The Anesthetic Effectiveness of J-Tip Needle-Free Injection System Prior to Trigger Finger Injection: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a J-tip needle-free injection system (JNFS) to reduce pain associated with corticosteroid injection of the tendon sheath for treatment of trigger finger. Methods: Thirty-four consecutive trigger fingers occurring in 28 unique patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria were consented and enrolled into this double-blind randomized controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to the control (JNFS loaded with sterile normal saline) or treatment group (JNFS loaded with buffered 1% lidocaine). Both the fellowship-trained hand surgeon and patient were blinded to the allocation group. Prior to each trigger finger injection, each patient rated pain associated with stubbing toe and papercut on the visual analog scale (VAS), in addition to a postprocedure VAS pain score. Results: A total of 28 patients and 34 digits were enrolled in this study. There was no difference in patient demographics or preintervention pain perception between the control and treatment groups. The use of JNFS demonstrated lower mean pain VAS score when comparing the control group (n = 17) with the treatment group (n = 17), with VAS pain scores of 49 (SD = 31) and 39 (SD = 36), respectively. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .389). Conclusions: The use of JNFS loaded with 1% buffered lidocaine may reduce pain associated with trigger finger injections, although our results did not find a statistically significant difference. We hypothesize that the pain caused by the acidity of lidocaine is the primary driver of pain and discomfort during injection, and the pain from the needle stick is secondary. As a result, any pain reduction from JNFS is masked by the most painful part of injection-the delivery of injectate. Based on the findings and experience obtained from this study, we hypothesize that a follow-up study using buffered lidocaine may be able to better reveal the benefits of JNFS.

A systematic review of upper extremity neuropathy following total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature describing upper extremity neuropathy following the procedure. We performed a systematic review of upper extremity neuropathy following total hip arthroplasty (THA) to provide characteristics regarding the incidence, suspected aetiology, and outcomes of such complications. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed which investigated the COCHRANE and Medline databases regarding "peripheral neuropathy total hip arthroplasty" and "nerve palsy associated total hip arthroplasty." Studies were excluded if they were not Level I, II, or III of evidence or had incomplete reported data. Studies were evaluated and data was extracted for the analysis if they met all inclusion criteria. Data extracted was compiled to assess nerve injury, aetiology, and resolution of symptoms. RESULTS: The search included 77 articles and 4 were selected for inclusion. A total of 21,346 patients underwent a THA with 40 of those cases resulting in an upper extremity nerve injury yielding a complication rate of 0.20%. The most likely aetiology of the upper extremity neuropathy was a compression neuropathy related to improper patient positioning of the contralateral/ipsilateral arm. Full resolution was reported in 74.42% of these cases (32 of 43 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity neuropathy following THA is a rare complication that presents with variations of sensory and motor deficits. A thorough attention to proper positioning of the upper extremity is necessary to mitigate this risk.

Clinical Decision Making for a Soft Tissue Hand Mass: When and How to Biopsy.

Evaluation of a hand mass and subsequent surgical treatment is a frequent clinical encounter for the practicing hand surgeon. The clinical evaluation of benign and malignant hand tumors has traditionally focused on diagnosis, surgical excision, and reconstruction. There is a paucity of literature discussing the determining factors for a hand mass biopsy, its appropriate technique, and postbiopsy preparation and handling. This review discusses the approaches of the hand surgeon and orthopedic oncologist to a soft tissue mass in the hand and clarifies the term biopsy. Special attention is focused on preoperative decisions and indications for core needle, incisional, and excisional biopsies of hand masses. In addition, we include a discussion of surgical technique for obtaining a specimen, processing a specimen, and sending a specimen for pathological evaluation. This highlights specimen labeling and type of fixative utilized for pathological evaluation. This review features a section detailing clinical strategies to reduce morbidity associated with evaluation and treatment of benign and malignant hand masses and is based on recommendations from a synopsis of expert opinion and literature review.

Hand compression neuropathy: An assessment guide.

When a patient presents with pain or paresthesias of the hand and fingers, knowing what to ask, what to look for, and which tests to consider is essential.