ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The concept of personal recovery after psychotic illness focuses more on patients' social and existential needs compared to traditional outcome measures including clinical and functional recovery. This research aims to contribute to a broad framework on (personal) recovery and associated factors. METHODS: Data from 203 persons with symptomatic remission of their first-episode psychosis from the ongoing HAMLETT study were analyzed. To determine the relative importance of several biological, clinical, psychological, and social factors in explaining personal recovery as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), partial Spearman correlations (controlling for clinical recovery (PANSS) and functional recovery (WHODAS 2.0)) and a bootstrapped multiple regression were performed. Indirect effects on personal recovery within these factors, clinical recovery, and functional recovery were explored using a regularized partial correlation network. RESULTS: Of the factors that explained personal recovery beyond the effects of clinical and functional recovery, social support was the strongest predictor, followed by self-esteem, internalized stigma, and insecure attachment, collectively explaining 48.2 % of the variance. Anhedonia/apathy showed a trend towards a negative correlation. Age at onset, sex, early trauma/neglect, cognition, and being married/cohabiting did not significantly correlate with personal recovery. The network (n = 143) was consistent with these findings and indicated possible mediation pathways for early trauma/neglect, insecure attachment, cognition, and being married/cohabiting. CONCLUSIONS: Personal recovery is an important addition to traditional measures of outcome after psychosis. Various quality of life indicators, such as self-esteem and social support, explain variance in personal recovery over clinical and functional recovery.
