Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Future Oncol ; 17(8): 943-954, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289432

ABSTRACT

Aim: The CAVIDIOR study evaluated quality of life (QoL) in patients with breakthrough cancer pain receiving palliative radiation therapy in radiation oncology departments (RODs) in Spain. Patients & methods: Prospective observational study at 11 Spanish RODs (July 2016-November 2017). QoL was assessed using Short Form Health Survey 12. Secondary end points were sleep quality, caregiver burden and patient/perception of improvement. Results: QoL improved according to the Short Form Health Survey 12 mental component. Sleep quality and caregivers' burden improved significantly. Conclusion: Breakthrough cancer pain is highly prevalent and can be substantially reduced with appropriate diagnosis and management in RODs. Along with the QoL questionnaire, sleep quality and caregiver burden provide a more comprehensive assessment of overall health status in patients receiving radiation therapy in RODs. Clinical trial registration: NCT02836379 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain/epidemiology , Cancer Pain/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care/methods , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Breakthrough Pain/psychology , Breakthrough Pain/therapy , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Cancer Pain/psychology , Cancer Pain/therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Radiation Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Med. paliat ; 20(4): 150-157, oct.-dic. 2013. tab, ima
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-116957

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El dolor irruptivo oncológico (DIO) es una exacerbación aguda del dolor que presenta diferentes criterios diagnósticos y de tratamiento por parte de los diferentes especialistas implicados en su manejo. Para facilitar la toma de decisiones en la práctica clínica habitual, ocho especialistas de referencia de 4 sociedades científicas implicadas en el manejo del paciente oncológico, han diseñado este documento de consenso. MÉTODOS: Tras una búsqueda bibliográfica en las publicaciones más relevantes sobre DIO, se establecieron las recomendaciones preliminares. El grupo de expertos realizó una reunión de trabajo siguiendo la metodología Metaplan(R), donde se debatieron las recomendaciones a incorporar al documento. Cada una de las afirmaciones y recomendaciones fueron clasificadas según su grado de recomendación, atendiendo a las categorías del sistema SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). RESULTADOS: El manejo del DIO requiere de una anamnesis completa, tanto del DIO como del dolor basal, y una exploración física del paciente asociada a pruebas complementarias cuando sean precisas. Los fármacos de elección para el tratamiento del DIO deben ser aquellos que muestren una analgesia potente, con rápido inicio de acción, efectos secundarios mínimos y de fácil administración. El fentanilo administrado por vía transmucosa es actualmente el principio activo más adecuado a las necesidades analgésicas del dolor irruptivo, con independencia del opioide mayor utilizado para el control del dolor basal. CONCLUSIÓN: Este consenso puede ser una herramienta útil para la mejora de la calidad de vida del paciente con cáncer, ya que permite un mejor diagnóstico y tratamiento del DIO


INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is an acute exacerbation of baseline pain. The clinicians involved in its management have different diagnostic and therapeutic criteria. In order to facilitate decision making in usual clinical practice, 8 reference experts from 4 scientific associations involved in the management of patients with cancer pain have developed this Consensus Document. METHODS: After an initial search on the most relevant publications in BTcP literature, a set of preliminary recommendations were established. A working meeting was subsequently held with the experts, following the Metaplan(R) methodology -a structured brainstorming technique- that produced a first version of the Consensus Document which, after several review rounds, was validated by all the participants. Every statement and recommendation was sorted according to its degree of recommendation, following the categories in the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) system. OUTCOMES: The management of BTcP requires a full anamnesis, both of BTcP itself and of baseline pain, a physical examination and the supplementary tests that are deemed necessary. The drugs of choice for the treatment of BTcP must be those with a potent and rapid analgesic effect a short duration, minimal side effects and easy administration. Transmucosal fentanyl is currently the active ingredient most fitting to the analgesic needs of BTcP, regardless of the major opioid used for control of the baseline pain. CONCLUSION: This Consensus can be a very useful tool to improve the quality of life in cancer patients, because it guides the clinician towards a better diagnose and treatment of BTcP


Subject(s)
Humans , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care/methods , Hospice Care/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 10(8): 478-85, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18667378

ABSTRACT

Spain's radiation oncology infrastructure has evolved in terms of both quantity and structure since the last analysis was carried out in 1999. The purpose of this paper is to describe the current facilities, basically consisting of external radiotherapeutic units, and to present a calculation model for estimating the number of irradiation units required to guarantee equitable cover for radiotherapeutic treatment. An electronic questionnaire was designed to be accessed via a link on the Spanish Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology Web page. The questionnaire provides details of the current state of Spain's radiotherapeutic facilities, and a descriptive study has been performed with analytical data. The scope of the study included all the centres providing oncology-radiotherapy in Spain. The units analysed encompassed the centres and irradiation units actively providing care in 2004. Ninety-seven centres were detected, in which 177 external radiotherapy units were registered. Forty-five of these were cobalt units and 132 were accelerators. The rate of radiotherapy use in Spain based on the best scientific evidence available and on its rate of use with cancer has been estimated at 61%. The number of external irradiation units available in 2004 (177) is clearly lower than the number desirable (266-316).


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Radiation Oncology/trends , Technology, Radiologic/instrumentation , Cancer Care Facilities/supply & distribution , Cobalt/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Particle Accelerators/standards , Particle Accelerators/supply & distribution , Quality Control , Spain , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...