Removal of multiple sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: defining the "correct" node.

PURPOSE: Sentinel node biopsy is routinely used for axillary staging in patients with clinical and radiological node negative breast cancer. The number of nodes removed at surgery is highly variable. A mean of 2.4 nodes is frequently seen in the larger series. Removal of multiple (3 or more) nodes does not improve the accuracy but increases both operative time and pathological analysis. The aim of the current study was to define the correct sentinel node based on uptake of blue dye and radioactive counts. METHODS: The sentinel node was identified in 121 consecutive patients using isosulfan blue dye and radioisotope. Nodes were labelled sequentially as (i) Hot (ii) Blue or (iii) Hot and Blue and submitted for pathological analysis. Data pertaining to blue dye uptake and radioisotope counts were recorded prospectively. This was correlated with pathological and scintigraphy findings. RESULTS: Thirty eight (32%) patients had a positive sentinel node. "Hot and Blue" nodes were found in 105 cases. The number of hot and blue nodes correlated exactly with the number seen on scintigraphy. "Blue" nodes were found in one case. "Hot" nodes were found in 15 cases. In cases where a "hot and blue" node was positive there were no further "hot" or "blue" nodes found to be positive. CONCLUSION: Removal of multiple sentinel nodes can be avoided by removing all hot and blue nodes and correlating with findings on lymphoscintigraphy. When present (87% of cases), the "hot and blue" node accurately predicts the pathological burden of the axilla.

Acute colonic obstruction due to benign prostatic hypertrophy.

A seventy two year old man presented to the Emergency Department with clinical features of colonic obstruction. Subsequent radiological investigations confirmed this impression and revealed the aetiology to be compression of the sigmoid colon against the sacrum by a massively distended urinary bladder. Chronic urinary retention due to benign prostatic hypertrophy is an extremely unusual cause of large bowel obstruction. Little in this patient's clinical findings suggested this aetiology. We reviewed the literature in this area and highlight the benefits of CT scanning over contrast studies.