Exhausting care: On the collateral realities of caring in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.

We explore care as a site of multiplicity and tension. Working with the qualitative interview accounts of nineteen health care workers in Colombia, we trace a narrative of 'exhausting care' in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic. Accounts relate exhausting care to working without break in response to extraordinary demand, heightened contagion concern, the pressures of caring in the face of anticipated death, and efforts to carry on caring in the face of constraint. We bring together the work of John Law (2010, 2011) on 'collateral realities' with Lauren Berlant's (2011) thesis of 'cruel optimism' to explore care as a site of practice in which the promise of the good can also become materialised as harm, given structural conditions. Through the reflexive narrative of 'carrying on' in the face of being 'worn down' by care, a narrative which runs through health care worker accounts, we draw attention to the collateral realities of exhausting care as personal and political, at once a practice of endurance and extraction. We argue that the exhausting care that relates to the extraordinariness of the Covid-19 pandemic also resides in the ordinariness, and slower violence, of the everyday. The cruel optimism of care is a relation in which the labour of care reproduces a harmful situation.

A description of the risk factors related to fragility fractures in adults and their associated costs

Objective: to identify bone fragility risk factors associated with increased total fracture care costs at a clinic in Medellín, Colombia. Design: an observational study with retrospective and prospective measurements taken from the medical charts of patients admitted for fractures and followed until discharge. Frame of reference: Hospital Alma Mater de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. Participants: four hundred fifty-two patients diagnosed with fragility fractures on admission. Main measurements: the prevalence of bone fragility risk factors, a description of the total care cost by risk factor and an estimate of the association between the risk factors and total costs. Results: Diabetes (24.3%) and active or passive smoking (21%) were the most prevalent fragility risk factors. Hip fractures were the most frequent and costly (36%, Md: COP 7,882,579). Fracture care was more costly for active or passive smokers (Md: COP 7,484,185), and those 75 years old or older (Md: COP7,057,678). According to the significant adjusted estimates (p<0.05), the median cost for active or passive smokers exceeds that of nonsmokers by more than COP 2,300,000, and every year of age increases the median cost by more than COP 90,000. Conclusions: this study emphasized that bone fragility is a public health problem. Factors like active or passive smoking and age were found to increase fragility fracture care costs, implying more complications and need for services. This adds to the evidence for strengthening monitoring programs to reduce the morbidity, mortality and direct costs of this disease in Colombia. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2351).

Objetivo: identificar factores de riesgo de fragilidad ósea asociados al aumento de costos totales de atención de fracturas en una clínica de Medellín, Colombia. Diseño: estudio observacional con medidas retrospectivas y prospectivas tomadas de la historia clínica de pacientes atendidos por fractura y seguidos hasta su egreso. Marco de referencia: Hospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. Participantes: cuatrocientos cincuenta y dos pacientes diagnosticados con fracturas por fragi lidad al ingreso. Mediciones principales: prevalencia de factores de riesgo de fragilidad ósea, descripción de costos totales de atención según factores de riesgo, y estimación de asociaciones entre factores de riesgo y costos totales. Resultados: diabetes (24.3%) y tabaquismo activo o pasivo (21%) fueron los factores de riesgo de fragilidad más prevalentes. Las fracturas de cadera fueron las más frecuentes y costosas (36%, Md: COP7 882 579). La atención de fracturas fue más costosa para pacientes fumadores activos o pasivos (Md: COP7 484 185), y de 75 años o más (Md: COP7 057 678). Según las estimaciones ajustadas significativas (p<0.05), los fumadores activos o pasivos tienen una mediana de costos de más de COP2 300 000 mayor que la de no fumadores, y cada año de edad incrementa la mediana de costos más de COP90 000. Conclusiones: este estudio enfatizó que la fragilidad ósea es un problema de salud pública. Se identificó que factores como fumar activa o pasivamente, y la edad aumenta los costos de atención de fractura por fragilidad implicando mayores complicaciones y necesidad de servicios. Esto añade a la evidencia para fortalecer los programas de vigilancia que reduzcan la morbimortalidad y costos directos de esta enfermedad en Colombia. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2351).