Prevalence and Risk Factors of Brain Infarcts and Associations With Cognitive Performance in Tenants of Marginal Housing.

Background Homeless and vulnerably housed individuals are at increased risk for multimorbidity compared with the general population. We assessed prevalence of brain infarcts on neuroimaging and associations with vascular risk factors and cognitive performance in a prospective study of residents living in marginal housing. Methods and Results Two hundred twenty-eight participants underwent structured clinical interviews, targeted clinical, laboratory, and neuropsychological assessments, and magnetic resonance imaging with T1, T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and susceptibility-weighted images. Subjects underwent cognitive testing to assess premorbid IQ , verbal learning and memory, inhibition, sustained attention, mental flexibility, and decision making. In this sample (mean age 44.0 years [ SD 9.4], 77% male), prevalence of conventional vascular risk factors was lower than in the general population apart from tobacco use (94%). Ten-year Framingham risk for any cardiovascular event was 11.4%±9.2%. Brain infarcts were present in 25/228 (11%). All were ischemic (40% cortical, 56% lacunar, 4% both). Participants with infarcts were older than those without (48.9±9.4 versus 43.4±9.2, P=0.006). In a multivariable regression analysis, only age remained a significant predictor of brain infarcts (odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14, P=0.004). After controlling for age and education, the presence of infarct was a significant predictor of impaired decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task of decision making (ß -28.2, 95% CI -42.7 to -14.1, P<0.001). Conclusions Prevalence of infarcts on neuroimaging in this disadvantaged, community-dwelling cohort was much higher than expected for age and was associated with impaired decision making. Further research is needed to identify individuals at highest risk who may benefit from targeted preventative strategies.

A Canadian multicenter trial assessing memory and executive functions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with olanzapine.

Serial verbal learning task (explicit long-term memory) and verbal fluency (generation of a response) are tests that are usually severely impaired in schizophrenia. Despite the growing literature supporting the clinical efficacy of olanzapine, psychiatrists still question its cognitive consequences. This study assessed the efficacy of olanzapine on neurocognitive functioning. Patients (N = 134) meeting diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorders began an 8-week, open-label olanzapine treatment at a dose of 5 mg/d, which was increased to 10 mg/d after 1 week. Daily dosage was subsequently adjusted between 5 and 20 mg/d based on individual clinical status. All previous antipsychotics were tapered and discontinued during the first 2 weeks of the study. Neuropsychologic assessments were carried out at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. Explicit long-term memory was assessed with the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test: the average immediate recall score significantly improved (P < 0.001), as did the delayed recall score (P < 0.001). The average total score on category fluency improved from 34.6 words at baseline to 37.6 words at end point (P < 0.0001). Time on both Trail A and B making tasks significantly decreased (P < 0.0001). Lack of a control arm makes it impossible to exclude a practice effect as an explanation for the enhanced cognitive performance, although the Word List Recall test represents one of the better resources to avoid a practice effect. After switching to olanzapine, there was a statistically significant improvement of cognitive function in the 3 main domains tested and no significant worsening of any memory or executive function measure.