Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 90
Filter
1.
J Cutan Pathol ; 51(1): 4-6, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864510
4.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21(10): 1109-1117, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37501398

ABSTRACT

In addition to prevention of surgical site infections after skin surgery, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) aims to prevent the occurrence of other postoperative infectious complications, especially bacterial endocarditis and hematogenous joint prosthesis infections. This article discusses specific indications for the use of PAP. For example, patients who have undergone any type of heart valve replacement, including transcatheter valve replacement or use of prosthetic material to correct the heart valve, or patients who have experienced bacterial endocarditis, require PAP during skin surgery on mucosal membranes or ulcerated tumors. The use of PAP in special situations such as secondary wound healing, septic dermatosurgery or ulcer surgery is also presented and discussed in detail in this paper based on the current scientific literature. This paper represents the second part of the position paper of the Antibiotic Stewardship Working Group of the German Society for Dermatologic Surgery (DGDC) and summarizes evidence-based recommendations for the administration of PAP during skin surgery for special indications and situations. This is particularly important because, as detailed in Part 1 of this position paper, PAP can and usually should be avoided in skin surgery.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Humans , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/prevention & control , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
5.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(6)2023 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36982192

ABSTRACT

Mutations of the oncogenes v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) are the most frequent genetic alterations in melanoma and are mutually exclusive. BRAF V600 mutations are predictive for response to the two BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib and the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor trametinib. However, inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity and the development of acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors have important clinical implications. Here, we investigated and compared the molecular profile of BRAF and NRAS mutated and wildtype melanoma patients' tissue samples using imaging mass spectrometry-based proteomic technology, to identify specific molecular signatures associated with the respective tumors. SCiLSLab and R-statistical software were used to classify peptide profiles using linear discriminant analysis and support vector machine models optimized with two internal cross-validation methods (leave-one-out, k-fold). Classification models showed molecular differences between BRAF and NRAS mutated melanoma, and identification of both was possible with an accuracy of 87-89% and 76-79%, depending on the respective classification method applied. In addition, differential expression of some predictive proteins, such as histones or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase, correlated with BRAF or NRAS mutation status. Overall, these findings provide a new molecular method to classify melanoma patients carrying BRAF and NRAS mutations and help provide a broader view of the molecular characteristics of these patients that may help understand the signaling pathways and interactions involving the altered genes.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Animals , Mice , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/metabolism , Proteomics , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/genetics , Mass Spectrometry , Membrane Proteins/genetics , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics
6.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21(9): 949-956, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892413

ABSTRACT

The aim of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is to prevent the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) or other infectious complications (especially bacterial endocarditis or septic arthritis). PAP is effective in surgeries where overall infection rates are high even without considering patient-related risk factors (such as orthopedic surgery or fracture repair). Surgery on airways, gastrointestinal, genital, or urinary tract is also considered to be associated with a risk of infection and may require PAP. Overall, SSIs in skin surgery are relatively rare and vary between 1% and 11% depending on the localization, complexity of the wound closure and patient cohort. Therefore, the general surgical recommendations regarding PAP only partially reflect the needs of dermatologic surgery. In contrast to the USA, where recommendations on the use of PAP in skin surgery already exist, there are currently no guidelines for the use of PAP specifically designed for dermatologic surgery in Germany. In the absence of an evidence-based recommendation, the use of PAP is guided by the experience of the surgeons and leads to a heterogeneous use of antimicrobial substances. In this work, we summarize the current scientific literature on the use of PAP and make a recommendation depending on procedure- and patient-related risk factors.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
7.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 45(2): 86-89, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669070

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Injection site reactions are defined as skin reactions at the injection site to drugs administered subcutaneously. Pathophysiologically, these reactions are based on different immunological mechanisms. We report the case of a 49-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (first diagnosis in 1994 at the age of 23 years). Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using an insulin pump has been used for many years. The patient presented to the department of dermatology with progressive symptoms in the area of the insulin injection sites on the lower abdomen, accompanied by pain, burning, erythema, tenderness, and the formation of subcutaneous nodules. Previous attempts to use different insulins and to change the injection sites did not improve his symptoms. Furthermore, the symptoms appeared within hours after the insulin pump was attached, so that the injection site has to be changed as soon as every 48 hours. No anaphylactic shock was reported at any time. Multiple histological specimens were obtained from an older lesion on the abdomen as well as from test sites after standard allergological tests (prick and intradermal tests) of various insulins. Histologically, these biopsies showed the image of an extensive deep-reaching small vessel vasculitis with the aspect of an urticarial vasculitis and confirmed the diagnosis of an injection-site reaction that can be characterized as a type III hypersensitivity reaction.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Drug Hypersensitivity , Immune Complex Diseases , Urticaria , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Injection Site Reaction/etiology , Insulin/adverse effects , Urticaria/chemically induced
10.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 20(9): 1187-1199, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36067526

ABSTRACT

The SEC62 gene encodes for a transmembrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Sec62 protein is involved in the post-translational transport of secretory and membrane-bound proteins in eukaryotic cells, regulates intracellular calcium homeostasis through direct interaction with the Sec61 channel and makes a decisive contribution to the cellular compensation of ER stress in the context of recovER-phagy. A significantly increased expression of the SEC62 gene has already been demonstrated in various tumor entities. First approaches of a targeted therapy have been tested for various tumor entities in vitro and in vivo with promising results that motivate further preclinical and clinical studies. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered, in particular with regard to the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed clinical effects, and require further investigation in future studies. The protein also plays a relevant role in dermato-oncology. The overexpression of SEC62 in atypical fibroxanthomas and malignant melanomas has already been demonstrated and a correlation of SEC62 expression with various clinical and pathological features has been observed. Future studies, especially in vivo and clinical, will show whether Sec62 can be established as a prognostic marker in dermato-oncology and whether it can serve as a starting point for targeted therapy.


Subject(s)
Calcium , Endoplasmic Reticulum , Calcium/metabolism , Endoplasmic Reticulum/metabolism , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Protein Transport/physiology
12.
Hautarzt ; 73(2): 138-145, 2022 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939128

ABSTRACT

Excisions and biopsies are firmly anchored in everyday dermatology. The biopsy, excision or diagnostic-therapeutic confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of neoplasms or inflammatory diseases is decisive for the dermatopathological diagnosis of tissue samples. Dermatopathology, however, is not a magic box into which a tissue sample can be placed without comment or information and receive-within 24 h at the latest-a complete, high-quality diagnosis. The present article describes problems, hurdles, and challenges in everyday dermatopathology that occur on the way to the microscope, even before the actual dermatopathological diagnosis takes place.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Skin Diseases , Biopsy , Humans , Skin Diseases/diagnosis
15.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 19 Suppl 5: 25-53, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Germany, skin diseases are mainly treated in the 115 dermatological hospitals. METHODS: Health care and health economic analysis of dermatological inpatient care and prediction of future care needs based on primary and secondary data. RESULTS: Outpatient and inpatient care for dermatologic treatment indications is predominantly provided by dermatology specialists. Inpatient treatment was provided for 833,491 cases in 2018, corresponding to 4.21 % of all inpatient cases (19,808,687). Most common treatment cases were: epithelial skin cancer (total 87,386, of which dermatology clinics 52,608), followed by melanoma (23,917/17,774), psoriasis (19,291/13,352), erysipelas (73,337/11,260), other dermatitis (12,671/10,842), atopic dermatitis (AD) (11,421/9,734), and herpes zoster (26,249/9,652). With an average length of stay of 5.69 days, dermatology hospitals were in the bottom third. The proportion of inpatient indications cared for in dermatology hospitals was highest for prurigo (95.2 %), pemphigus (94.9 %), parapsoriasis (94.6 %), pemphigoid (90.3 %), eczema other than AD (85.6 %), and AD (85.2 %). While the total number of inpatient treatment cases in Germany has increased by an average of 17.5 % between 2000 and 2018, this is the case for 26.6 % of skin diseases and over 150 % for individual ones. The projection of current to future inpatient care suggests a continued high demand for inpatient care by dermatology hospitals. CONCLUSION: Inpatient dermatological care will continue to be an indispensable component of qualified, socially necessary care in Germany.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Prurigo , Skin Diseases , Delivery of Health Care , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Inpatients , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/therapy
16.
Eur J Cancer ; 156: 202-216, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have compared the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models for automated skin cancer classification to human experts, thus setting the cornerstone for a successful translation of AI-based tools into clinicopathological practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to systematically analyse the current state of research on reader studies involving melanoma and to assess their potential clinical relevance by evaluating three main aspects: test set characteristics (holdout/out-of-distribution data set, composition), test setting (experimental/clinical, inclusion of metadata) and representativeness of participating clinicians. METHODS: PubMed, Medline and ScienceDirect were screened for peer-reviewed studies published between 2017 and 2021 and dealing with AI-based skin cancer classification involving melanoma. The search terms skin cancer classification, deep learning, convolutional neural network (CNN), melanoma (detection), digital biomarkers, histopathology and whole slide imaging were combined. Based on the search results, only studies that considered direct comparison of AI results with clinicians and had a diagnostic classification as their main objective were included. RESULTS: A total of 19 reader studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 CNN-based approaches addressed the classification of dermoscopic images; 6 concentrated on the classification of clinical images, whereas 2 dermatopathological studies utilised digitised histopathological whole slide images. CONCLUSIONS: All 19 included studies demonstrated superior or at least equivalent performance of CNN-based classifiers compared with clinicians. However, almost all studies were conducted in highly artificial settings based exclusively on single images of the suspicious lesions. Moreover, test sets mainly consisted of holdout images and did not represent the full range of patient populations and melanoma subtypes encountered in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Dermatologists , Dermoscopy , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Melanoma/pathology , Microscopy , Neural Networks, Computer , Pathologists , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Automation , Biopsy , Clinical Competence , Deep Learning , Humans , Melanoma/classification , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Skin Neoplasms/classification
17.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(13)2021 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34206844

ABSTRACT

The discrimination of malignant melanoma from benign nevi may be difficult in some cases. For this reason, immunohistological and molecular techniques are included in the differential diagnostic toolbox for these lesions. These methods are time consuming when applied subsequently and, in some cases, no definitive diagnosis can be made. We studied both lesions by imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) in a large cohort (n = 203) to determine a different proteomic profile between cutaneous melanomas and melanocytic nevi. Sample preparation and instrument setting were tested to obtain optimal results in term of data quality and reproducibility. A proteomic signature was found by linear discriminant analysis to discern malignant melanoma from benign nevus (n = 113) with an overall accuracy of >98%. The prediction model was tested in an independent set (n = 90) reaching an overall accuracy of 93% in classifying melanoma from nevi. Statistical analysis of the IMS data revealed mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) peaks which varied significantly (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve > 0.7) between the two tissue types. To our knowledge, this is the largest IMS study of cutaneous melanoma and nevi performed up to now. Our findings clearly show that discrimination of melanocytic nevi from melanoma is possible by IMS.

20.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(7)2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33915997

ABSTRACT

SEC62 oncogene located at chromosomal region 3q26 encodes for a transmembrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and is expressed at high levels in numerous human malignancies. SEC62 overexpression has been associated with worse prognosis and high risk for lymphatic and distant metastases in head and neck cancer, cervical cancer, hepatocellular cancer, and lung cancer. However, its role in the development and tumor biology of melanocytic lesions has not been investigated so far. An immunohistochemical study including 209 patients with melanocytic lesions (malignant melanoma (MM), n = 93; melanoma metastases (MET), n = 28; Spitz nevi (SN), n = 29; blue nevi (BN), n = 21; congenital nevi (CN), n = 38) was conducted and SEC62 expression was correlated with clinical data including patient survival and histopathological characteristics. SN showed the highest SEC62 expression levels followed by MET, MM, CN, and BN. High SEC62 expression correlated with a shorter overall and progression-free survival in MM patients. Additionally, high Sec62 levels correlated significantly with higher tumor size (T stage), the presence of tumor ulceration, and the presence of lymph node as well as distant metastases. Strikingly, SEC62 expression showed a strong correlation with Clark level. Taken together, these data demonstrate that SEC62 is a promising prognostic marker in MM and has the potential to predict biological behavior and clinical aggressiveness of melanocytic lesions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...