfusion injury. We investigated the effects of xenon on reperfusion injury after regional myocardial ischemia in the rabbit. Chloralose-anesthetized rabbits were instrumented for measurement of aortic pressure, left ventricular pressure, and cardiac output. Twenty-eight rabbits were subjected to 30 min of occlusion of a major coronary artery followed by 120 min of reperfusion. During the first 15 min of reperfusion, 14 rabbits inhaled 70% xenon/30% oxygen (Xenon), and 14 rabbits inhaled air containing 30% oxygen (Control). Infarct size was determined at the end of the reperfusion period by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Xenon reduced infarct size from 51%+/-3% of the area at risk in controls to 39%+/-5% (P<0.05). Infarct size in relation to the area at risk size was smaller in the xenon-treated animals, indicated by a reduced slope of the regression line relating infarct size to the area at risk size (Control: 0.70+/-0.08, r = 0.93; Xenon: 0.19+/-0.09, r = 0.49, P<0.001). In conclusion, inhaled xenon during early reperfusion reduced infarct size after regional ischemia in the rabbit heart in vivo.

Left stellate ganglion block has only small effects on left ventricular function in awake dogs before and after induction of heart failure.

Left stellate ganglion block (LSGB) results in acute sympathetic denervation of the left ventricular (LV) posterobasal wall. We investigated the effects of LSGB in chronically instrumented awake dogs before and after the induction of pacing-induced congestive heart failure. Twelve dogs were instrumented for measurement of global hemodynamics [LV pressure (LVP)], its first derivative (dP/dt), cardiac output (CO), and regional myocardial function (systolic posterobasal segment length shortening, mean velocity [SLmv]). Before the induction of heart failure (n = 12), LSGB did not affect CO [3.2+/-1.4 (control, mean +/- SD) vs. 3.3+/-1.6 L/min (LSGB, P = 0.45)] and SLmv (11.1+/-4.0 vs. 10.8+/-4.0 mm/s, P = 0.16), but slightly reduced LVP (130+/-12 vs. 125+/-14 mm Hg, P = 0.04), dP/dt(max) (3614+/-755 vs. 3259+/-644 mm Hg/s, P = 0.003) and dP/dt(min) (-3153+/-663 vs. -2970+/-725 mm Hg/s, P = 0.03). During heart failure (n = 8), global hemodynamics [CO (2.8+/-1.2 vs. 2.7+/-1.2 L/min, P = 0.04), LVP (119+/-6 vs. 112+/-9 mm Hg, P = 0.01), dP/dt(max) (1945+/-520 vs. 1824+/-554 mm Hg/s, P = 0.03) and dP/dt(min) (-2402+/-678 vs. -2243+/-683 mm Hg/s, P = 0.04)], as well as regional myocardial function, were significantly different after LSGB [SLmv] (8.0+/-3.8 vs. 6.9+/-3.4 mm/s, P = 0.02)]. In conclusion, even during heart failure, the hemodynamic changes after LSGB are small, confirming its broad margin of safety.