Late adverse effects after soft X-ray therapy of cutaneous malignancies: pruritus, burning, epiphora and insufficient occlusion of the mouth.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus, burning, epiphora and insufficient occlusion of the mouth have been less extensively studied than cosmetic changes in irradiated fields. OBJECTIVES: How frequent are these late adverse effects? Do they usually occur permanently? Are they influenced by treatment and tumour parameters, sex and age of the patients? METHODS: Patients were interviewed at least once later than 90 days after soft X-ray therapy. RESULTS: Pruritus has been reported in 18.5% of the interviews, burning in 7.7%, epiphora in 36.2% and insufficient occlusion of the mouth in 11.5%. Patients were usually not permanently troubled and irritated by these symptoms: pruritus more than once per week was reported in every interview for 0.6% of the fields, burning for 0.2%, epiphora for 6.4% and insufficient occlusion for 0%. Irritation by these symptoms has been stated in every interview for 5.1% of fields around the eye and for 1.4% of fields at other sites. Late pruritus, burning and epiphora were less frequently reported after irradiation with lower total doses, lower time-dose-fractionation factor (TDF) and by men. Patients older than 70 years of age experienced pruritus and burning less frequently. The largest diameter of the irradiated field influenced pruritus and the half value depth of the X-rays influenced burning and epiphora. CONCLUSIONS: Late pruritus, burning, epiphora and insufficient occlusion of the mouth do not considerably reduce the value of soft X-ray therapy because these adverse effects usually are not experienced permanently. Total dose and TDF should not be chosen higher than necessary.

Late side-effects with cosmetic relevance following soft X-ray therapy of cutaneous neoplasias.

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic changes are to be expected after radiotherapy for skin tumours. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to answer the questions: How frequent are cosmetic changes after soft X-ray therapy? Do treatment parameters, tumour thickness, localization and size of the irradiated field have a major influence? Were patients irritated by the visual appearance of the irradiated field? METHODS: In total, 2474 examinations of 1149 irradiated fields were performed. RESULTS: Hypopigmentation was found in 64.7% of examinations more than 90 days after therapy, teleangiectases in 43.1%, erythema in 24.8%, and hyperpigmentation in 16.8%. The frequency of hypopigmentation, teleangiectases and hyperpigmentation increased with time from X-ray exposure; more than 4 years after therapy hypopigmentation was diagnosed in 91.8% and teleangiectases in 82.2% of examinations. Total dose, the time-dose-fractionation factor (TDF), field size and dose per fraction were significantly related to the frequency of cosmetic changes. Incidence rates of cosmetic changes differed by less than 15% if different treatment conditions were compared: thicker vs. thinner tumours, larger vs. smaller fields, higher vs. lower total doses, doses per fraction, and TDF. Frequencies of hypopigmentation, teleangiectases, erythema and hyperpigmentation differed by more than 15% between some localizations on the head. Women reported irritation by the visual appearance of the irradiated field in 12.6% of 1116 interviews, and men in 4.4% of 1284 interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic changes after soft X-ray therapy are relatively frequent. Treatment parameters, tumour thickness and field size have only a minor influence. Few patients, but more women than men, were irritated by the visual appearance of the irradiated field.