[Lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors for T1 esophageal cancer].

Objective: To evaluate the lymph node metastasis (LNM) pattern and related prognostic factors for T1 esophageal cancer. Methods: Clinical data of 143 cases of pT1 esophageal cancer patients (120 male and 23 female patients with median age of 60 years) who underwent esophagectomy and lymph node resection during January 2011 and July 2016 at the Department of Esophageal Cancer of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were reviewed, including 50 cases of T1a patients and 93 cases of T1b patients. The LNM pattern was analyzed and the prognostic factors related to LNM were assessed by χ2 test and Logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 143 patients, 25 patients had LNM. The LNM rates were 17.5% for pT1 tumors, 16.0%(8/50) for pT1a tumors, and 22.6%(21/93) for T1b tumors. Of 25 patients with LNM, one patient had cervical metastasis, 15 patients with thoracic metastasis, and 17 patients with abdominal metastasis. The relatively highest LNM sites were laryngeal recurrent nerve (8 cases), left gastric artery (8 cases), right and left cardiac (6 cases) and thoracic paraesophageal (5 cases). Logistic regression analysis showed that the depth of tumor infiltration (OR=4.641, 95%CI: 1.279 to 16.836, P=0.020), tumor size (OR=5.301, 95%CI: 1.779 to 15.792, P=0.003), tumor location (OR=3.238, 95% CI: 1.248 to 8.401, P=0.016), and tumor differentiation (OR=5.301, 95%CI: 1.719 to 16.347, P=0.004) were independent prognostic factors related to LNM for T1 esophageal cancer. Tumor size (OR=4.117, 95% CI: 1.228 to 13.806, P=0.022) was an independent risk factor related to thoracic LNM, and the vessel invasion (OR=6.058, 95% CI: 1.228 to 29.876, P=0.027) and tumor location (OR=8.113, 95% CI: 1.785-36.872, P=0.007) were independent prognostic factors related to abdominal LNM. Conclusions: T1 esophageal cancer has a relatively high LNM rate, and the depth of tumor infiltration, tumor size, tumor location and tumor differentiation are correlated with LNM. The LNM risk and extent must be considered comprehensively in decision-making of a better surgical treatment and lymph node resection strategy.

[Comparison of the effect of lymph node dissection performed by Ivor-Lewis or left-sided thoracic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type â ¡ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].

Objective: To compare the extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative complications between Ivor-Lewis procedure and left sided thoracotomy in patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods: The clinical data of 101 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ EG who received surgical treatment between January 2014 and September 2015 in the Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into Ivor-Lewis group (IL, n=38) and left- sided thoracotomy group (LT, n=63) according to the operation mode. The number and extent of dissected lymph nodes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The surgical blood loss, length of postoperative stay, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, respiratory failure and complications of incision of the two groups showed no significant differences (P>0.05 of all). The operation time of IL group was 200 min, significantly longer than the LT group (120 min, P<0.05). The number of resected lymph nodes in the IL and LT groups were (20±9) and (13±7), respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Significantly more thoracic lymph nodes (7±5) were harvested in the IL group than in the LT group (2±2, P<0.001), and the number of resected abdominal lymph nodes in the IL and LT groups were (13±8) and (11±7), with a non-significant difference (P=0.157). As regarding the lymph node dissection rate, the IL approach was obviously better than the LT approach in the following lymph node stations: superior mediastinal nodes, subcarinal nodes, left hilar nodes, right hilar nodes, middle thoracic paraesophageal nodes, lower thoracic paraesophageal nodes, lymph nodes along the common hepatic artery, and lymph nodes along the splenic artery(P<0.05 for all). Conclusions: The Ivor-Lewis procedure achieves better thoracic and abdominal lymph node dissection, and does not cause more postoperative complications than the left-sided thoracotomy in patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG. However, these findings need to be confirmed by large-scale randomized clinical trial in the future.