ABSTRACT
Background The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India saw a sudden upsurge of critically ill patients getting admitted to the ICU. The guidance for respiratory support was unclear in the early phase. But later reports showed lower mortality with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) than with intubation. The aim of this study was to assess the end result of initial methods of ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Methodology Patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 were categorized as group 1 (IPPV-intubated within 24 hrs of admission), group 2 (NIV -NIV only), group 3 (NIV+ IPPV-intubated after 24 hrs), and group 4 (NRBM - Non-Rebreathing Mask only). All causes in the hospital or 30-day mortality, length of stay in ICU, and incidence of pneumothorax were compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was done to determine the odds of mortality. Results The overall mortality rate among patients admitted to tertiary care centers was 15% and the rate among patients in ICU was 54.07%. Patients in group 1 and group 3 had significantly high mortality rates of 90.47% and 93.75%, respectively, as compared to 51.28% in group 2 patients. The odds of mortality were high in group 3 (OR 29.57, 95% CI 4.51 and 193.52) and group 1 (OR 8.01, 95% CI 1.35 and 47.48). Conclusion In a resource-limited setting, the use of NIV is associated with higher survival in COVID-19 patients. The prognosis of patients who are intubated early or after a trial of NIV is the same with increased odds of mortality.
ABSTRACT
Background Early prediction of hypotension helps to decide appropriate prophylactic measures and, hence, safe anaesthesia for mothers and improved neonatal outcomes. Perfusion index (PI) measured from a standard pulse oximeter has shown positive results in the prediction of hypotension. This study aims to determine if PI can equally predict hypotension in parturients after administration of spinal anaesthesia at different time points. Methods Parturients posted for elective caesarean section belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiology II (ASA II) were divided into two groups based on baseline PI as group A <3.5 and group B ≥3.5. Fifty-six parturients were enrolled in the study. PI and blood pressure were monitored at baseline, every two minutes for 12 minutes and every five minutes until the end of the surgery, after administration of spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg. Incidence of hypotension was compared between groups at all time points of observation. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was determined to check the correlation between baseline PI and the number of episodes of hypotension. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the ideal cut-off at different time points. Results Baseline PI significantly correlated with the number of episodes of hypotension (r-0.525). The overall incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in parturients with baseline PI ≥3.5 (79.16%) as compared to those with PI <3.5 (33.33%). The incidence of hypotension at sixth, 10th and 37th minutes post-spinal anaesthesia administration was significantly higher in the group with PI ≥3.5. The sensitivity and specificity for the 3.5 cut-off of PI were 85.7% and 60%, respectively, at the 6th and 10th minute after spinal administration. A higher cut-off of 3.9 increases the specificity to 69% without much change in the sensitivity. Conclusion Parturients with PI >3.9 at baseline have a higher risk of hypotension in the initial 10-12 minutes following spinal anaesthesia during caesarean delivery.
