Could retrograde reperfusion combined with washout technique broaden the applicability of marginal grafts in liver transplantation? Intra-operative and short-term outcomes of a prospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: many revascularization techniques were designed to reduce the imbalance of ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study's objective is to evaluate retrograde reperfusion (RR) compared to sequential anterograde reperfusion (AR), with and without the washout technique (WO). METHOD: this prospective cohort study collected data from 94 deceased donor orthotopic liver transplants and divided it into three groups: RR with WO (RR+WO), AP with WO (AR+WO), and AP without WO (AR). This study did not assign the reperfusion technique to the participants. The primary outcome considered the early graft dysfunction, and secondary outcomes included post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS), post-reperfusion lactate, surgery fluid balance, and vasoactive drug dose during the surgery. RESULTS: 87 patients were submitted to the final analysis-29 in the RR+WO group, 27 in the AR+WO group, and 31 in the AR group. Marginal grafts prevalence was not significantly different between the groups (34% vs. 22% vs. 23%; p=0.49) and early graft dysfunction occurred at the same rate (24% vs. 26% vs. 19%; p=0.72). RR+WO reduced serum post-reperfusion lactate (p=0.034) and the incidence of significant PRS (17% vs. 33% vs. 55%; p=0.051), but norepinephrine dosing >0.5mcg/kg/min were not different during the surgery (20,7% vs. 29,6% vs. 35,5%, p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: primary outcome was not significantly different between the groups; however, intraoperative hemodynamic management was safer using the RR+WO technique. We theorized that the RR+WO technique could reduce the incidence of PRS and benefit marginal graft survival following diseased donor orthotopic liver transplantation.

Understanding the Elevated Lethality of COVID-19 in Liver Transplant Recipients: Does Immunosuppression Management Matter? Results from a Brazilian Multicentric Historical Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Infections by SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant recipients (LT) patients are of particular concern, notably due to perceived added risks related to immunosuppression and comorbidity burden. Current literature on this topic often relies on small, non-standardized, and geographically limited studies. This manuscript describes COVID-19 presentations and causes for elevated mortality in a large cohort of LT recipients. METHODS: This study was designed as a multicentric historical cohort, including LT recipient patients with COVID-19 in 25 study centers, with the primary endpoint being COVID-related death. We also collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data regarding presentation and disease progression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-four cases were included. The study population was predominantly male and White and had a median age of 60 years. The median time from transplantation was 2.6 years (IQR 1-6). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (189, 80.8%). Patient age (P = .04), dyspnea (P < .001), intensive care unit admission (P < .001), and mechanical ventilation (P < .001) were associated with increased mortality. Modifications of immunosuppressive therapy (P < .001), specifically the suspension of tacrolimus, maintained significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Attention to risk factors and the individualization of patient care, especially regarding immunosuppression management, is crucial for delivering more precise interventions to these individuals.

Could retrograde reperfusion combined with washout technique broaden the applicability of marginal grafts in liver transplantation? Intra-operative and short-term outcomes of a prospective cohort / A reperfusão retrógrada combinada com a lavagem do enxerto pode ampliar a aceitabilidade de fígados limítrofes no transplante hepático? Resultados intraoperatórios e precoces de uma coorte prospectiva

ABSTRACT Introduction: many revascularization techniques were designed to reduce the imbalance of ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study's objective is to evaluate retrograde reperfusion (RR) compared to sequential anterograde reperfusion (AR), with and without the washout technique (WO). Method: this prospective cohort study collected data from 94 deceased donor orthotopic liver transplants and divided it into three groups: RR with WO (RR+WO), AP with WO (AR+WO), and AP without WO (AR). This study did not assign the reperfusion technique to the participants. The primary outcome considered the early graft dysfunction, and secondary outcomes included post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS), post-reperfusion lactate, surgery fluid balance, and vasoactive drug dose during the surgery. Results: 87 patients were submitted to the final analysis-29 in the RR+WO group, 27 in the AR+WO group, and 31 in the AR group. Marginal grafts prevalence was not significantly different between the groups (34% vs. 22% vs. 23%; p=0.49) and early graft dysfunction occurred at the same rate (24% vs. 26% vs. 19%; p=0.72). RR+WO reduced serum post-reperfusion lactate (p=0.034) and the incidence of significant PRS (17% vs. 33% vs. 55%; p=0.051), but norepinephrine dosing >0.5mcg/kg/min were not different during the surgery (20,7% vs. 29,6% vs. 35,5%, p=0.45). Conclusions: primary outcome was not significantly different between the groups; however, intraoperative hemodynamic management was safer using the RR+WO technique. We theorized that the RR+WO technique could reduce the incidence of PRS and benefit marginal graft survival following diseased donor orthotopic liver transplantation.

RESUMO Introdução: várias técnicas de reperfusão foram desenvolvidas a fim de reduzir o dano da lesão induzida por isquemia-reperfusão. Este estudo objetivou avaliar a reperfusão retrograda (RR) comparado com a reperfusão anterógrada (AR), com e sem a realização da técnica de lavagem do enxerto (WO). Métodos: coorte prospectiva com 94 transplantes ortotópicos de fígado de doador falecido divididos em três grupos: RR com WO (RR+WO), reperfusão anterógrada com WO (AR+WO), e AR sem WO (AR). Este estudo não designou a técnica de reperfusão entre os participantes. O desfecho primário considerou a disfunção precoce do enxerto, e os desfechos secundários incluíram a síndrome pós-reperfusão (SPR), lactato pós-reperfusão, balanço hídrico operatório, e uso de drogas vasoativas durante o ato peratório. Resultados: 87 pacientes foram submetidos para consolidação dos dados-29 no RR+WO, 27 no AR+WO, e 31 no AR. A prevalência de enxertos maginais não diferiu entre os grupos (34% vs 22% vs 23%; p=0,49). Disfunção precoce do enxerto ocorreu em uma proporção similar (24% vs 26% vs 19%; p=0,72). RR+WO reduziu o lactato sérico pós-reperfusão (p=0,034) e a incidência de SPR severa (17% vs 33% vs 55%; p=0,051), entretanto a infusão de noradrenalina >0,5mcg/kg/min não foi diferente durante a cirurgia (20,7% vs 29,6% vs 35,5%, p=0,45). Conclusões: o desfecho primário não diferiu significativamente entre os grupos; entretanto, o manejo hemodinâmico intra-operatório foi mais seguro no grupo RR+WO. Nós teorizamos que a técnica RR+WO pode reduzir a SPR e beneficiar enxertos marginais no transplante de fígado.

Embolizaçao percutanea seletiva no tratamento da hemorragia arterial hepatica / Selective percutaneous embolization for treatment of arterial hepatic hemorrhage

Sao apresentados quatro pacientes portadores de hemorragia arterial hepatica maciça tratados pela embolizaçao percutanea de ramos da arteria hepatica. Em dois pacientes, o sangramento ocorria para a arvore biliar (hemobilia) e nos outros dois, para a cavidade abdominal em consequencia de rotura de hepatocarcinoma. Nos quatro pacientes houve controle imediato do sangramento, seguido de plena recuperaçao hemodinamica. Os autores discutem as indicaçoes, tecnicas, riscos e vantagens do metodo, considerando-o procedimento de excelencia em casos de hemorragia arterial do figado

Uso e abuso dos exames pré-operatórios / Use and abuse of preoperative examinations

No sentido de avaliaçäo da necessidade dos exames complementares, considerados de rotina, para a cirurgia eletiva, foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo de 694 pacientes, que se submeteram aos diferentes tipos de intervençöes cirúrgicas, excluindo-se as cardiotorácicas, no Hospital das Clínicas da UFPE, em 1983. Procederam-se, separadamente, as análises do estudo clínico - história e exame físico - e dos exames complementares, inclusive com o parecer cardiológico e a radiografia de tórax. Os dados coletados foram cotejados com a morbidade e letalidade cirúrgicas. Os prontuários revelaram que o exame clínico adequado foi realizado em 33,28% dos pacientes, enquanto que 100% submeteram-se aos exames complementares, registrando-se a média de 9,6 exames pré-operatórios por paciente. Os exames complementares revelaram poucas alteraçöes capazes de agravar o risco cirúrgico e que näo pudessem ser detectados, através de estudo clínico adequado. Conclue-se que a retomada da anamnese e do exame físico, como principais instrumentos de avaliaçäo pré-operatória, devolveria ao exame laboratorial a sua verdadeira condiçäo de exame complementar, proporcionando a diminuiçäo do custo hospitalar e social sem prejudicar os resultados cirúrgicos