ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In recognition of the ongoing discussion on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, the Board of Directors of the European Association for Palliative Care commissioned this white paper from the palliative care perspective. AIM: This white paper aims to provide an ethical framework for palliative care professionals on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It also aims to provide an overview on the available evidence as well as a discourse of ethical principles related to these issues. DESIGN: Starting from a 2003 European Association for Palliative Care position paper, 21 statements were drafted and submitted to a five-round Delphi process PARTICIPANTS: A panel with 17 experts commented on the paper in round 1. Board members of national palliative care or hospice associations that are collective members of European Association for Palliative Care were invited to an online survey in rounds 2 and 3. The expert panel and the European Association for Palliative Care board members participated in rounds 4 and 5. This final version was adopted as an official position paper of the European Association for Palliative Care in April 2015. RESULTS: Main topics of the white paper are concepts and definitions of palliative care, its values and philosophy, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, key issues on the patient and the organizational level. The consensus process confirmed the 2003 European Association for Palliative Care white paper and its position on the relationship between palliative care and euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. CONCLUSION: The European Association for Palliative Care feels that it is important to contribute to informed public debates on these issues. Complete consensus seems to be unachievable due to incompatible normative frameworks that clash.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Euthanasia/ethics , Palliative Care/ethics , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Advisory Committees , Attitude of Health Personnel , Delphi Technique , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical errors have recently been recognized as a relevant concern in public health, and increasing research efforts have been made to find ways of improving patient safety. In palliative care, however, studies on errors are scant. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to gather pilot data concerning experiences and attitudes of palliative care professionals on this topic. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire, which consists of questions on relevance, estimated frequency, kinds and severity of errors, their causes and consequences, and the way palliative care professionals handle them. The questionnaire was sent to all specialist palliative care institutions in the region of Bavaria, Germany (n=168; inhabitants 12.5 million) reaching a response rate of 42% (n=70). RESULTS: Errors in palliative care were regarded as a highly relevant problem (median 8 on a 10-point numeric rating scale). Most respondents experienced a moderate frequency of errors (1-10 per 100 patients). Errors in communication were estimated to be more common than those in symptom control. The causes most often mentioned were deficits in communication or organization. Moral and psychological problems for the person committing the error were seen as more frequent than consequences for the patient. Ninety percent of respondents declared that they disclose errors to the harmed patient. For 78% of the professionals, the issue was not a part of their professional training. CONCLUSION: Professionals acknowledge errors-in particular errors in communication-to be a common and relevant problem in palliative care, one that has, however, been neglected in training and research.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Palliative Care , Adult , Female , Germany , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
In this case study we report on a patient with advanced myxofibrosarcoma and lung metastases, suffering from severe dyspnoea. Symptoms were not manageable by means of standard palliative care, which made palliative sedation therapy necessary in order to alleviate dyspnoea. On the basis of this case study, indications, drugs, therapy monitoring and ethical aspects of palliative sedation therapy are discussed.
Subject(s)
Conscious Sedation , Dyspnea/psychology , Dyspnea/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Myxosarcoma/psychology , Myxosarcoma/secondary , Palliative Care/psychology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/psychology , Aged , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Myxosarcoma/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/psychology , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Referral and Consultation , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to explore aspects of the health care situation of outpatient palliative patients in Germany as well as effort and workload of care from the viewpoint of involved care givers. Additionally the future development with regard to the cooperation with other health care providers is assessed. METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was developed and sent to 188 outpatient care givers, all members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine, in January 2009. All data was analyzed via SPSS version 16. RESULTS: 69 questionnaires were included into statistical analyses. Care givers estimate the effort of care of palliative patients as very high. 28 per cent of working time is spent on administration. Responders consider general and quantitative workload to be the highest. Most care givers assess the SAPV-directive of the Federal Joint Committee as well as the future health care situation of palliative patients and cooperation with other health care providers as good. DISCUSSION: Further studies should focus on the collection of longitudinal patient data for a more comprehensive insight.
