Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurse Educ Pract ; 51: 102992, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636488

ABSTRACT

Clinical nurse educators in a BSN program developed the SIM-PLE (Simulation-Positive Learning Evaluation) rubric to evaluate student performance in simulation. A pilot study was conducted over two semesters with junior level medical-surgical classes made up of approximately 110-130 students each semester, and the tool was revised and re-evaluated. Inter-rater reliability testing utilized 69 SIM-PLE rubric student evaluations (N = 69). Inter-rater reliability was assessed with comparison of lead faculty with three other instructors utilizing two raters for each simulation experience. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) suggested high inter-rater reliability. The t-test difference was not significant. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in the Collaboration subcategory score. Univariate ANOVA indicated both raters scored consistently with each other overall and that they both scored JR1 differently than JR2. The pilot study and testing of interrater reliability of the rubric revealed positive findings. The role of the rubric in providing formative feedback during debrief sessions empowered students to analyze their own performance and/or experience to self-correct or improve their future practice based on these experiences.


Subject(s)
High Fidelity Simulation Training , Medical-Surgical Nursing , Educational Measurement , Humans , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Brain Inj ; 23(6): 528-34, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19484626

ABSTRACT

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study examines the relationship between scores on the Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile (WNSSP) and therapeutic participation as it relates to rehabilitation readiness (RR) in adolescents with low response following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a serial observational design using multiple measures of clinical status and participation. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Ten children, mean age 16.7 years, who remained in a low response state (30 days or more) were assessed with the WNSSP and videotaped during physical and occupational therapy sessions. Associations were evaluated between WNSSP scores and participation scores related to arousal, awareness and communication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The WNSSP was only associated with the communication score (p < 0.0001). The arousal and awareness scores had no significant impact on the WNSSP score. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that scores on the WNSSP may be related to the return of communication skills in adolescents in low response states as one part of assessing their therapeutic participation and ultimate rehabilitation readiness. This ability may assist in making decisions regarding care planning.


Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Awareness/physiology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Arousal/drug effects , Awareness/drug effects , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Brain Inj ; 21(1): 63-8, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17364521

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between location and pattern of brain injury identified on MRI and prolonged low response state in children post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This observational study compared 15 children who spontaneously recovered within 30 days post-TBI to 17 who remained in a prolonged low response state. RESULTS: 92.9% of children with brain stem injury were in the low response group. The predicted probability was 0.81 for brain stem injury alone, increasing to 0.95 with a regional pattern of injury to the brain stem, basal ganglia, and thalamus. CONCLUSIONS: Low response state in children post-TBI is strongly correlated with two distinctive regions of injury: the brain stem alone, and an injury pattern to the brain stem, basal ganglia, and thalamus. This study demonstrates the need for large-scale clinical studies using MRI as a tool for outcome assessment in children and adolescents following severe TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/pathology , Unconsciousness/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Basal Ganglia/injuries , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Stem/injuries , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Persistent Vegetative State/etiology , Persistent Vegetative State/pathology , Sex Factors , Thalamus/injuries , Unconsciousness/etiology
4.
J Child Neurol ; 21(10): 879-85, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17005105

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine whether a dopamine agonist could improve mental status among children in a low-response state following traumatic brain injury. In an 8-week, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, 10 children and adolescents ages 8 to 21 years (X = 16.7 years) with traumatic brain injury sustained at least 1 month previously and remaining in a low-response state (Rancho Los Amigos Scale level pound 3) received pramipexole or amantadine. Medication dosage was increased over 4 weeks, weaned over 2 weeks, and then discontinued. At baseline and weekly during the study, subjects were evaluated with the Coma Near Coma Scale, Western NeuroSensory Stimulation Profile, and Disability Rating Scale. Scores improved significantly from baseline to the medication phase on the Coma Near Coma Scale, Western NeuroSensory Stimulation Profile, and Disability Rating Scale (P < .005). The weekly rate of change was significantly better for all three measures on medication than off medication (P < .05). Rancho Los Amigos Scale levels improved significantly on medication as well (P < .05). There was no difference in efficacy between amantadine and pramipexole. No unexpected or significant side effects were observed with either drug. This clinical trial supports the benefit of two dopamine agonists in the restoration of functional arousal, awareness, and communication. These drugs can be helpful in accelerating eligibility for acute rehabilitation among children and adolescents who have sustained significant brain injuries.


Subject(s)
Amantadine/therapeutic use , Benzothiazoles/therapeutic use , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disability Evaluation , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pramipexole , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...