Similar effect of co-administration of methotrexate and folic acid for the treatment of arthritis compared to separate administration.

OBJECTIVES: MTX is the recommended first-line treatment for RA associated with folic acid (FA) to reduce side effects related to MTX. Here, we proposed to test a co-administration of MTX with FA in the rat adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) on efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: AIA was induced in female Lewis rats and treated with MTX in three groups. The first group of rats received only MTX (n = 13), whereas the second received MTX and FA on the same day (n = 14). The third group received FA one day after MTX (n = 14). Arthritic index (AI), ankle circumference (AC), ankle microcomputed tomography, and blood tests assessed arthritis severity and MTX tolerance. RESULTS: AI and AC were similar in MTX groups at various time points. Bone erosion and bone loss parameters were similar in all groups. MTX-PG1 was found at similar levels in various MTX groups and correlated negatively with arthritis severity. Finally, haematology and metabolic parameters were found at a similar level in MTX groups. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of MTX with FA on the same day did not reduce efficacy compared with FA application one day after MTX. Thus, co-administration of MTX and FA could be more convenient and improve compliance in patients.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Combined Analysis of European Biologics Databases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) is more effective for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and/or improves TNFi drug survival compared to TNFi monotherapy. METHODS: Five PsA biologics cohorts were investigated between 2000 and 2015: the ATTRA registry (Czech Republic); the Swiss Clinical Quality Management PsA registry; the Hellenic Registry of Biologics Therapies (Greece); the University of Bari PsA biologics database (Italy); and the Bath PsA cohort (UK). Drug persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and equality of survival using log-rank tests. Comparative effectiveness was investigated using logistic regression with propensity scores. Separate analyses were performed on (1) the combined Italian/Swiss cohorts for change in rate of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28); and (2) the combined Italian, Swiss, and Bath cohorts for change in rate of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: In total, 2294 patients were eligible for the drug survival analysis. In the Swiss (P = 0.002), Greek (P = 0.021), and Bath (P = 0.014) databases, patients starting TNFi in combination with methotrexate had longer drug survival compared to monotherapy, while in Italy the monotherapy group persisted longer (P = 0.030). In eligible patients from the combined Italian/Swiss dataset (n = 1056), there was no significant difference between treatment arms in rate of change of DAS28. Similarly, when also including the Bath cohort (n = 1205), there was no significant difference in rate of change of HAQ. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of a TNFi with a csDMARD does not appear to affect improvement of disease activity or HAQ versus TNFi monotherapy, but it may improve TNFi drug survival.

Impaired response to treatment with tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors in smokers with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of smoking on the response to treatment with a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a real-life cohort. METHODS: Patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Cohort were included in this study. The potential association between smoking status and differential response to TNFi in terms of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was analysed using multiple adjusted longitudinal mixed effect models. Binary response rates at 1 year were assessed with multiple adjusted logistic analyses. RESULTS: A first TNFi was initiated in 698 patients with axSpA with available smoking status and a baseline or follow-up BASDAI assessment, of which 490 (70%) had complete covariate data. In comparison to non-smokers, current smokers demonstrated significantly smaller reductions in BASDAI and ASDAS scores upon treatment with TNFi (0.75 BASDAI units and 0.69 ASDAS units less, p=0.005 and 0.001, respectively) for patients with elevated baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level. This effect was numerically smaller in patients with normal CRP. The odds for reaching a 50% improvement in BASDAI response or the ASAS criteria for 40% improvement after 1 year were significantly lower in current smokers than in non-smokers (0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, p=0.03 and 0.43, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.76, p=0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Current smoking is associated with an impaired response to TNFi in axSpA.

Effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of subcutaneous methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective analysis of real-world data from the St. Gallen cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Recently updated recommendations by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) show MTX as an important part of the first-line strategy in patients with active RA. The study presented here aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) MTX among patients with RA. METHODS: Patients with RA who were naïve at baseline to both conventional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/EULAR 2010 criteria, and had one or more follow-up visits were selected through sequential chart review for analysis of retrospective data. Patients received SC MTX at varying doses (10-25mg per week). The primary end point was a change in the Disease Activity Score including 28 joints (DAS28); secondary end points included time to employment of the first biologic agent and cumulative MTX doses. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients were in follow-up for a mean of 1.8 years after initiating SC MTX treatment. During this time, 37 (53%) remained on SC MTX without any biologics (MTX-only) and 33 (47%) required the addition of a biologic therapy (MTX-biol). Biologic therapy was required after a mean ± SD of 387 ± 404 days. Mean weekly MTX doses were 17.4mg for patients in the MTX-only group and 19.1mg for patients in the MTX-biol group. Mean baseline DAS28 were similar for patients in the MTX-biol and MTX-only groups (4.9 and 4.7, respectively). Both low disease activity state (LDAS) and remission were achieved by slightly fewer patients in the MTX-biol than MTX-only groups (LDAS, 78.8% vs 81.1%; remission, 69.7% vs 75.7%). Over the full course of the study period, SC MTX was discontinued in 32 patients (46%). Among those who discontinued, the most common reasons were gastrointestinal discomfort (n = 7), lack of efficacy (n = 7), and disease remission (n = 3). Severe infections occurred in 3 patients in the MTX-biol group and 3 patients in the MTX-only group. CONCLUSIONS: SC MTX is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with RA. SC MTX resulted in high rates of remission and LDAS in early disease, over prolonged periods of time, it, therefore, may extend the time before patients require initiation of biologic therapy.

Efficient boosting of the antiviral T cell response in B cell-depleted patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases following influenza vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: Booster vaccination against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus was recommended for rheumatologic patients under immunosuppressive therapy during the 2009/2010 H1N1 pandemic. In this study we assessed whether B cell depletion with rituximab influences of the antiviral immune response in 2009 H1N1 influenza virus-vaccinated patients. METHODS: Influenza virus-specific immune responses were analysed after the first and a booster vaccination with pandemrixTM in sixteen consecutive rituximab-treated patients with different rheumatic autoimmune disorders. Antibody titers were determined by a haemagglutination-inhibition assay and virus-specific T cell responses were evaluated by a flow cytometry-based intracellular cytokine-secretion assay. Patients showing clinical symptoms of influenza infection were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Two out of seven patients with low (<10%) and four out of nine with normal (>10%) B cells developed significant antibody responses after the first vaccination. Booster vaccination led to an antibody response in one additional patient. After the first vaccination, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were significantly lower in patients with low B cells than in those with normal B cells. Of importance, the booster vaccination stimulated the antiviral T cell response only in patients with low B cells. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a significant effect of booster vaccinations against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus on the humoral immune response in B cell-depleted patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, enhanced antiviral T cell responses in patients with low B cells indicate that T cells, maybe, compensate for the impaired humoral immunity in these patients.

Detection of low level cryoglobulins by flow cytometry.

Several patients with cryoglobulin (CG) associated symptoms are seronegative for CG and other potentially causative biomarkers. We analyzed whether it is possible to detect cryoprecipitates by flow cytometry and whether the sensitivity of their demonstration can be increased as compared to visual inspection. Sera from 91 patients with suspected CG associated symptoms and 33 healthy controls were examined for the presence of CG by conventional visual testing and by flow cytometry for small diffracting particles. For calibration purposes we tested lipid micelle dilutions (positive controls) by both methods. The minimum concentrations of lipid micelles to be detected by visual inspection and flow cytometry were 128.5 and 2.0 pg ml(-1), respectively. Among the 91 patients and 33 controls, only 1 patient serum was positive for CG by conventional testing. This sample was also positive on flow cytometry. In the serum of a patient known to be positive for CG, laser diffracting particles were quantified by flow cytometry after keeping serum at 4°C for 3 days. Of the 91 patients, 14 additional samples displayed cold precipitates which redissolved after rewarming during flow cytometry. All 15 (1 + 14) patients positive for CG on flow cytometry suffered from symptoms usually associated with CG. Some precipitates were labeled with anti IgG and IgM antibodies confirming that the particles detected by flow cytometry contained immunoglobulins. No small diffracting particles were detected in the sera of the 33 healthy controls. Flow cytometry is equally specific but much more sensitive in the detection of CG than visual inspection.