Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 234(7): 891-893, 2017 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28599328

ABSTRACT

There is a growing interest in quality measurement in the healthcare sector. Hospitals in Germany are obligated to participate in measures for external quality assurance and they must establish an internal quality management system. In addition to the legal requirements, measurement of quality is also possible with routine data. Suitable sources are the ICD system or unstandardized information from treatment documentation. The selection of suitable quality indicators is necessary to interpret the data. Complications or achievement of surgical objectives can be suitable quality indicators. Analysis of procedures or the assessment of waiting time are also possible indicators. Our first data concerning waiting time show that with increasing use of an electronic patient guidance system, the waiting time decreased in our outpatient department. Assessment of quality indicators from routine data enables a continuous measurement of quality over a long period. Measures to increase quality can easily be checked. Routine data also provide the possibility to participate in a public reporting of quality indicators.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Hospital Records/standards , Ophthalmology/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Hospital Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , International Classification of Diseases/legislation & jurisprudence , International Classification of Diseases/standards , Ophthalmology/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Indicators, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Waiting Lists
2.
S Afr J Commun Disord ; 59: 16-26, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23409615

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation is an expensive but effective lifelong intervention for individuals with a severe-to-profound hearing loss. The primary aim of this study was to survey the short- and long-term costs of cochlear implantation. Individuals (N=154) using cochlear implants obtained from the University of Stellenbosch-Tygerberg Hospital Cochlear Implant Unit in Cape Town, South Africa were surveyed using a questionnaire and patient record review. The questionnaire used a combination of closed and open-ended questions to gather both quantitative and qualitative information. Costs were categorised as short- and long-term costs. All costs were converted to constant rands (June 2010) using the Consumer Price Index to allow for comparison in real terms over time. In the first 10 years of implantation the average estimated costs incurred by adults totalled R379 626, and by children R455 225. The initial purchase of the implant system was the most substantial cost, followed by upgrading of the processor. Travel and accommodation costs peaked in the first 2 years. On average the participants spent R2 550 per year on batteries and spares. Rehabilitation for children cost an average of R7 200. Insurance costs averaged R4 040 per year, and processor repairs R3 000 each. In addition to the upfront expense of obtaining the cochlear implant system, individuals using a cochlear implant in South Africa should be prepared for the long-term costs of maintenance, accessing the unit, support services and additional costs associated with use. Knowledge of these costs is important to ensure that individuals are successful users of their cochlear implants in the long term.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/economics , Correction of Hearing Impairment/economics , Financing, Personal/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/economics , Income/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , South Africa , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...