ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess adherence to the recommendations for the diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients with Decompensated Heart Failure issued by the European Society of Cardiology in 2021 at a Coronary Care Unit at a fourth-level hospital in the city of Bogotá. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted, including hospitalized patients in the Coronary Care Unit at Hospital San José in Bogotá, with a primary diagnosis of Decompensated Heart Failure, from September 2021 to January 2023. Patient data were collected from medical records. Adherence to the Decompensated Heart Failure guidelines was described in the study. Results: High adherence was observed for laboratory tests and medication prescriptions recommended by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. However, there was low adherence to the request for thyroid function tests, troponin, and iron studies. The cause of heart failure and decompensation was adequately recorded. The most common cause of decompensation was acute coronary syndrome. Regarding the hemodynamic profile on admission, the majority presented as Stevenson B. Pharmacological adherence to Class I recommendations showed high compliance in prescribing beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors. However, lower adherence was observed for Sodium-glucose co-transporter two inhibitors and Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Conclusions: Variable adherence rates were recorded, emphasizing satisfactory compliance with class I recommendations for certain medications and laboratory tests. It is necessary to improve adherence in the request for paraclinicals, especially in thyroid function tests and ferrokinetic profiles.
ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: la aféresis plasmática, ampliamente utilizada, con indicaciones renales y no renales, así mismo con diferentes niveles de evidencia descritos por la Sociedad Americana de Aféresis, siendo un tratamiento antiguo y muy utilizado, en la literatura se disponen de escasos estudios que comparen el uso de las diferentes soluciones de reposición (cristaloides, coloides, plasma, albúmina) en cuanto a su respuesta clínica y paraclínica, específicamente en resultados de la función renal. Objetivo: describir la experiencia de pacientes llevados a aféresis plasmática en una institución de cuarto nivel, haciendo énfasis en los desenlaces de función renal y seguridad, con una nueva estrategia de solución de reposición con voluven. Métodos: estudio tipo serie de casos, se incluyeron pacientes tratados con plasmaféresis, quienes ingresaron entre enero 2012 y abril 2019 al servicio de nefrología del Hospital San José. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo. Resultados: se realizaron 608 sesiones de plasmaféresis. La indicación más frecuente el rechazo humoral agudo en el trasplante renal. Al final del periodo de tratamiento, los pacientes en plasma e hidroxietil almidón (hydroxyethyl starch, HES por sus siglas en inglés) presentaron similar proporción de hipocalcemia y trombocitopenia, las pruebas de función renal se conservan normales después del tratamiento. Conclusión: los efectos secundarios de la aféresis terapéutica como los trastornos hematológicos (alteración de los factores de coagulación, trombocitopenia o anemia), además de hipocalcemia, o posibles alteraciones de la función renal comparados entre los diferentes líquidos de reemplazo plasmático, albúmina o HES, en nuestro trabajo demostró que las alteraciones no son mayores y la función renal se mantiene conservada durante la terapia, además, se encontró que el uso de HES no generó lesión renal aguda, al contrario, se observa estabilidad de la función renal, por lo tanto se debe considerar su uso, siendo un producto de bajo costo, con excelentes resultados clínicos. (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2028).
Abstract Introduction: while plasma apheresis is a longstanding, widely used treatment for renal and non-renal indications, with different levels of evidence described by the American Society for Apheresis, there are few studies in the literature comparing the use of different replacement solutions (crystalloids, colloids, plasma, albumin) with regard to their clinical and paraclinical response, specifically in kidney function results. Objective: to describe the experience of patients undergoing plasma apheresis in a quaternary care institution with a new replacement solution strategy using Voluven, emphasizing kidney function and safety outcomes. Methods: a case series which included patients treated with plasmapheresis who were admitted to the nephrology service at Hospital San José between January 2012 and April 2019. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: 608 plasmapheresis sessions were performed. The most common indication was acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation. At the end of treatment, patients receiving plasma and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) had a similar proportion of hypocalcemia and thrombocytopenia. Kidney function tests remained normal after treatment. Conclusion: our study's comparison between the different plasma replacement fluids (albumin or HES) with regard to the side effects of therapeutic apheresis such as blood disorders (altered coagulation factors, thrombocytopenia or anemia), hypocalcemia or possible kidney function disorders, showed no major disorders and preserved kidney function during treatment. In addition, we found that HES did not cause acute kidney injury; on the contrary, kidney function was stable. Therefore, its use should be considered as a low-cost product with excellent clinical results. (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2028).
