ABSTRACT
The current study aimed to find neural evidence that trait anxiety interferes with one's shifting function processing efficiency. Twenty-five high trait-anxiety (HTA) and twenty-five low trait-anxiety (LTA) participants were instructed to complete a cue-based Stroop task-switching assessment of shifting function. No group difference in behavioral performance was shown, though event-related potential (ERP) results in the cue-locked period showed that only the LTA group had a general switch benefit in contingent negative variation (CNV) amplitude, indicating the LTA group exerted less task preparation effort. In the subsequent target-locked period, compared to the LTA group, the local switch cost of target-P3 was higher in the HTA group in incompatible trials, suggesting inefficient attentional resource allocation in the HTA group in incompatible trials. These ERP findings indicated that the HTA group ultimately achieved comparable behavioral performance with the LTA group at the expense of using more compensatory strategies at the neural level.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Evoked Potentials , Anxiety Disorders , Attention , Humans , Stroop TestABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) has become one of the most prevalent joint diseases worldwide, leading to a growing burden of pain and disability as populations age. Although there is consistent evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation and high-intensity prehabilitation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the clinical outcomes of hospital-based prehabilitation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a hospital-based prehabilitation program on knee score (KS), function score (FS), and length of stay (LOS) among patients with knee OA after TKA. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University among patients with primary knee OA. Seventy-two postopearative patients who did not undergo the prehabilitation program were included as the control group, while 68 postoperative patients who underwent the prehabilitation program were assigned to the intervention group. All patients went through the same care after TKA. The KS, FS, and pain levels were measured 5 days before surgery, immediately preceding surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. LOS for each patient was recorded. RESULTS: The new prehabilitation training program significantly improved the KS over time in the intervention group. However, no significant between-group difference was identified in the change of FS. The prehabilitation program also provided shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital-based prehabilitation program leads to improved recovery, as indicated by higher KS postoperatively, which may result in improved clinical outcomes of TKA.
